Turbine Engine
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbine Engine
What do you guys think about put this kind of engine on FD?
http://www.conklinsystems.com/firebird/mlife.shtml
http://www.conklinsystems.com/firebird/mlife.shtml
#2
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
LOL, that engine is an old piece of junk. You could beat that power level with a 13BT.
You could use a more modern turbine engine for better results. The problems would be the cost (initial and upkeep) and the noise. A transmission isn't going to be cheap, either.
You could use a more modern turbine engine for better results. The problems would be the cost (initial and upkeep) and the noise. A transmission isn't going to be cheap, either.
#3
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Originally Posted by cafcwest
Before you non-aviation guys come up with any more engine ideas, I guess I should make a better recommendation: The P&W PT6 is good for about 500-1600hp, it's very easy to find a mechanic (unlike the rotary engine, lol), you can choose from several transmissions, and it's relatively cheap and easy to maintain as far as turbine engines go. You can get a really nice one for about $200,000 to 250,000 USD.
http://www.bcam.net/engines/pwpt6.htm
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
LOL, that's an APU, not a powerplant. It's only good for about 200bhp, as it is intended for starting the aircraft engines, or running the aircraft systems while the main engines are off. Using that APU in an RX-7 would be like replacing the 13B-REW with a big electric starter or an air conditioning compressor.
Before you non-aviation guys come up with any more engine ideas, I guess I should make a better recommendation: The P&W PT6 is good for about 500-1600hp, it's very easy to find a mechanic (unlike the rotary engine, lol), you can choose from several transmissions, and it's relatively cheap and easy to maintain as far as turbine engines go. You can get a really nice one for about $200,000 to 250,000 USD.
http://www.bcam.net/engines/pwpt6.htm
Before you non-aviation guys come up with any more engine ideas, I guess I should make a better recommendation: The P&W PT6 is good for about 500-1600hp, it's very easy to find a mechanic (unlike the rotary engine, lol), you can choose from several transmissions, and it's relatively cheap and easy to maintain as far as turbine engines go. You can get a really nice one for about $200,000 to 250,000 USD.
http://www.bcam.net/engines/pwpt6.htm
Must have been my nubi-ness.....of two plus years.
If I really wanted someting like this, I think the best first step is to call Mr. Breedlove and pull the Spirit of America out of the barn.
Trending Topics
#8
Buy my car.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Whitinsville, MA
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbine engines have terrible throttle response. There was an article in Automobile magazine a few years ago about a turbine-powered race car; their solution to throttle response was to run on a giant torque convertor and set idle speed to be something crazy like 60% throttle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetlude
Single Turbo RX-7's
4
08-18-15 04:53 PM