Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

trap speed of 117mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
94touring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
trap speed of 117mph

I borrowed one of those g-tech gauges today and made a few 1/4 passes. I have horrible traction and spin completly through 1st and 2nd gears before actually hooking up, so my 1/4 time sucked, and was a 13.2. So my question is what should I expect with good traction in the 1/4 with 117 trap speed? I may put my old nittos back on to see what kind of results I have.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 10:09 PM
  #2  
87GTR's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 1
From: Nago Okinawa
I did 11.9 @ 117
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 03:36 AM
  #3  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
The reports I have heard say that the G-Tech will measure times pretty close to what you'll get on the strip but that the MPH is consistently a little higher on the G-Tech. The explanation I heard was that the G-Tech gives you your instantaneous MPH at the 1/4 mile point, but that you get an average over the last 100 feet at the track or something like that. I don't know if that is quite right on the explanation, but the difference is supposed to be consistent and thus repeatable.

-Max
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 04:44 AM
  #4  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
Originally posted by maxcooper
The reports I have heard say that the G-Tech will measure times pretty close to what you'll get on the strip but that the MPH is consistently a little higher on the G-Tech. The explanation I heard was that the G-Tech gives you your instantaneous MPH at the 1/4 mile point, but that you get an average over the last 100 feet at the track or something like that. I don't know if that is quite right on the explanation, but the difference is supposed to be consistent and thus repeatable.

-Max
You're correct
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 11:19 AM
  #5  
95R2-89TII Ground Zero's Avatar
Banned
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, MI
11.9 @117. Man, thats pretty good.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 03:08 PM
  #6  
Dyre's Avatar
Your Opinion is Wrong
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Peoples Republic of California
G-Tech times become much less accurate if you spin the tires at all....
So i wouldn't be to sure of that mph, unless of course your car should be putting down those MPH anyways...
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 03:53 PM
  #7  
94touring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
My car dynoed at 365rwhp with 352rwtq. So i'm thinking that with traction a trap speed of 117 should be about normal.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 02:34 AM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta.Georgia
nice speed man. take it to the local track and see what times u can turn with that speed
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2002 | 02:33 PM
  #9  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
drag radials - with that much rwhp you should be in the 11s but the trap looks about right
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
WyomingTII
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
12
Sep 28, 2015 10:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.