Finish building N/A or go Turbo
#1
RIP Icemark
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aloha OR
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finish building N/A or go Turbo
Hey all, I know this sounds really stupid (especaially since my car's not done. Got to be planning thinking all the time ), but I am having a bit of trouble deciding what to do. I want to build a sweet N/A, but have a feeling that I will end up building a turbo. Now the only reason I am having trouble deciding is that I already have done a lot to my N/A; light weight flywheel, rebuilt engine/transmission, exhaust, and a lot of blood sweat and tears.
I was planning on finishing off with a haltech/microtech/wolf EMS, IDA manifold with TWM throttles, SDJ header with a custom exhaust. And maybe build a new motor with a secondary and aux port bridge, with custom actuators for both ports. I figured this would be a fine set-up for attacking the back roads and PIR, and the ocasinal(sp) drag race.
But recently I saw the fc3s.org N/A turbo kit manifold, and it is FAWKING BEUTIFUL And I have always had a idea for a SICK H-mount intercooler set-up
I have been listing the pro-cons between the two. So far the N/A looks to be cheaper, more reliable, less complicated, and the car won't be off the road as much. It won't be as fast, and it will be load as hell.
The turbo is going to be faster, quieter, make neat sounds (gotta love the BOV and wastegate noises). But it will also be more expensive, the car is going to be off the road for longer (I don't know if I can take anymore of that), and I am going to have a buy a LOT of stuff to do the swap.
I am done sounding like a bitch and am prepared for comments.
I was planning on finishing off with a haltech/microtech/wolf EMS, IDA manifold with TWM throttles, SDJ header with a custom exhaust. And maybe build a new motor with a secondary and aux port bridge, with custom actuators for both ports. I figured this would be a fine set-up for attacking the back roads and PIR, and the ocasinal(sp) drag race.
But recently I saw the fc3s.org N/A turbo kit manifold, and it is FAWKING BEUTIFUL And I have always had a idea for a SICK H-mount intercooler set-up
I have been listing the pro-cons between the two. So far the N/A looks to be cheaper, more reliable, less complicated, and the car won't be off the road as much. It won't be as fast, and it will be load as hell.
The turbo is going to be faster, quieter, make neat sounds (gotta love the BOV and wastegate noises). But it will also be more expensive, the car is going to be off the road for longer (I don't know if I can take anymore of that), and I am going to have a buy a LOT of stuff to do the swap.
I am done sounding like a bitch and am prepared for comments.
#4
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would go turbo. You would be a lot more streetable for the same amount of power, or a lot more power for the same level of drivability.
But the turbo route might be more expensive . .
But the turbo route might be more expensive . .
#5
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
But the turbo route might be more expensive . .
But the turbo route might be more expensive . .
Trending Topics
#8
Yeah, shutup kid.
I say build it N/A right now, and put in some strong apex seals(not carbons). Then if you still want turbo, just put it on there, the only thing you'll have to add is the intake piping and intercooler, and change the exhaust. Just boost the N/A motor if you want more once you're done.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post