Anyone using the aluminum side housings from racing beat?
#1
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone using the aluminum side housings from racing beat?
Anyone using these?What are your results with these? Only problem I see with these is damage when apex seal goes.
Last edited by Greg; 06-20-02 at 05:02 PM.
#2
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For 1200bucks, you could buy many other parts. Anyone who can afford these housings are probably professional racers or are loaded finaically. I wonder how many of these they sell a month.
Anyway, if used these with ceramic apex seals and MFR perpheral housings with a big turbo for each housing, your probably looking at A **** load of power for not much weight.
Anyway, if used these with ceramic apex seals and MFR perpheral housings with a big turbo for each housing, your probably looking at A **** load of power for not much weight.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would it be possible to use these lighter housings in a 3rotor conversion and keep the motor in the stock position without having the cost of moving everything back?
#4
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They have them for the 20b engine
http://racingbeat.com/resultset.asp?PartNumber=11072
http://racingbeat.com/resultset.asp?PartNumber=11072
#5
Lives on the Forum
They don't make one for the front/center 20B housing.
I didn't want to put in the first word; I know Greg would've jumped all over me.
They are a waste of money.  You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.  On a 13B, that's not even 100lbs.  Most racing sanctions require minimum weight requirements, so why are you looking at a lighter engine for?  The engine sits pretty low as it is.  It doesn't lower "reciprocating mass".  I guess RB has enough serious inquiries to go ahead an make them.  I think they threw out the ~$1,000 price tag for each housing and got buyers so went ahead with full production.  Lost wax castings shouldn't be that bad for these things.  Scrap aluminum is relatively cheap.  You're looking at a $100-$200 production cost for just the casting.  The machining the probably the biggest cost, as precision is required.  Even with the flame coating and hardening processes, they are probably making a 100% profit on these things - nice.
-Ted
I didn't want to put in the first word; I know Greg would've jumped all over me.
They are a waste of money.  You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.  On a 13B, that's not even 100lbs.  Most racing sanctions require minimum weight requirements, so why are you looking at a lighter engine for?  The engine sits pretty low as it is.  It doesn't lower "reciprocating mass".  I guess RB has enough serious inquiries to go ahead an make them.  I think they threw out the ~$1,000 price tag for each housing and got buyers so went ahead with full production.  Lost wax castings shouldn't be that bad for these things.  Scrap aluminum is relatively cheap.  You're looking at a $100-$200 production cost for just the casting.  The machining the probably the biggest cost, as precision is required.  Even with the flame coating and hardening processes, they are probably making a 100% profit on these things - nice.
-Ted
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,841
Received 2,605 Likes
on
1,848 Posts
its probably something they made for the bonneville car, and decided to sell them. the aviation guys wont even blink at the extra cost to save that much weight
mike
mike
#7
Old [Sch|F]ool
Originally posted by j9fd3s
its probably something they made for the bonneville car, and decided to sell them. the aviation guys wont even blink at the extra cost to save that much weight
mike
its probably something they made for the bonneville car, and decided to sell them. the aviation guys wont even blink at the extra cost to save that much weight
mike
Also, one other advantage to the RB stuff is since they are making them, they can make them without the side ports at all, which is great for PP engines... no chance of compression bleed-thru around the Devcon'ed ports.
Trending Topics
#8
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
They don't make one for the front/center 20B housing.
I didn't want to put in the first word; I know Greg would've jumped all over me.
They are a waste of money.  You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.  On a 13B, that's not even 100lbs.  Most racing sanctions require minimum weight requirements, so why are you looking at a lighter engine for?  The engine sits pretty low as it is.  It doesn't lower "reciprocating mass".  I guess RB has enough serious inquiries to go ahead an make them.  I think they threw out the ~$1,000 price tag for each housing and got buyers so went ahead with full production.  Lost wax castings shouldn't be that bad for these things.  Scrap aluminum is relatively cheap.  You're looking at a $100-$200 production cost for just the casting.  The machining the probably the biggest cost, as precision is required.  Even with the flame coating and hardening processes, they are probably making a 100% profit on these things - nice.
-Ted
They don't make one for the front/center 20B housing.
I didn't want to put in the first word; I know Greg would've jumped all over me.
They are a waste of money.  You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.  On a 13B, that's not even 100lbs.  Most racing sanctions require minimum weight requirements, so why are you looking at a lighter engine for?  The engine sits pretty low as it is.  It doesn't lower "reciprocating mass".  I guess RB has enough serious inquiries to go ahead an make them.  I think they threw out the ~$1,000 price tag for each housing and got buyers so went ahead with full production.  Lost wax castings shouldn't be that bad for these things.  Scrap aluminum is relatively cheap.  You're looking at a $100-$200 production cost for just the casting.  The machining the probably the biggest cost, as precision is required.  Even with the flame coating and hardening processes, they are probably making a 100% profit on these things - nice.
-Ted
Last edited by Greg; 06-21-02 at 07:21 AM.
#9
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.
You're paying big bucks for saving maybe about 20lbs. per housing.
They wear much better than the stock housings, but IMO they are going to have to last an awfully long time to warrant that price tag, especially if you need some type of porting other than PP.
I wonder if there is an advantage in the aluminum side housings expanding at the same rate as the rotor housings? Maybe less stress on the dowels?
#10
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Not even - more 15 lbs per housing.
They wear much better than the stock housings, but IMO they are going to have to last an awfully long time to warrant that price tag, especially if you need some type of porting other than PP.
I wonder if there is an advantage in the aluminum side housings expanding at the same rate as the rotor housings? Maybe less stress on the dowels?
Not even - more 15 lbs per housing.
They wear much better than the stock housings, but IMO they are going to have to last an awfully long time to warrant that price tag, especially if you need some type of porting other than PP.
