Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Great article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #1  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
Great article

Thought I'd share, it's a loooong read but well worth it. A little old, but lots of valuable information about knock, octane ratings, fuel composition and even AI.

http://blizzard.rwic.und.edu/~nordli.../gasoline.html

Apologies if this has been posted before, I've never seen it around.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 07:00 PM
  #2  
Carlos Iglesias's Avatar
Corn-to-Noise Converter
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 502
From: The Elysian Fields (Texas)
Great material and reference. Love the final 1500cc Honda engine to 1000 HP discussion at the very end.

Thank Trots!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 02:17 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Carlos Iglesias
Great material and reference. Love the final 1500cc Honda engine to 1000 HP discussion at the very end.

Thank Trots!
the honda SAE paper is floating around the internet, the fuel they used was very important!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
I believe it was a 80+% Toluene mixed with Heptane or something else lower-octaned. I never realized why until this article, nor did I understand the differences between RON and MON.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
I believe it was a 80+% Toluene mixed with Heptane or something else lower-octaned. I never realized why until this article, nor did I understand the differences between RON and MON.
since honda (everyone else too) was limited to 150L of fuel for the whole race, they had to make it more dense. it is weird though, cause they heat the fuel up, and try to get intake air temps UP, the whole engine is tailored around that fuel.

i think i understand RON and MON, but imma go read it, just in case!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #6  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
A LOT of information! i'll start thumbing through it maybe next week. thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #7  
Liborek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Czech republic
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
they had to make it more dense. it is weird though, cause they heat the fuel up, and try to get intake air temps UP, the whole engine is tailored around that fuel.
They found that mixture consisting mostly of toulen gave highest knock suppression at given octan rating.

Increase in fuel temperature and air temperature promoted evaporation of fuel which lowered BSFC with negligible loss of power.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #8  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
I guess that's a possibility if your power output isn't approaching the limit of the octane rating of your fuel.

Anyways, I thought they mixed the Toluene with the Heptane in order to lower not only the Octane rating to the maximum allowed limit, but also the sensitivity of the fuel (difference between RON and MON)?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 11:31 PM
  #9  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
The tendency to knock increases as spark advance is increased, eg 2 degrees BTDC requires 91 octane, whereas 14 degrees BTDC requires 96 octane. If you advance the spark, the flame front starts earlier, and the end gases start forming earlier in the cycle, providing more time for the autoigniting species to form before the piston reaches the optimum position for power delivery, as determined by the normal flame front propagation. It becomes a race between the flame front and decomposition of the increasingly-squashed end gases. High octane fuels produce end gases that take longer to autoignite, so the good flame front reaches and consumes them properly.
i like the way they have described this process,
this is why i argue at high boost and high inlet temps near the fuels limit
that the leading to trailing split is reduced to safe the tune a little
i run in the 8 - 10 degree region for anything past 1 bar ,,housing type ( plug location ) dependent
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #10  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
Thread Starter
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
Also, things that we have generally practiced but few understand is:

-Increasing the engine temperature, particularly the air/fuel charge temperature, increases the tendency to knock. The Sensitivity of a fuel can indicate how it is affected by charge temperature variations. Increasing load increases both the engine temperature, and the end-gas pressure, thus the likelihood of knock increases as load increases

-Faster engine speed means there is less time for the pre-flame reactions in the end gases to occur, thus reducing the tendency to knock. On engines with management systems, the ignition timing may be advanced with engine speed and load, to obtain optimum efficiency at incipient knock. In such cases, both high and low engines speeds may be critical. Likely why we see many people losing apex seals at 5-6K RPM while tuning

-A new engine may only require a fuel of 6-9 octane numbers lower than the same engine after 25,000 km. This Octane Requirement Increase (ORI) is due to the formation of a mixture of organic and inorganic deposits resulting from both the fuel and the lubricant. They reach an equilibrium amount because of flaking, however dramatic changes in driving styles can also result in dramatic changes of the equilibrium position. When the engine starts to burn more oil, the octane requirement can increase again. ORIs up to 12 are not uncommon, depending on driving style [17,19]. The deposits produce the ORI by several mechanisms:-
On the last one re: burning oil, wouldn't OMP be considered as having the same effect?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #11  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by bumpstart
i like the way they have described this process,
this is why i argue at high boost and high inlet temps near the fuels limit
that the leading to trailing split is reduced to safe the tune a little
i run in the 8 - 10 degree region for anything past 1 bar ,,housing type ( plug location ) dependent
+1.

B
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.