Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC MAP sensor reference point for different altitudes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 11:50 AM
  #1  
suganuma's Avatar
Thread Starter
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
MAP sensor reference point for different altitudes

in order to prove or disprove a theory i have i need everyone to post 2 numbers.

turn your key so that you have power to the PFC, but dont start the engine.
the numbers i need are:

1. boost/vacuum value
2. altitude you are at ASL

TIA,
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 01:17 PM
  #2  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
I will be out tuning my car today and I live at almost sealevel so I will post later today.
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
Vac reading w/ engine off: -35 mmhg

Altitude: 100-120 ft. above sea level





to find you sea level go to:

http://www.topozone.com/

and enter your city in the Place Name Search
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 03:32 PM
  #4  
Roadracing7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
I got -23 mmHg at 314 ft above Sea Level.

Richard
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 04:01 PM
  #5  
rexman7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Monroe,LA
-20 mmhg @ 74' ASL
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 10:25 PM
  #6  
Roadracing7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
Did some quick research on the way home tonight. Found that my Defi gauge that I stood by is not as accurate as I thought. It read a peak hold of ~14.5 lbs (PFC is set to pri=0.80, sec=0.75), while the pfc read a peak of 0.83 (roughly 12.2 lbs). Above is my vacuum at feet above sea level with engine off. Just so you have some more numbers to play with, have fun.

Richard
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 07:40 AM
  #7  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
I live in SW Houston, the city of Meadows Place,
which is between Houston and Stafford. It's elevation is not listed on the site for elevation.
But you know Houston is very low.

My map sensor voltages at the sensor output match what the PFC dipslays. My test values.


PIM_________PSI______PSI______PSI Diff
Voltage__Autometer____PFC
------------------------------------
2.64_________0_______-.5_______-.5
3.33_________5_______4.6_______.4
3.91________10_______9.5_______.5
4.23________12______11.2_______.8
4.43________14.25____13.0______1.25

Last edited by cewrx7r1; Dec 11, 2001 at 07:44 AM.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 07:45 PM
  #8  
7 eleven's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
112 ft asl -18mmhg
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
Anyone ever try connecting the vacuum line for the boost gauge at different outlets? Maybe the nipples at where the extension manifold meets the intake manifold produces slightly more pressure than the nipple that the map sensor normally plugs into. Maybe we should try using the exact same vacuum sorce for both the boost gauge and the map sensor, then see if the readings vary.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 09:19 PM
  #10  
suganuma's Avatar
Thread Starter
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
ive run both out of the nipple on the UIM and both across the hose from the throttle body which is where the MAP usually reads from.

my readings did not differ
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 09:23 PM
  #11  
suganuma's Avatar
Thread Starter
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
I live in SW Houston, the city of Meadows Place,
which is between Houston and Stafford. It's elevation is not listed on the site for elevation.
But you know Houston is very low.

My map sensor voltages at the sensor output match what the PFC dipslays. My test values.


PIM_________PSI______PSI______PSI Diff
Voltage__Autometer____PFC
------------------------------------
2.64_________0_______-.5_______-.5
3.33_________5_______4.6_______.4
3.91________10_______9.5_______.5
4.23________12______11.2_______.8
4.43________14.25____13.0______1.25

chuck, i keep hearing different things. what is the PIM voltage? is that coming from a pressure source/sensor? last i was being told is that it had something to do with the fuel system. are you trying to say we should play with the PIM voltage value or is the PIM voltage the voltage reading coming from the MAP sensor to the PFC.

thanks
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 12:20 AM
  #12  
machinehead's Avatar
kortez
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks Ca
On the sensor display screen you will see pimm voltage. It is the voltage coming out of the map sensor. What that shows is that the PFC is reading correctly but its display does not match what it is reading....
right Chuck?
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 08:22 AM
  #13  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Page 35 of the manual.
PIM voltage is the map/pressutre sensor output voltage.
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 12:34 AM
  #14  
7-sins's Avatar
thats not paint....
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 2
From: Manassas, VA
+.26 kg/cm2
310ft ASL

I think my map sensor is f*ed. Got to test those voltages.
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 01:26 PM
  #15  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
today it's different

Okay today I get -23 mmhg at the same place that I got -35 mmhg just the other day. Earlyer today i was down at the beach, probably 10ft above sea level and I got -20 mmhg.
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 02:26 PM
  #16  
Roadracing7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
Check the weather channel, I'll bet you had a low pressure move though. All the change means is barometric pressure... That's why it's so hard to put a finger on altitude and vacuum reading.

Richard
Old Dec 14, 2001 | 04:10 PM
  #17  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,201
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
I'm at 800 ft with the PFC showing -48mmhg today.

Tim Benton
Old Dec 15, 2001 | 12:48 AM
  #18  
7-sins's Avatar
thats not paint....
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 2
From: Manassas, VA
Its funny how I am the only one with pressure insted of vacuum. I just checked my MAP voltages today, they were fine. Anyone have an idea?
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 08:50 PM
  #19  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,201
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
So how does all the new numbers stack up? Do they disprove or prove your theory? Just curious?

Tim Benton
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 02:34 AM
  #20  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,201
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
Just bumping it back up. Any final thoughts with the new data?

Tim Benton
Old Jan 12, 2002 | 04:15 PM
  #21  
suganuma's Avatar
Thread Starter
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
well....for a while everything seemed to be falling into place with the theory behind it. a lot of responses went against it and i wasnt getting any real or "good" data. it was all sort of erratic. might be due to different setups and environmental conditions.....but some of those differences....they were pretty strange.

it seemed to be somewhat accurate for my car when i jotted down the #s though....if that means anything....

it still seems like to me that its a factor - the vacuum on the PFC has 3 digits....seems like youd be able to see the difference in atmospheric pressure to me.

i cant get good #s right now though b/c my engine has a crazy surging idle/dying idle vacuum leak that i havent found yet b/c i havent been home to mess with it in a while. *(pray its just a vacuum leak...)

im too busy with school right now to really research this any further.....if anyone else wants to head up on it though - go right ahead.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sen2two
AEM EMS
9
Oct 23, 2015 07:51 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
Aug 15, 2015 08:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.