Intake Manifold's Semi PP and a few question's
#51
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers man, Yep can adjust TPS on handset, Easy as Looking at this 80mm TB, Look's the same as the one's on e.bay, Quality is my only concern, Maybe just have to get it and try it ...
#52
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looking good mate,as long as the nissin tps is a varible reisistor type(im pretty sure it is)then you wont have any issuse using it with the microtech,you will just have to reset the microtechs tps zones so it reads 0-100% throttle correctly,if youve got a laptop and the microtech software or a hand controler its real easy to do!!
#53
talking head
here is one i did a few years ago under similar concepts ,,
this manifold was used on a turbo hybrid 6p FC engine and is now on a turbo hybrid GSL-SE engine
both engines ran LPG mixer
it runs a 65mm single blade TB from a local GM V6
power under 3000 rpm sucked ,, depends on how well you feed it tip in throttle
power 3000-6000 rpm is not discernable from stock,, but power 6 K and upwards is definately much better
( i run the same FC engine now on modded stock T2 manifolds and TB with same mixer set up )
the stock manifolds and TB are better under 3K ,, the plenum ( which is 2.6- 3L ) is better above 6 K
this manifold was used on a turbo hybrid 6p FC engine and is now on a turbo hybrid GSL-SE engine
both engines ran LPG mixer
it runs a 65mm single blade TB from a local GM V6
power under 3000 rpm sucked ,, depends on how well you feed it tip in throttle
power 3000-6000 rpm is not discernable from stock,, but power 6 K and upwards is definately much better
( i run the same FC engine now on modded stock T2 manifolds and TB with same mixer set up )
the stock manifolds and TB are better under 3K ,, the plenum ( which is 2.6- 3L ) is better above 6 K
Last edited by bumpstart; 04-05-11 at 07:11 AM.
#55
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.
#56
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.
that thing will never go
stop changing it every 2 months and drive the bitch
and no im not finshed maize and shooting, they are better than tuning it for you again hahahhahaha
and go turbo and grab your ***** back out of jodys hand bag
#58
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.
#60
Old [Sch|F]ool
Was at a friend's place the other night checking out rotary bits...
The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better
With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.
We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!
I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better
With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.
We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!
I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
#61
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Was at a friend's place the other night checking out rotary bits...
The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better
With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.
We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!
I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better
With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.
We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!
I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
#62
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow man that looks so wicked nice... I have being thinking for a wile to make my engine semi pp but couldn't find any intakes or throttles cause i want it full injection so i gave up the idea but now I'm pumped again... can you give me any advise eon how to make it right i want the car for Drift and Circuit...
Towed it out to a mate's place last weekend, Put a old fuel map in my ecu from age's ago, Adjusted it a bit then went for a thrash up the road, afr's are about 11.5 so i need more of a tune, It idle's at 1500rpm, Dosn't sound like a bridge port at idle, Sound's like crap really, But when driving it, Down low it's lost a bit over the old manifold but after 4k it starts getting better and dosn't seem to flatten out past 7k anymore and just want's to rev, It has done what i wanted it too so more tuning should make it better
#63
Old [Sch|F]ool
Just like people putting 550 or 720cc injectors on the secondary side, because the computer doesn't overfuel enough I guess...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM