Superchargers
I have a very low mileage (11,700 miles) 1988 Series 4 RX-7 convertible and would like to know the plus and minuses of maybe installing a supercharger. Would the supercharger unit in any way harm the engine or cause it to overheat in the summer and would it effect my gas mileage? Also, and more importantly, would it over stress the engine or existing drive train? Any thoughts would be appreciated...........
Thanks |
Play nice people.
Evan,get your flame suit on! |
Would it effect your gas mileage?!!!... Yes. Research. Use the search bar and you'll come up with plenty of info. Promise.
|
I'd imagine you'd be fine for the most part, though it really depends how much boost you were planning to run. anywhere from 6 to 10 psi should be okay on stock components.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power. If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it. |
Supercharger
Originally Posted by DennisH
(Post 11353981)
I'd imagine you'd be fine for the most part, though it really depends how much boost you were planning to run. anywhere from 6 to 10 psi should be okay on stock components.
I think the existing drive train is good for up to around 250hp or so, the fuel pump is good to around 200hp; so it'd be worth upgrading other components to handle the extra power. If I had the money, I'd probably do a supercharger myself (I have the same car), because it provides more consistent boost, and low-end torque which these cars can really benefit from, so I say go for it. The RX-7 convertible is a terrific car but frankly rather slow from a standing start - power doesn't really come on until somewhere around 60-70 MPH. Price aside any recommendations as to which supercharger make I should consider and what additional (other) components should I upgrade for a supercharger installation? Thanks |
Originally Posted by nyccollector
(Post 11354017)
Dennis, The RX-7 convertible is a terrific car but frankly rather slow from a standing start - power doesn't really come on until somewhere around 60-70 MPH. Price aside any recommendations as to which supercharger make I should consider and what additional (other) components should I upgrade for a supercharger installation? Thanks Rotary >Pistons |
Well, like I said, I have the same car, so I know where you're coming from on the speed issue.
I don't know a whole lot about superchargers, if I had the money, I'd definitely throw it down to do a set-up though. I was planning to stick to N/A and do all of the bolt-ons, do a streeport, and other upgrades like flywheel. It'll be quick enough for me, and the car will handle even better. |
Try doing a search on Google for supercharged rx7 and it should come up with some threads from rx7club
Rotary >Pistons |
Originally Posted by nyccollector
(Post 11353868)
I have a very low mileage (11,700 miles) 1988 Series 4 RX-7 convertible and would like to know the plus and minuses of maybe installing a supercharger.
1) Turbosupercharger (called a "turbocharger" or "turbo" for short) - An exhaust-driven turbine with a shaft that spins a centrifugal air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool, quiets the exhaust noise, no drive belt. Disadvantage: There is a "lag" in the time between pressing the gas pedal and the turbo producing boost. 2) Centrifugal supercharger - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a centrifugal air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool. Disadvantages: Slow boost rise, drive belt reduces engine power. 3) Roots supercharger (usually called a "blower") - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a twin-lobe air pump. The air pumps through the intake system until it hits a restriction in the intake manifold, where is compresses. Advantage: Fast boost rise. Disadvantages: Low boost pressure, poor thermal efficiency, difficult to intercool, drive belt reduces engine power. 4) Lysholm supercharger (also called a twin-screw) - A belt-driven pulley attached to a gear drive that spins a twin-screw air compressor. Advantages: Capable of high boost pressure, good thermal efficiency, easy to intercool, fast boost rise. Disadvantages: High cost, drive belt reduces engine power. Given the high exhaust energy of the rotary engine, a turbosupercharger is usually the preferred type of forced induction.
Originally Posted by nyccollector
(Post 11353868)
Would the supercharger unit in any way harm the engine or cause it to overheat in the summer and would it effect my gas mileage?
You can get a decent aftermarket all-aluminum radiator for about $300-350. Given that a supercharger setup is going to cost you between $6,000 and $20,000, the radiator is peanuts, and you can even install it yourself in about an hour. Besides, the stock radiator sucks, and even with low mileage you may want to check the top for cracks in the plastic. Gas mileage at cruise should be about the same, but it will decrease drastically during acceleration.
Originally Posted by nyccollector
(Post 11353868)
Also, and more importantly, would it over stress the engine or existing drive train?
Originally Posted by nyccollector
(Post 11354017)
power doesn't really come on until somewhere around 60-70 MPH.
|
I didn't mean to scare you of when I said get the flame suit on!
Just,personally,if I wanted the power of a supercharger I would go turbo. The reason is that a whole Turbo engine can be had for the price of a supercharger.Maybe less. |
I was gonna say the same thing. Stock engines with turbos already attached are pretty easy to come by.
|
Originally Posted by misterstyx69
(Post 11354278)
The reason is that a whole Turbo engine can be had for the price of a supercharger.Maybe less.
