Superchargers
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC & Sag Harbor, NY
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Superchargers
I have a very low mileage (11,700 miles) 1988 Series 4 RX-7 convertible and would like to know the plus and minuses of maybe installing a supercharger. Would the supercharger unit in any way harm the engine or cause it to overheat in the summer and would it effect my gas mileage? Also, and more importantly, would it over stress the engine or existing drive train? Any thoughts would be appreciated...........
Thanks
Thanks
#4
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd imagine you'd be fine for the most part, though it really depends how much boost you were planning to run. anywhere from 6 to 10 psi should be okay on stock components.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power.
If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power.
If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC & Sag Harbor, NY
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharger
I'd imagine you'd be fine for the most part, though it really depends how much boost you were planning to run. anywhere from 6 to 10 psi should be okay on stock components.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power.
If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power.
If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it.
The RX-7 convertible is a terrific car but frankly rather slow from a standing start - power doesn't really come on until somewhere around 60-70 MPH. Price aside any recommendations as to which supercharger make I should consider and what additional (other) components should I upgrade for a supercharger installation?
Thanks
#6
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
Dennis,
The RX-7 convertible is a terrific car but frankly rather slow from a standing start - power doesn't really come on until somewhere around 60-70 MPH. Price aside any recommendations as to which supercharger make I should consider and what additional (other) components should I upgrade for a supercharger installation?
Thanks
Rotary >Pistons
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, like I said, I have the same car, so I know where you're coming from on the speed issue.
I don't know a whole lot about superchargers, if I had the money, I'd definitely throw it down to do a set-up though. I was planning to stick to N/A and do all of the bolt-ons, do a streeport, and other upgrades like flywheel. It'll be quick enough for me, and the car will handle even better.
I don't know a whole lot about superchargers, if I had the money, I'd definitely throw it down to do a set-up though. I was planning to stick to N/A and do all of the bolt-ons, do a streeport, and other upgrades like flywheel. It'll be quick enough for me, and the car will handle even better.
Trending Topics
#9
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
1) Turbosupercharger (called a "turbocharger" or "turbo" for short) - An exhaust-driven turbine with a shaft that spins a centrifugal air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool, quiets the exhaust noise, no drive belt. Disadvantage: There is a "lag" in the time between pressing the gas pedal and the turbo producing boost.
2) Centrifugal supercharger - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a centrifugal air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool. Disadvantages: Slow boost rise, drive belt reduces engine power.
3) Roots supercharger (usually called a "blower") - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a twin-lobe air pump. The air pumps through the intake system until it hits a restriction in the intake manifold, where is compresses. Advantage: Fast boost rise. Disadvantages: Low boost pressure, poor thermal efficiency, difficult to intercool, drive belt reduces engine power.
4) Lysholm supercharger (also called a twin-screw) - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a twin-screw air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool, fast boost rise. Disadvantages: High cost, drive belt reduces engine power.
Given the high exhaust energy of the rotary engine, a turbosupercharger is usually the preferred type of forced induction.
You can get a decent aftermarket all-aluminum radiator for about $300-350. Given that a supercharger setup is going to cost you between $6,000 and $20,000, the radiator is peanuts, and you can even install it yourself in about an hour. Besides, the stock radiator sucks, and even with low mileage you may want to check the top for cracks in the plastic.
Gas mileage at cruise should be about the same, but it will decrease drastically during acceleration.
In that case there is something very wrong with your engine. You should get it fixed before you spend your time and money installing non-essential parts.
#10
Retired Moderator, RIP
iTrader: (142)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes
on
114 Posts
I didn't mean to scare you of when I said get the flame suit on!
Just,personally,if I wanted the power of a supercharger I would go turbo.
The reason is that a whole Turbo engine can be had for the price of a supercharger.Maybe less.
Just,personally,if I wanted the power of a supercharger I would go turbo.
The reason is that a whole Turbo engine can be had for the price of a supercharger.Maybe less.
#12
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
+ The Nelson/Paxton kit is out of production, and the kit was flawed anyway.
+ A good custom setup is way too expensive for most people on this forum.
+ A convertible is not the best platform for a fast RX-7.
+ Most people on this forum cringe when a good, low-mileage car is molested.
Were I in the situation of the OP, I would get the engine fixed by a professional, sell the car, and buy a ghetto-molested Turbo II that has been pre-ruined by some wanna-be drifter. Car Math: A $4,000 Turbo II + $10,000 in shift mad quick yo dorifto mods = a car with a $2,500 resale value. It is much smarter to buy a car from the wanna-be drifter who ruins his car as opposed to being the wanna-be drifter who ruins his car.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC & Sag Harbor, NY
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK - based on your responses to my questions about supercharging my RX-7, I've decided to keep my convertible just as it came from the factory. I guess it really doesn't make much sense messing around with a stock engine for better performance. Buying a fixer-upper makes much more sense and certainly much cheaper in the long run.
Thanks to everyone who responded to my thread.
Thanks to everyone who responded to my thread.
#14
Retired Moderator, RIP
iTrader: (142)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes
on
114 Posts
Well I have seen 1500 dollar complete used SC's on the forum For Sale.Also complete drop in engines for 800.
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget.
Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort.
..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice.
Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!"
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget.
Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort.
..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice.
Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!"
#15
I already got roasted for asking the same question, so I wont roast. It just seems adding a supercharger would fill the low end power and torque void on na RE's.
