Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

comments on my porting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
RX200013B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: idaho
comments on my porting

let the criticism begin! this will be a n/a motor using a REW intake ran by haltech.
with adaptor plate for mounting of REW intake to block
the bridge will be a little wider and the bridgeport will be a little thinner.
Attached Thumbnails comments on my porting-dscf6534.jpg   comments on my porting-dscf6538.jpg   comments on my porting-dscf6550.jpg   comments on my porting-dscf6542.jpg   comments on my porting-dscf6552.jpg  

comments on my porting-dscf6568.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 03:07 PM
  #2  
Jimmy2222's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: NL, Canada
6 port bridge huh? GL, I haven't seen it done personally. Don't look too bad though. The bridge on the last pic looks insanely small though.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
89RedsunGTUs's Avatar
Remission Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 249
Likes: 1
From: SLC, Utah
Very Nice. Makes mee feel like i shoulda spent more time reasearchin ports. i wanted a Bridge port so bad, but no templates were avaliable so i went street port instead

Good Job
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #4  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by RX200013B
the bridge will be a little wider and the bridgeport will be a little thinner.
the bridge actually looks a bit on the thin side to me.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
RX200013B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: idaho
Originally Posted by diabolical1
the bridge actually looks a bit on the thin side to me.
this was my practice plate, that's why i said the bridge will be a little wider and the bridge "PORT" will be a little thinner.

anybody else?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #6  
lonetlan's Avatar
Too Many Questions
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: Claremore, Oklahoma
Nice!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 569
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
That looks similar to the port I just did, except I opened the eyebrow closer to the coolant seal and I didn't port the eyebrow or the main window as high up. I'm using a GSL-SE intake manifold.

I'm very pleased with it so far, silly torque everywhere on the tach and it falls flat at around 7000-7500rpm (aux ports are sealed off) which is exactly what I wanted. It's easy to make a high RPM peaky engine, but those aren't very fast on a course.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
Josh83rx7
Build Threads
0
Sep 15, 2015 10:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.