Poor Article in SCC on Suspension 101
#1
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Poor Article in SCC on Suspension 101
This was part 3 in a series, hitting on roll centers and lowering. Author suggested lowering the CG would not reduce weight transfer (cornering) if roll centers dropped much more than CG. Wrong. Even came up with a misleading CG axis that he calls his own. Can't believe this was published .. Dave C is usually correct, but this guy Mark X was way off. Truth is, for lowering a reasonably stiff chassis:
1) total weight transfer will be proprtional to the single point CG_1 height for the total car weight.
2) body roll increases proportional to distance from single point CG_2 (for the sprung weight only) distance to the roll axis. Stiffer springs tend to offset increased roll due to lowering.
Guy was trying to use front and rear cg's in his analysis, which was his major blunder.
1) total weight transfer will be proprtional to the single point CG_1 height for the total car weight.
2) body roll increases proportional to distance from single point CG_2 (for the sprung weight only) distance to the roll axis. Stiffer springs tend to offset increased roll due to lowering.
Guy was trying to use front and rear cg's in his analysis, which was his major blunder.
#2
GET OFF MY LAWN
iTrader: (1)
Wouldn't the fact that the roll center usually lowers more than the CG affect weight transfer? I have not seen the article but the car will require more roll stiffness,either from springs or bars, to corner with the same degree of lean if the RC(s) drop(s) more than the CG. I wonder if he was thinking about Fr/Rr roll centers, as far as I know ther is only one CG. What's on the cover I'll see if I can find the mag.
#3
Lives on the Forum
I'll have to stop by a newstand and read that article.
It's sad that it was published if what you say is true. Now more people will read it and not realize it's fundamentally flawed
It's sad that it was published if what you say is true. Now more people will read it and not realize it's fundamentally flawed
#4
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by jgrewe
Wouldn't the fact that the roll center usually lowers more than the CG affect weight transfer?
Roll center doesn't matter. We could weld solid bars in place of our springs and the car would no longer roll, but the exact same weight transfer would still be present because we didn't change CG location, track width or wheelbase.
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jgrewe
...I have not seen the article but the car will require more roll stiffness,either from springs or bars, to corner with the same degree of lean if the RC(s) drop(s) more than the CG. I wonder if he was thinking about Fr/Rr roll centers, as far as I know ther is only one CG. What's on the cover I'll see if I can find the mag.
There are really 3 mass centers to be considered:
1) total mass (predicts total weight transfer)
2) just the sprung mass (predicts weight transfer due to body roll, and due to related shear loads at the roll centers ... not carried through springs)
3) unsprung mass (wheel tire axle brakes ..)
Although many "guides" just use the total mass center, my guru, Fred Puhn, describes all 3 in "how to make your car handle".
It's the August issue.
Trending Topics
#8
Old [Sch|F]ool
Originally Posted by jgrewe
The weight transfer part is where I'm having trouble bringing up data from the old, small hard drive between my ears. I've got to find my old books and reread. Slowly but surely this stuff is coming back after not thinking about it for almost 10 years.
The problem/myth/idea that needs to be beaten into the ground with fire axes, is that people seem to think that body roll = weight transfer.
No.
Lowering the car lowers the CG and reduces weight transfer.
Lowering the car *IN MOST CASES* lowers the roll center faster than the CG drops, making the roll couple (distance between roll center and CG) longer. All else being equal, this means you get more body roll.
I can think of two instances where this is not the case: swingarms where the suspension pivot is parallel to the axle (think front suspension on an old Beetle or 356), because the roll center is the ground no matter what. And, solid axles. Depending on the type of lateral support used, the roll center can stay with the chassis, stay with the axle, or something in between. 1st-gens are awful for lowering because the rear roll center stays with the axle, so when you lower the car, you shorten the rear roll couple. Dramatically. That's why lowering springs don't lower much in the back, tend to be *softer* than stock in the back, and you still want to throw away the rear swaybar...
#9
GET OFF MY LAWN
iTrader: (1)
So the only thing you can do to affect weight transfer is to get the CG as low as you can for any given track width? All the while trying to keep the suspension geometry at angles that keep your roll centers and camber changes etc. etc. doing what you want, where you want, and when. I think I'll skip finding the article after all, I learn(sometimes re-learn) more here.
Last edited by jgrewe; 06-25-05 at 06:41 PM.
#10
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by peejay
.... 1st-gens are awful for lowering because the rear roll center stays with the axle, so when you lower the car, you shorten the rear roll couple. Dramatically. That's why lowering springs don't lower much in the back, tend to be *softer* than stock in the back, and you still want to throw away the rear swaybar...
I had similar issues autoxing and tracking a triumph with rear transverse leaf spring and true swing axles. Final versions of the car had a center pivot connection between ne "swing spring" and frame for about zero rear roll stiffness. I made adjustable 9/16" rear sway bar, easily flexed by hand, to dial in exact roll stiffness needed in rear.
#12
Lives on the Forum
Here's a great article from Mark Ortiz that discusses roll centers and weight transfer:
http://www.auto-ware.com/ubbthreads/...n=0&page=0#602
http://www.auto-ware.com/ubbthreads/...n=0&page=0#602
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM