street ported or half bridge ???
#1
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: miami
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
street ported or half bridge ???
street ported or half bridge?? on a s5 all motor fuel injected
im trying to find a thread about it but i cnt find it any opinions??
im trying to find a thread about it but i cnt find it any opinions??
#2
brap brap brap
iTrader: (7)
there is a huge thread under "Rotary Performace"
https://www.rx7club.com/rotary-car-performance-77/bridge-port-over-rated-629931/
https://www.rx7club.com/rotary-car-performance-77/bridge-port-over-rated-629931/
Last edited by AlexG13B; 08-31-07 at 05:28 PM. Reason: found link
#3
With respect to NAs, bridge ports definitely have greater potential. However, I am not a fan of the so-called half-bridge. It's a bit like being half-pregnant. Either you are or you aren't. Even with the secondaries closed the engine still "sees" the port and communicates. If you want a bridge port, just go all the way and have the full benefit. Just be prepared for the compromises and realize that potential does not always equal performance...the whole system needs to work together to realize potential. Just a large streetport, exhaust, 6-port inserts and a S-AFC camt net you 190hp at the wheels with hardly any compromises. A bridgeport may or may not exceed that and the compromises are significant.
#4
Home-brew Rotary
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: GooseCreek SC
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Theres alot of these threads it seems.
Anyway, I too was pondering the same Questions, but I have made up my mind on this kinda subject with my n/a aux-BP plan.
Seem a lot of ppl will tell you to "go all the way" or just go with a good street port.
But what are you looking for, an all motor drag machine, or a street worthy machine??
Anyway, I too was pondering the same Questions, but I have made up my mind on this kinda subject with my n/a aux-BP plan.
Seem a lot of ppl will tell you to "go all the way" or just go with a good street port.
But what are you looking for, an all motor drag machine, or a street worthy machine??
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Riverside
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've personally seen and known bridgeport, both half and full, to be good daily drivers. I have also seen a car get 30 mpg (I DO NOT KNOW HOW). I am, and forever, pick a bridgeport over anything else.
Trending Topics
#8
Street Port
Go with a Street Port you'll much happier in the long run. Most people like to here the BRAP BRAP BRAP crazy idle that Bridge Ports create. But if you ever have to drive the car for long periods of time you will get sick of it eventually. Not to mention if you really want to make power it will have to be loud. At least with a Street Port the exhaust can be somewhat quite, and still make good usable power.
Good Luck
Good Luck
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Freeport, Maine
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i say go bridge. I have a half bridge turbo and it's very very streetable. I don't understand how people can think that they arn't streetable, it is very easy to drive. The only drawbacks i've found have been tuning in vaccum, it's a bitch, and it's ******* loud. Other than that I love it.
#10
i say go bridge. I have a half bridge turbo and it's very very streetable. I don't understand how people can think that they arn't streetable, it is very easy to drive. The only drawbacks i've found have been tuning in vaccum, it's a bitch, and it's ******* loud. Other than that I love it.
#13
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Freeport, Maine
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i agree, i don't take my car out for quik trips at night really because of how loud it is. I do find it to be very reliable though, only problems i've had sense getting it together are I keep popping off intercooler piping/hose's and i have a pretty bad oil leak at the pan right now that I've been putting off fixing. Other than that reliability isn't a problem. But yes starting often takes a bit longer than a stock engine, and High vac has to run a bit richer in order to stay smooth so gas milage goes down. The drivability is great, it's just not always conveniant as a DD. Never have a project as your DD
#14
Cruisin in the whip
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San diego
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with a streetport for reliability issues, and i felt it was easier to just buy a template and do it myself. Now my ports look badass and all i have to do is throw it together...
#17
Hot Dicken's Cider
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, Ohio
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'll love the half-bridge. 90% of the people who say that drivability sucks and a streetport is so much better have never even driven or ridden in a half-bridge and have no idea what they are talking about. I was worried about noise and drivability when I decided to go with it, but now I would never go back to a streetport.
#20
You'll love the half-bridge. 90% of the people who say that drivability sucks and a streetport is so much better have never even driven or ridden in a half-bridge and have no idea what they are talking about. I was worried about noise and drivability when I decided to go with it, but now I would never go back to a streetport.
Here is a dyno sheet of an S5 NA with a large streetport, full exhaust and SAFC: 189.9 RWHP. It won't pass emissions, but it idles smooth and sounds nice and quiet.
All NA half-bridge guys: post your dyno sheets to support your anecdotes. If I can find some, I will then post what a real bridgeport does (we mainly do J-ports, because bridgeports are too limited).
BTW, I personally prefer a peripheral port over a bridgeport...the compromises are similar but the performance difference is night and day. I used to put about 10,000 miles a year on my peripheral port car (8,000 miles to Florida and back, plus a couple thousand just around town), which other than the noise was a dream to drive.
#21
The Silent but Deadly Mod
iTrader: (2)
BTW, I personally prefer a peripheral port over a bridgeport...the compromises are similar but the performance difference is night and day. I used to put about 10,000 miles a year on my peripheral port car (8,000 miles to Florida and back, plus a couple thousand just around town), which other than the noise was a dream to drive.
#22
Calm like a bomb
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drive a T2 half bridge and I hate driving around in it sometimes, it's annoying in traffic, at lights, at stops, and just to much head ache if you drive it daily or even weekend warrior it. The extra power at top end just doesn't make up for the lose at low end driving around wise. Go street port.
#23
BDC Motorsports
#24
Rotors still spinning
iTrader: (1)
The one constant I see among bridgeport owners who drive them on the street is that they are all turbo. It doesn't take much to hit any boost at all and when that happens, your drivablility issues are gone. A turbo also works somewhat as a muffler although they can still get pretty damn loud.
An n/a bridgeport however can't be made quiet without losing an awful lot of performance. It is extremely dependant on intake and exhaust tuning as there is no boost to compensate for it. Boost does wonderful things. If he is still using the stock intake manifold with a bridgeport, he isn't even going to break 200 rwhp and that is attainable without a bridge. Remember this is an n/a S5 we are talking about. Everyone's experience with a turbo bridgeport doesn't really apply to nonturbo cars.
Since he's running fuel injection, it had better be a true standalone and not an R-tek or SAFC. He NEEDS to be running either a Weber or a Holley style intake manifold or equivalent and a true header system with a straight through muffler. It will be worthless without the total setup being matched to it.
An n/a bridgeport however can't be made quiet without losing an awful lot of performance. It is extremely dependant on intake and exhaust tuning as there is no boost to compensate for it. Boost does wonderful things. If he is still using the stock intake manifold with a bridgeport, he isn't even going to break 200 rwhp and that is attainable without a bridge. Remember this is an n/a S5 we are talking about. Everyone's experience with a turbo bridgeport doesn't really apply to nonturbo cars.
Since he's running fuel injection, it had better be a true standalone and not an R-tek or SAFC. He NEEDS to be running either a Weber or a Holley style intake manifold or equivalent and a true header system with a straight through muffler. It will be worthless without the total setup being matched to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post