Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

GSL-SE Aux ports vs FC and a hint of street porting talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2018 | 08:30 PM
  #1  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
GSL-SE Aux ports vs FC and a hint of street porting talk

Specimen is a 1980 model with a GSLSE drivetrain (with a SA transmission) and GSLSE suspension...

As I understand it, the Aux ports on an SE have a port timing of 70* ABDC with the FC being 80*. (Rotary Engine Illustrated) I have also read numerous times that street porting an 6-Port, especially as a novice... limited in the return on investment. I am considering Pineapple Racing or Mazdatrix template, but not purely dead seton it yet. My intention is to use a S4 or preferably S5 intake with DYIAutotune or similar ECU. This car is more of a weekend cuiser and not likely to see competition. I do not intend to touch the primaries, as I hope to keep the MPG at highway cruising "reasonable" but I don't mind dumping some fuel when I get into it. So the point of the story is I am not going for a dyno king but would like to hit 170 or so at the wheels. What would you do?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2019 | 04:09 AM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Run a 4 port.

Changing the primary port timing will not affect fuel economy very much, do not worry about that.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2019 | 09:12 AM
  #3  
mikey D's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 10
From: Pensacola FL
The cheapest route to your goal would be add a low boost turbo to what you have. 170whp on a 6 port isn't very commonly done and in my experiance you end up with an engine that makes peak power beyod the rpm that you want to run a stock ish engine.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2019 | 10:19 AM
  #4  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the best combination i have had in a 6 port, was an FC engine, GSL-SE intakes and a racing beat street port exhaust. not sure how much power it made, but it made it everywhere. there were a few combinations in the car and i can run down some of them:

S4 FC engine, SE EFI, RB single exhaust. butt dyno says it made very similar peak power, at slightly higher rpm, but it lost big below that.

GSL-SE engine with 9.7 rotors, SE EFI, RB dual, it gained power under 2000rpm, but lost a bunch over that.

if needed the S5 engine emissions passages are compatible with the GSL-SE, so in california i could run the GSL-SE intakes on an S5 block and it would emissions test like stock. the S4 blocks off the emissions and will never pass any emissions test anywhere ever.

in 2019, i would add an ecu and some larger more modern injectors. no smog guy has ever checked the ecu, and its fuel only so it would be simple to tune, AFM would get removed for something that looked like an AFM but wasn't

Reply
Old Jan 1, 2019 | 11:03 PM
  #5  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Ideally, I would say start with one of the FC engines, but if you already have a perfectly good S3, then why not start there? Exhaust goes without saying, and the RB dual is the best off-the-shelf choice - assuming, it's not the ONLY choice. I would say go with your FC intake and standalone idea. I think that will take you a long way toward your goal. To that, I would probably also suggest a flywheel at some point in the mix. I also like the idea of modern injectors - just an FYI, Rx-8 ones are nice and they are also cheap. I would say do the porting last, at which point you can either upgrade the S3 rotating assembly to S4 or S5, or you can just start with a complete S4 or S5 block. As for porting, maximize your primaries and secondaries, but I'd refrain from messing with the auxiliaries.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2019 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Personally I have not been enthused with FC-based 6 port anything.




GSL-SE on left, FC on right.

FC just simply closes way too damn late to have any fun. By the time the engine is spinning fast enough to not be losing compression to the massively late port, it is choking on the lack of flow.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2019 | 12:51 PM
  #7  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
I would street port the primaries. That and exhaust porting is where all the gains will be made as like others have said the aux ports( on the FC anyway) already close too late. I used the Pineapple Racing templates on mine with their EP2 template on the exhaust of turbo rotor housings. I really don't see any benefit to not touching the primaries. I averaged 20mpg before. I average 18 to 20mpg now depending on the season( winter blend fuel hurts my mpg). I have hit 23mpg on pure interstate/highyway but most of my driving is probably a 80/20 hwy/city mix. This is on the stock ecu. I figure I could get better on a standalone.

Last edited by Dak; Jan 3, 2019 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastrx7man
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
32
Mar 13, 2012 09:20 PM
Randokuky
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Mar 26, 2008 06:41 PM
pd_day
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Jul 1, 2002 10:35 AM
sublime529
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Jun 24, 2002 02:40 PM
79+80_rx-7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
Feb 23, 2002 10:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.