+ The Nelson/Paxton kit is out of production, and the kit was flawed anyway. + A good custom setup is way too expensive for most people on this forum. + A convertible is not the best platform for a fast RX-7. + Most people on this forum cringe when a good, low-mileage car is molested. Were I in the situation of the OP, I would get the engine fixed by a professional, sell the car, and buy a ghetto-molested Turbo II that has been pre-ruined by some wanna-be drifter. Car Math: A $4,000 Turbo II + $10,000 in shift mad quick yo dorifto mods = a car with a $2,500 resale value. It is much smarter to buy a car from the wanna-be drifter who ruins his car as opposed to being the wanna-be drifter who ruins his car. ;) |
OK - based on your responses to my questions about supercharging my RX-7, I've decided to keep my convertible just as it came from the factory. I guess it really doesn't make much sense messing around with a stock engine for better performance. Buying a fixer-upper makes much more sense and certainly much cheaper in the long run.
Thanks to everyone who responded to my thread. |
Well I have seen 1500 dollar complete used SC's on the forum For Sale.Also complete drop in engines for 800.
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget. Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort. ..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice. Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" |
I already got roasted for asking the same question, so I wont roast. It just seems adding a supercharger would fill the low end power and torque void on na RE's.
|
The availability and knowledge on turbo 7's is so much more it would be better obviously. A blower would be efficient but it will be more pricey and less fuel efficient no matter what.
|
Originally Posted by misterstyx69
(Post 11354405)
Well I have seen 1500 dollar complete used SC's on the forum For Sale.Also complete drop in engines for 800.
I wouldn't really be worrying about overheating the engine,I would be worrying about Pissing off your Budget. Even if you get a supercharger you have to run Fuel.That would require a ECU of some sort. ..at least with a stock TII engine and harness,the Stock ECU could suffice. Then you could build on the TII keg for more power as you get more Funds in that Quest For the "Big WEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" |
Originally Posted by dream3rdgen
(Post 11354653)
A blower would be efficient but it will be more pricey and less fuel efficient no matter what.
Originally Posted by RotaryRocket88
(Post 11354951)
it seems to have been the kiss of death for the engine due to half-assing the fuel/fuel control
|
Been there done that, and have that...camden that is.
My advice, atkins 5th&6th port sleeves and a rb streetport exhaust system and that's it. |
What kinda power does a supercharger givd
|
Originally Posted by Aleda21
(Post 11370316)
What kinda power does a supercharger givd
|
Originally Posted by Aleda21
(Post 11370316)
What kinda power does a supercharger givd
Feels fast, torquey and impressive. However, for little more than I invested in all my supercharged aspirations I could have easily had 300-350 rwhp with a turbo and good standalone. Next venture, to be done with my donor gslse, is a v8 swap. Testing out a 327 that I'll build which should produce 350+ hp and 360+ ft lbs torque plus nitrous. |
Originally Posted by 84stock
(Post 11370499)
My street-ported supercharged 13b put down 227 rwhp and 180 ft lbs torque. Feels fast, torquey and impressive. However, for little more than I invested in all my supercharged aspirations I could have easily had 300-350 rwhp with a turbo and good standalone. Next venture, to be done with my donor gslse, is a v8 swap. Testing out a 327 that I'll build which should produce 350+ hp and 360+ ft lbs torque plus nitrous. Rotary >Pistons |
Originally Posted by wthdidusay82
(Post 11370515)
I want to see a supercharger and turbo at the same time that'd be impressive
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/9540/41093080zn1.jpg http://insertcointobegin.com/wp-cont...Skyline_1_.jpg http://horsepowercalculators.net/wp-...harged-sti.jpg |
I speak from having a couple years of hands-on experience with the centrifugal Paxton-Nelson kit. Most of what I can't do on my own in my garage ws done by Defined Autoworks here in Columbus, OH.
Regarding the Paxton/Nelson: In a sentence, it's very poor bang for your buck, but is quite a fun kit to run. You can pick up a kit here for $1000-1500 if you're patient. I got my full Paxton kit for $1000 with an oil cooler, but had to source the appropriate pulley. To safely run this $1000 kit, you're going to want to spent $1k+ on a standalone, and another $1k+ on installation plus tuning. Unless you're going with an oversized (lower-boost) I would also strongly suggested a better fuel pump, and 550cc (I think) injectors, so that's a few hundred more. With the stock pulley on stock ports, you can expect to see around 215hp to the wheels, and a surprisingly flat torque curve. However, running the stock 9lb pulley puts a fair bit of stress on the engine. In short, as EvilAviator (who knows his stuff) said, the kit is truly flawed. For the same $3500+ you'd spend on properly running that kit, if you're smart, you can probably do a decent S4TII engine with a nice turbo and standalone. This will probably make more power, and will be MUCH better suited to further modification. With all that said, I wouldn't trade my idiotic supercharger setup for the world. I love it, I love how fast the boost comes on (even though you can get quick boost with modern turbos.) I love the power delivery at high RPMs. I personally love working with it, and wouldn't give it up for anything. But I'm daft and have more money than sense (and I don't have that much money.) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands