Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

Chevy Direct injection v-6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-11, 08:03 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
iamsisyphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Surry, NH
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chevy Direct injection v-6

Any thoughts on transplanting this motor? I have an 89 convertible and could sure use 312 horsepower with low end torque. Not to mention the gas mileage would be around 30.

Doug
Old 05-14-11, 01:12 PM
  #2  
I'm only asking questions

iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
What kind of thoughts are you looking for?
Old 05-16-11, 07:16 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
iamsisyphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Surry, NH
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
What kind of thoughts are you looking for?
I know there aren't any kits yet, but would it be technically much different from an LS1 swap? What would the trade offs be? The usual.
Old 05-16-11, 07:34 AM
  #4  
Mother****ing Wow
 
sunburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The LS swap is well documented and would prob be easier on your wallet.

I hear reports of 28-30mph on the hwy in swapped FC/FD
Old 05-16-11, 08:46 AM
  #5  
I'm only asking questions

iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by sunburn
I hear reports of 28-30mph on the hwy in swapped FC/FD
That's why I went with the 2J... 190mph+!

Old 05-16-11, 08:47 AM
  #6  
Mother****ing Wow
 
sunburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
That's why I went with the 2J... 190mph+!

FYI

this mileage is pretty well documented... it's all bout how you drive -NOT the engine.
Old 05-16-11, 10:24 AM
  #7  
RX-347

iTrader: (2)
 
digitalsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not really a great fit, but I'm sure it could be done. Engine control and fueling are going to be challenging.

A 5.3L LS will get about the same milage, same or more power, and is a lot cheaper/easier to do.
Old 05-16-11, 12:23 PM
  #8  
I'm only asking questions

iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by sunburn
FYI

this mileage is pretty well documented... it's all bout how you drive -NOT the engine.
Sorry, I was poking fun at the MPH vs. MPG.
Old 05-16-11, 01:13 PM
  #9  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
The stock GM ECU will probably freak out because it is missing so many inputs data bus inputs
Old 06-18-11, 06:48 AM
  #10  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx
The stock GM ECU will probably freak out because it is missing so many inputs data bus inputs
All of that can be removed during tuning.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
10-06-15 12:28 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
10-02-15 07:56 PM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
10-01-15 11:53 PM
jarjarbinks
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
09-25-15 11:03 PM



Quick Reply: Chevy Direct injection v-6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.