I am thinkin about goin parallel....
#6
Queer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Formerly in the Ass end of the pacific.
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by billyrohm
Oh yeah, and if you don't like it it's totally reversable.
Oh yeah, and if you don't like it it's totally reversable.
As for parallel it just means making it non-sequential, so both spool at the same time. It gets rid of all kinds of junk.
#7
Rotary Enthusiast
try it out a bit ... now
bring up to 3700 in 4th, about 70, ease in clutch and nudge revs up to 6K. Then start dropping rpms and release clutch before rpms drop below 3500, and floor it. This will be a parallel pull. Repeat by easing up to 3700, then flooring it for sequential.
bring up to 3700 in 4th, about 70, ease in clutch and nudge revs up to 6K. Then start dropping rpms and release clutch before rpms drop below 3500, and floor it. This will be a parallel pull. Repeat by easing up to 3700, then flooring it for sequential.
Trending Topics
#8
Tony Stewart Killer.
iTrader: (12)
I personally dont like non sequential but many people seem to enjoy it after theyve done it. It just makes the car a little less exciting and very predictable. Full boost 4200 for me every time. Now on this FD ive got a single turbo and the full boost rpm is similar but the power is incredible and its very exciting when the boost comes on.
#10
Temple of Cornd0g
I've driven them all. Stock is ho-hum. Parallel is nice; Big single is better. Parallel and single free up a lot of power and certainly simplify things. I would never go back to seq.
#11
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Parallel is nicer than seq. in my opinion with the stock turbochargers because there is still not enough lag to even mention, yet a nice power increase.
Single is king though.
Single is king though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post