Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Is this a usable engine combination worth building?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 02:25 PM
  #1  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
Question Is this a usable engine combination worth building?

For my FP car I've considered rebuilding a TII engine with N/A rotors and have it bridge ported. Use the lower intake piece off a TII with a custom intake plenum similiar to the SDS one on this link.

http://www.sdsefi.com/techinta.htm

Using the lower TII intake piece I'll use the factory locations for fuel injectors along with some stand alone EMS to control everything. Remember that the car will be N/A since a turbo is not allowed in FP.

Any feed back about this combination of parts?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:07 PM
  #2  
Greg's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: The First State
I like
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:21 PM
  #3  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Re: Is this a usable engine combination worth building?

Originally posted by FPrep2ndGenRX7
For my FP car I've considered rebuilding a TII engine with N/A rotors and have it bridge ported. Use the lower intake piece off a TII with a custom intake plenum similiar to the SDS one on this link.

http://www.sdsefi.com/techinta.htm

Using the lower TII intake piece I'll use the factory locations for fuel injectors along with some stand alone EMS to control everything. Remember that the car will be N/A since a turbo is not allowed in FP.

Any feed back about this combination of parts?
Honestly, a 4 port engine with 89-91 (or even 3rd gen rotors) is my dream NA engine. I've seen lots of cars with this combination (or similar), RB intake and Holley beating the hell out of Z28, DSM, etc.

Now with a EMS, it should be even better. I would recomend, using a T2 lower manifold with a Webber style EFI upper intake, or a RB manifold with a Holley style EFI carb. Another option is to get a spacer and use a lower T2 manifold with a FD upper manifold.

Honestly, I keep debating myself between doing a T2 swap, or what I mention above
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
zyounker's Avatar
root
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I would get a IDA style manifold for a 4 port engine and then buy the TWM TB for it.. And use some sort of Fuel computer..


Check out:
http://www.twminduction.com/Throttle...leBody-FR.html

the 3000 series would be the correct one.. and they run ~300...


-Zach
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:29 PM
  #5  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
i remember reading somewhere about a racers who do just that for oval track use... i dont even think they switched to N/A rotors, kept the turbo ones... bridge port and standalone EFI with the stock intake manifold.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #6  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
Originally posted by zyounker
I would get a IDA style manifold for a 4 port engine and then buy the TWM TB for it.. And use some sort of Fuel computer..


Check out:
http://www.twminduction.com/Throttle...leBody-FR.html

the 3000 series would be the correct one.. and they run ~300...


-Zach
My reason for using the lower TII intake piece is to save money. Build an intake plenum with air horns inside and the distance from the air horn to the ports in the engine is about the same as an IDA setup. I have to do this the least expensive way I can and buying the TWM pieces is not an option for me. If I can get 95% of the performance as the TWM stuff I don't think its worth it to spend the $500 +/- when I can spend $100(maybe less) and build it myself including a throttle body with a TPS already mounted on it.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
zyounker's Avatar
root
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Then why even do it? you could just use the S5 TII lower and upper intake.. and use the TB from it too..


Then just get an extention made and throw a k&N filter on..


Pick up a fuel computer and you are done.


Obviously you will need a map sensor too. or you could probably use the MAF from a TII...


-Zach
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:55 PM
  #8  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
zyounker - The map sensor mounts easily in the intake plenum I want to build. I also want to keep the intake on the right side of the engine. My FP car doesn't have headlights and I want to mount the air filter on/in or near the right headlight location. The TB will be mounted on the end of the intake plenum instead of the side. That keeps everything away from the left side of the engine. I'm going to have power steering eventually due to 10" wide racing slicks and the power steering pump is right in the way of I use the factory upper intake piece. The factory upper piece is also heavier than what I want to build.

I'm not sure it the factory TPS or MAF is usable with all stand alone EMS.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #9  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally posted by FPrep2ndGenRX7
zyounker - The map sensor mounts easily in the intake plenum I want to build. I also want to keep the intake on the right side of the engine. My FP car doesn't have headlights and I want to mount the air filter on/in or near the right headlight location. The TB will be mounted on the end of the intake plenum instead of the side. That keeps everything away from the left side of the engine. I'm going to have power steering eventually due to 10" wide racing slicks and the power steering pump is right in the way of I use the factory upper intake piece. The factory upper piece is also heavier than what I want to build.

I'm not sure it the factory TPS or MAF is usable with all stand alone EMS.
I'm almost sure you can use the 3rd gen mafd sensor with a stand alone.

Atkins sell the EFI webber style TB, and manifolds, the whole kit including a Microtech, with maps, spark plug cables, etc for +\- $2800
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2002 | 10:19 PM
  #10  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
That engine combo should work great. My 2nd gen has the stock lower T-II manifold due to injector location but I did build a custom upper manifold out of aluminum. There is a 75 mm Mustang tb. attached to it. The idea came from the SDS website but mine looks nothing like theirs. I have a large rectangular plenum and my runners exit out the back of the plenum and the turn 90 degrees downward. My tb is also very far away from the plenum and around a 90 degree bend facing the front of the car. This was done so that the turbulence from the throttle plate would be dissipated by the time the air gets to the plenum. It works great!!! Screw the factory upper and tb, mine flows much more I'll have to post some picks. It is damn cool looking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
rotor_veux
Build Threads
46
Jun 12, 2018 10:39 AM
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.