I wonder if there is an advantage in the aluminum side housings expanding at the same rate as the rotor housings? Maybe less stress on the dowels?
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I AM canadian
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thi is the first I ever heard of them. Before you jump in and say stock is good enough.
I would buy them, and try them out. All things considered that is not very expensive for a set of housings especially because they are in aluminum.
One benefit I see is they may or may not crack as easy around the front housing, but porting is easier and the casting may be different to allow for different ports.
also that 60 lbs of the front oan rx7 will make it weight transfer a hell of alot better!
where do I sign.
I would buy them, and try them out. All things considered that is not very expensive for a set of housings especially because they are in aluminum.
One benefit I see is they may or may not crack as easy around the front housing, but porting is easier and the casting may be different to allow for different ports.
also that 60 lbs of the front oan rx7 will make it weight transfer a hell of alot better!
where do I sign.
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The dowl area on the housings actually look bigger than the FC and the FDs. Still I am wonder how much stress the aluminum can take on it with the heat that the engine makes. The weight loss is definately a plue in drag racing but im trying to see if the pros outweigh the cons
#13
WTF is wrong with it now?
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, ON
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
I wonder if there is an advantage in the aluminum side housings expanding at the same rate as the rotor housings? Maybe less stress on the dowels?
I wonder if there is an advantage in the aluminum side housings expanding at the same rate as the rotor housings? Maybe less stress on the dowels?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is ASE_Joe:
Another problem with Aluminium heads on a cast block is elctrolysis of the cooling system due to the different materials. I hear that it actually eats the cooling ysytem slowly, and the lost material can clog the smaller cooling jackets and radiator.
Another problem with Aluminium heads on a cast block is elctrolysis of the cooling system due to the different materials. I hear that it actually eats the cooling ysytem slowly, and the lost material can clog the smaller cooling jackets and radiator.
#15
20B N/A Wide Body FC3S
Pros and Cons I can think of...
Pros: I build my engines in my 2nd floor apartment, it'd be much easier to carry them down stairs to put them in the car...
Aluminum will disipate heat much faster than cast iron
possibly helping to releive hot spots in the engine...
If they can stick the secondary ports on the intermediat housing you could build a cheaper 26B and they would be easy to machine for the extra stationary gears.
Cons: I'll bet the first time you overheat the engine, via radiator hose breaking etc.. they'll warp and be junk
corner seal wear into the housing will be much faster
more engine vibration due to less engine mass, with the same mass spinning inside it..
Pros: I build my engines in my 2nd floor apartment, it'd be much easier to carry them down stairs to put them in the car...
Aluminum will disipate heat much faster than cast iron
possibly helping to releive hot spots in the engine...
If they can stick the secondary ports on the intermediat housing you could build a cheaper 26B and they would be easy to machine for the extra stationary gears.
Cons: I'll bet the first time you overheat the engine, via radiator hose breaking etc.. they'll warp and be junk
corner seal wear into the housing will be much faster
more engine vibration due to less engine mass, with the same mass spinning inside it..
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to me you could save around 36 lb's/ 16 Kg's on the weight of your engine(13B), as a percentage that is around 15/20%(bear block weight). All that weight is sitting on the front axle.
Now if you are a street light racer it would seem a little extreme to fork out the gold for these housings. If your a serious racer with a car that you have spent considerable time and money lightening,it is very hard to find amother 16Kg's to rip out!!
It would be nice if they were a little cheaper
Now if you are a street light racer it would seem a little extreme to fork out the gold for these housings. If your a serious racer with a car that you have spent considerable time and money lightening,it is very hard to find amother 16Kg's to rip out!!
It would be nice if they were a little cheaper
#17
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder how quickly they will start whipping out performance port housings for renesis engines? Seems like the next logical step, I'm sure porting the exhuast on those sideplates will be VERY limited by Mazda's attempt to prevent modification to the ports. Ofcourse, I'm sure a popular mod will be to go to a exhuast port on the rotor housings later on. Maybe they will make up rotor housings too? Thats what they should do to compete with Mazdas new rotor housings to get a price a little less then $359 for say a 12a rotor housing...
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I AM canadian
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I called them to order and I found out they only had the rear and intermediate housing, they come closed up with no port.
apparently they've been sitting on those castings for many many years.
Anyway there is no front housing so I'm out.
and BTW they're 1300 EACH!
apparently they've been sitting on those castings for many many years.
Anyway there is no front housing so I'm out.
and BTW they're 1300 EACH!
#20
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1300 each is out of the question anyways, That would be $3900 is side housings!!! Id rather have a 3 rotor with porting And why in gods name didnt they make the front? Maybe they wanted your to have a weird lookin engine
#21
RX-Parts
iTrader: (3)
greg, i think mangus means that they just dont have any front plates left.
it looks as if these plates have just been sitting in storage somewhere for years. I think it's a 'while supplies last' kinda situation.
it looks as if these plates have just been sitting in storage somewhere for years. I think it's a 'while supplies last' kinda situation.
Originally posted by Greg
1300 each is out of the question anyways, That would be $3900 is side housings!!! Id rather have a 3 rotor with porting And why in gods name didnt they make the front? Maybe they wanted your to have a weird lookin engine
1300 each is out of the question anyways, That would be $3900 is side housings!!! Id rather have a 3 rotor with porting And why in gods name didnt they make the front? Maybe they wanted your to have a weird lookin engine
#23
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
So for $1300 US you also get a rear end plate with no where to bolt up your oil pressure regulator !
They are **** !
RB can suck my ***** ! $1300 what a joke
They are **** !
RB can suck my ***** ! $1300 what a joke
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
08-26-15 09:52 PM