Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Intake Manifold's Semi PP and a few question's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 04:28 PM
  #51  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Cheers man, Yep can adjust TPS on handset, Easy as Looking at this 80mm TB, Look's the same as the one's on e.bay, Quality is my only concern, Maybe just have to get it and try it ...

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 05:09 AM
  #52  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Originally Posted by rotatrix
looking good mate,as long as the nissin tps is a varible reisistor type(im pretty sure it is)then you wont have any issuse using it with the microtech,you will just have to reset the microtechs tps zones so it reads 0-100% throttle correctly,if youve got a laptop and the microtech software or a hand controler its real easy to do!!
I got a new Nissan TPS, Wired it into my microtech tonight to try it and it work's mint, Now just waiting on manifold .....

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 07:06 AM
  #53  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
here is one i did a few years ago under similar concepts ,,
this manifold was used on a turbo hybrid 6p FC engine and is now on a turbo hybrid GSL-SE engine
both engines ran LPG mixer

it runs a 65mm single blade TB from a local GM V6
power under 3000 rpm sucked ,, depends on how well you feed it tip in throttle
power 3000-6000 rpm is not discernable from stock,, but power 6 K and upwards is definately much better
( i run the same FC engine now on modded stock T2 manifolds and TB with same mixer set up )

the stock manifolds and TB are better under 3K ,, the plenum ( which is 2.6- 3L ) is better above 6 K


Last edited by bumpstart; Apr 5, 2011 at 07:11 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 03:09 PM
  #54  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
^ Weird crazy stuff!!! I like it!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 07:24 AM
  #55  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.



Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 02:26 PM
  #56  
mattmarrx3's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: nz
Originally Posted by S1sevenNZ
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.





that thing will never go

stop changing it every 2 months and drive the bitch
and no im not finshed maize and shooting, they are better than tuning it for you again hahahhahaha

and go turbo and grab your ***** back out of jodys hand bag
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 05:03 PM
  #57  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Thank's Matt but na i like the n/a better haha.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 11:27 PM
  #58  
Benyto's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: puerto rico
Originally Posted by S1sevenNZ
Haha that's nice bump start ! Just finished mine tonight, Battery on charge and will start her tomorrow arvo, No reg or wof so cant go for drive ! Will just play with idle setting's for now untill i sort out my air filter system and go for wof again one day if all work's out ok.



Wow man that looks so wicked nice... I have being thinking for a wile to make my engine semi pp but couldn't find any intakes or throttles cause i want it full injection so i gave up the idea but now I'm pumped again... can you give me any advise eon how to make it right i want the car for Drift and Circuit...
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #59  
ArmyOfOne's Avatar
Bridge Port Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
From: Alzey, Germany
Real nice work on that intake.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 01:40 PM
  #60  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Was at a friend's place the other night checking out rotary bits...

The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better

With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.

We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!

I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 11:00 PM
  #61  
ultimatejay's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 4
From: California
Originally Posted by peejay
Was at a friend's place the other night checking out rotary bits...

The only stock manifold that looks worse than the T2 manifold was the FD manifold! It's like Mazda decided that putting a curve in the tract was a bad idea and sharp angles would work better

With that manifold on the car, find a N/A manifold and mod it to match up to the 4 port and use the same runner length as your existing manifold to eliminate variables (looks like the throttle would come out about there the alternator is... easy fix for that) and test it out back to back.

We were talking about trying my modded 6-port manifold versus a T2 manifold on his engine dyno. Still might take him up on that!

I better shut up though... I like the idea that N/A manifolds are "worthless", makes them easy to come by!
That's because these manifolds were designed for a turbo application were room was limited. Not that hard to figure out. I don't know why anyone would want to use one on a N/A car, unless they're tightwads like you.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 04:54 AM
  #62  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Originally Posted by Benyto
Wow man that looks so wicked nice... I have being thinking for a wile to make my engine semi pp but couldn't find any intakes or throttles cause i want it full injection so i gave up the idea but now I'm pumped again... can you give me any advise eon how to make it right i want the car for Drift and Circuit...
My only advice would be to search the net for more info and go and make somthing up and try it, There's to many varible's to say what's right or wrong, I just took a old T2 lower manifold, Cut the back side off it, Got a 5'' by 9'' plenum made and welded it to it, Then added a 80mm throttle body, It's now running 4x 550cc injector's.

Towed it out to a mate's place last weekend, Put a old fuel map in my ecu from age's ago, Adjusted it a bit then went for a thrash up the road, afr's are about 11.5 so i need more of a tune, It idle's at 1500rpm, Dosn't sound like a bridge port at idle, Sound's like crap really, But when driving it, Down low it's lost a bit over the old manifold but after 4k it starts getting better and dosn't seem to flatten out past 7k anymore and just want's to rev, It has done what i wanted it too so more tuning should make it better

Reply
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 07:39 PM
  #63  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by ultimatejay
That's because these manifolds were designed for a turbo application were room was limited. Not that hard to figure out. I don't know why anyone would want to use one on a N/A car, unless they're tightwads like you.
I don't know why people want them on N/A cars either, but people "port match" them to open them up to 6-port openings, which should make them flow even worse, really. I think the logic involved is "The Turbo engines made more power and the runners are shorter, DURR of course it is better!" Never mind that all four runners look like the primary (crappy) runners of the old carbureted manifolds, and they needed 5-6psi boost to make a couple dozen more horsepower.

Just like people putting 550 or 720cc injectors on the secondary side, because the computer doesn't overfuel enough I guess...
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 06:32 AM
  #64  
mattmarrx3's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: nz
so when are we going to run out of brakes again and use more gas in it, or am i going to do a road tune on the 3 first cos it goes to 9.5 at 5-15 psi lol

come on dan
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #65  
S1sevenNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Maybe in june see how it goes haha, You can tune the 3 first, Lean it out and **** urself
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.