Last edited by S4 Vert; 01-23-13 at 11:05 PM.
#17
Top Down, Boost Up
iTrader: (7)
Well I have seen 1500 dollar complete used SC's on the forum For Sale.Also complete drop in engines for 800.
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget.
Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort.
..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice.
Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!"
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget.
Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort.
..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice.
Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!"
#18
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Besides the fuel, the shade tree mechanics use the wrong size of supercharger, they chum the supercharger because they forget that a rotary engine does not redline at 5,500rpm like a piston engine, they try to get too much boost out of a Roots blower that was never intended to produce more than 12psi boost, they do not have the skill to align the pulleys, they incorrectly intercool a Roots blower, they try to install a BOV on a centrifugal supercharger, they try to "twin-charge" their engine backwards, and sometimes they even get it to work but are not happy with the results because they didn't realize that the belt saps 40hp from the engine. There are many other stories that I can't recall at the moment, but I think that gives a good rundown of what happens when you don't know what you are doing and you are too cheap to pay a professional to do it for you.
#21
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
A supercharger does not produce any power. It increases the density of the air that is going into the engine. The resulting power that is produced by the engine will vary based on several factors such as engine displacement, engine rpm, the amount that the air is compressed, the heat generated by the compression, the heat rejected by intercoolers or other parts of the engine, the power required to run the supercharger, the ignition timing, the air-fuel ratio, the ability of the exhaust to scavenge the extra flow, the ambient temperature and pressure, and other factors.
#22
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (5)
My street-ported supercharged 13b put down 227 rwhp and 180 ft lbs torque.
Feels fast, torquey and impressive. However, for little more than I invested in all my supercharged aspirations I could have easily had 300-350 rwhp with a turbo and good standalone.
Next venture, to be done with my donor gslse, is a v8 swap. Testing out a 327 that I'll build which should produce 350+ hp and 360+ ft lbs torque plus nitrous.
Feels fast, torquey and impressive. However, for little more than I invested in all my supercharged aspirations I could have easily had 300-350 rwhp with a turbo and good standalone.
Next venture, to be done with my donor gslse, is a v8 swap. Testing out a 327 that I'll build which should produce 350+ hp and 360+ ft lbs torque plus nitrous.
#23
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
My street-ported supercharged 13b put down 227 rwhp and 180 ft lbs torque.
Feels fast, torquey and impressive. However, for little more than I invested in all my supercharged aspirations I could have easily had 300-350 rwhp with a turbo and good standalone.
Next venture, to be done with my donor gslse, is a v8 swap. Testing out a 327 that I'll build which should produce 350+ hp and 360+ ft lbs torque plus nitrous.
Rotary >Pistons
#24
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
#25
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
I speak from having a couple years of hands-on experience with the centrifugal Paxton-Nelson kit. Most of what I can't do on my own in my garage ws done by Defined Autoworks here in Columbus, OH.
Regarding the Paxton/Nelson: In a sentence, it's very poor bang for your buck, but is quite a fun kit to run. You can pick up a kit here for $1000-1500 if you're patient. I got my full Paxton kit for $1000 with an oil cooler, but had to source the appropriate pulley. To safely run this $1000 kit, you're going to want to spent $1k+ on a standalone, and another $1k+ on installation plus tuning. Unless you're going with an oversized (lower-boost) I would also strongly suggested a better fuel pump, and 550cc (I think) injectors, so that's a few hundred more. With the stock pulley on stock ports, you can expect to see around 215hp to the wheels, and a surprisingly flat torque curve. However, running the stock 9lb pulley puts a fair bit of stress on the engine.
In short, as EvilAviator (who knows his stuff) said, the kit is truly flawed.
For the same $3500+ you'd spend on properly running that kit, if you're smart, you can probably do a decent S4TII engine with a nice turbo and standalone. This will probably make more power, and will be MUCH better suited to further modification.
With all that said, I wouldn't trade my idiotic supercharger setup for the world. I love it, I love how fast the boost comes on (even though you can get quick boost with modern turbos.) I love the power delivery at high RPMs. I personally love working with it, and wouldn't give it up for anything. But I'm daft and have more money than sense (and I don't have that much money.)
Regarding the Paxton/Nelson: In a sentence, it's very poor bang for your buck, but is quite a fun kit to run. You can pick up a kit here for $1000-1500 if you're patient. I got my full Paxton kit for $1000 with an oil cooler, but had to source the appropriate pulley. To safely run this $1000 kit, you're going to want to spent $1k+ on a standalone, and another $1k+ on installation plus tuning. Unless you're going with an oversized (lower-boost) I would also strongly suggested a better fuel pump, and 550cc (I think) injectors, so that's a few hundred more. With the stock pulley on stock ports, you can expect to see around 215hp to the wheels, and a surprisingly flat torque curve. However, running the stock 9lb pulley puts a fair bit of stress on the engine.
In short, as EvilAviator (who knows his stuff) said, the kit is truly flawed.
For the same $3500+ you'd spend on properly running that kit, if you're smart, you can probably do a decent S4TII engine with a nice turbo and standalone. This will probably make more power, and will be MUCH better suited to further modification.
With all that said, I wouldn't trade my idiotic supercharger setup for the world. I love it, I love how fast the boost comes on (even though you can get quick boost with modern turbos.) I love the power delivery at high RPMs. I personally love working with it, and wouldn't give it up for anything. But I'm daft and have more money than sense (and I don't have that much money.)