Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

New Inline 4-Barrel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #1  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
Thread Starter
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
New Inline 4-Barrel

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...l_inline_carb/

Who's going to be the first to try one of these on a rotary?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #2  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by 13BT_RX3
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...l_inline_carb/

Who's going to be the first to try one of these on a rotary?

Very nice.
I hope it totally eliminate the problem with the fuel bowl being turned sideways causing problems.
Leave it up to Barry Grant to re-invent the 4bbl carb.
Looks promissing.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #3  
Doc Holiday's Avatar
Needs more cow bell
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 833
Likes: 4
From: Reno, NV
Looks too long to be used on a rotary. Unless they offer a 2bbl version.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
I've seen dual Weber DCOE's on a rotary so it should fit.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #5  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
it should fit, but I don't see any type of advantage on of a inline arrangement on a rotary over a standard 4 barrell, all other things being equal of corse.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Better fuel bowl design just to name one.
Should do a much better job controlling fuel level especially when high G-forces are involved. Only major down fall to the traditional 4bbl design would be the lack of stage secondaries on a rotary applications.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #7  
rotaryengineering's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Talking Inline 4-Barrel

I have a Intake system I just completed for my P-Port motor that looks very similar to that setup. The system consists of 2 Geers Engineering 62mm Carbs joined together to make one huge inline 4 barrel carb. Complete custom setup for my Drag car. Hope to have it running in a couple of weeks.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #8  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by rotaryengineering
I have a Intake system I just completed for my P-Port motor that looks very similar to that setup. The system consists of 2 Geers Engineering 62mm Carbs joined together to make one huge inline 4 barrel carb. Complete custom setup for my Drag car. Hope to have it running in a couple of weeks.
Twin 62mm G's
Should be interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #9  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
Thread Starter
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
+ 1 on the cornering issue.

An inline design would make it easier to have equal length intake runners. The problem with this BG carb is that the primaries are the 1st and 3rd barrels not the two inner or two outers. The intake manifold might be a little tricky to make.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #10  
Peacedog94's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Fellas,
Not meaning to thread hijack. Quick question here about possible manifold design. I understand that the manifold will be a bit convoluted due to the the 1st and 3rd "barrel" of the carb being the primary ones, but don't you want a fairly long intake runner on most rotaries to allow the air and fuel to mix properly anyway? I always thought that if the intake runners were too short it caused problems with the intake charge?
Curios,
Peacedog
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #11  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by Peacedog94
but don't you want a fairly long intake runner on most rotaries to allow the air and fuel to mix properly anyway?
The air and fuel are mixed at the venturi. Everything after that serves to un-mix.

That said, I am reminded of the Autolite carbs that Ford made for the Boss 302, back in 1969... manifolds available were single carb, and independent runner with two carbs. They had a jet arrangement similar to a Weber where you didn't have to disassemble the thing to change jets.

Everything old is new again!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #12  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by peejay
The air and fuel are mixed at the venturi. Everything after that serves to un-mix.

That said, I am reminded of the Autolite carbs that Ford made for the Boss 302, back in 1969... manifolds available were single carb, and independent runner with two carbs. They had a jet arrangement similar to a Weber where you didn't have to disassemble the thing to change jets.

Everything old is new again!
That's where It seems the design came from.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #13  
Kenku's Avatar
spoon!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 50
From: Dousman, WI
Kinda cool little piece of kit. Not sure how useful it'd be for rotaries (that seems like a lot of potential flow) but what the heck. And no reason you can't fiddle around with the linkages that work the secondaries to get them to open differently.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM
scissorhands
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Oct 8, 2015 01:17 PM
R|©haźd
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 24, 2015 11:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.