General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

street ported or half bridge ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #1  
rotatech7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: miami
street ported or half bridge ???

street ported or half bridge?? on a s5 all motor fuel injected
im trying to find a thread about it but i cnt find it any opinions??
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
AlexG13B's Avatar
brap brap brap
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 44
From: Florida
there is a huge thread under "Rotary Performace"

https://www.rx7club.com/rotary-car-performance-77/bridge-port-over-rated-629931/

Last edited by AlexG13B; Aug 31, 2007 at 05:28 PM. Reason: found link
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
Blake's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by xboxthug13b
there is a huge thread under "Rotary Performace"

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=629931
That thread is about turbo bridge ports, which are a completely different animal.

With respect to NAs, bridge ports definitely have greater potential. However, I am not a fan of the so-called half-bridge. It's a bit like being half-pregnant. Either you are or you aren't. Even with the secondaries closed the engine still "sees" the port and communicates. If you want a bridge port, just go all the way and have the full benefit. Just be prepared for the compromises and realize that potential does not always equal performance...the whole system needs to work together to realize potential. Just a large streetport, exhaust, 6-port inserts and a S-AFC camt net you 190hp at the wheels with hardly any compromises. A bridgeport may or may not exceed that and the compromises are significant.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
NoviceRotaryTech.'s Avatar
Home-brew Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: GooseCreek SC
Theres alot of these threads it seems.

Anyway, I too was pondering the same Questions, but I have made up my mind on this kinda subject with my n/a aux-BP plan.
Seem a lot of ppl will tell you to "go all the way" or just go with a good street port.

But what are you looking for, an all motor drag machine, or a street worthy machine??
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #5  
dean23's Avatar
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
Bridge Port and Daily Driver do not belong in the same sentence. they call it a "Street" port for a reason....
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #6  
stupidkid0304's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Riverside
I've personally seen and known bridgeport, both half and full, to be good daily drivers. I have also seen a car get 30 mpg (I DO NOT KNOW HOW). I am, and forever, pick a bridgeport over anything else.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #7  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
i agree with Blake on this. if this is going to be a ported 6-port engine, then streetport it.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #8  
rotaryengineering's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Street Port

Go with a Street Port you'll much happier in the long run. Most people like to here the BRAP BRAP BRAP crazy idle that Bridge Ports create. But if you ever have to drive the car for long periods of time you will get sick of it eventually. Not to mention if you really want to make power it will have to be loud. At least with a Street Port the exhaust can be somewhat quite, and still make good usable power.

Good Luck
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #9  
Dom_C's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Freeport, Maine
i say go bridge. I have a half bridge turbo and it's very very streetable. I don't understand how people can think that they arn't streetable, it is very easy to drive. The only drawbacks i've found have been tuning in vaccum, it's a bitch, and it's ******* loud. Other than that I love it.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #10  
Blake's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Dom_C
i say go bridge. I have a half bridge turbo and it's very very streetable. I don't understand how people can think that they arn't streetable, it is very easy to drive. The only drawbacks i've found have been tuning in vaccum, it's a bitch, and it's ******* loud. Other than that I love it.
Speaking as someone who has driven a Peripheral Port 13B with Weber 51IDA, puck clutch, 4.88 rear end gears, heimed links, full cage, no interior, yadda yadda on an 8,000 mile round trip from Oregon to Florida and back -- pulling a tire/tool trailer -- I can honestly tell you that "streetable" is a matter of interpretation. However, my definition is more about practicality. A daily driver should not be a chore to drive. It needs to have comfort, convenience, economy, etc. A car you don't think twice about firing up at midnight for a quick run to the convenience store without waking up the neighbors, or drive a couple hundred miles to visit your friends or family without concern that it will break down or burn up all your gas money for the month. That's my idea of a daily driver. Your mileage may vary. One of the guys that works for us has a flat black FC that is SLAMMED to the ground, riding on bump stops, with a zip-tied on body kit and no interior. There are parking lots he cannot drive through because of speed bumps or curb-cuts. It rides like a buckboard even on nice, smooth roads and the exhaust is very drony. But it looks cool in his opinion, so it is his daily driver. Personally, I think it's stupid, but that's just me.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #11  
stupidkid0304's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Riverside
I've also driven a bridgeport for a daily driver and found it to have no problems.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #12  
stupidkid0304's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Riverside
^half-bridge
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #13  
Dom_C's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Freeport, Maine
i agree, i don't take my car out for quik trips at night really because of how loud it is. I do find it to be very reliable though, only problems i've had sense getting it together are I keep popping off intercooler piping/hose's and i have a pretty bad oil leak at the pan right now that I've been putting off fixing. Other than that reliability isn't a problem. But yes starting often takes a bit longer than a stock engine, and High vac has to run a bit richer in order to stay smooth so gas milage goes down. The drivability is great, it's just not always conveniant as a DD. Never have a project as your DD
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #14  
Meatkibble's Avatar
Cruisin in the whip
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: San diego
I went with a streetport for reliability issues, and i felt it was easier to just buy a template and do it myself. Now my ports look badass and all i have to do is throw it together...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #15  
rotatech7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: miami
well the engine is done ,half bridge. lets see how it runs..
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #16  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
hope you have a custom intake mani and a standalone to realize that potential......
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #17  
DelSlow's Avatar
Hot Dicken's Cider
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Marion, Ohio
You'll love the half-bridge. 90% of the people who say that drivability sucks and a streetport is so much better have never even driven or ridden in a half-bridge and have no idea what they are talking about. I was worried about noise and drivability when I decided to go with it, but now I would never go back to a streetport.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #18  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
remember, he wants an HBP NA, not an HBP Turbo.....there's no such thing as increased spool response with the HBP NA.


Just curious, what's your mileage on your HBP's? I get 24 highway on my car.....I would think mileage is a very important thing for a DD.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 09:55 AM
  #19  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by Roen
remember, he wants an HBP NA, not an HBP Turbo.....
exactly. much different sound level (inherent muffling) and torque curve.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #20  
Blake's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by DelSlow
You'll love the half-bridge. 90% of the people who say that drivability sucks and a streetport is so much better have never even driven or ridden in a half-bridge and have no idea what they are talking about. I was worried about noise and drivability when I decided to go with it, but now I would never go back to a streetport.
And 90% of people singing the praises of a half-bridge have never driven a full bridge port, and thus don't know that they are making all the compromises and getting only some of the benefit. And, they most likely don't know the full potential of a quality streetport.

Here is a dyno sheet of an S5 NA with a large streetport, full exhaust and SAFC: 189.9 RWHP. It won't pass emissions, but it idles smooth and sounds nice and quiet.



All NA half-bridge guys: post your dyno sheets to support your anecdotes. If I can find some, I will then post what a real bridgeport does (we mainly do J-ports, because bridgeports are too limited).

BTW, I personally prefer a peripheral port over a bridgeport...the compromises are similar but the performance difference is night and day. I used to put about 10,000 miles a year on my peripheral port car (8,000 miles to Florida and back, plus a couple thousand just around town), which other than the noise was a dream to drive.
Attached Thumbnails street ported or half bridge  ???-6pifcdyno1a-s.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #21  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by Blake
BTW, I personally prefer a peripheral port over a bridgeport...the compromises are similar but the performance difference is night and day. I used to put about 10,000 miles a year on my peripheral port car (8,000 miles to Florida and back, plus a couple thousand just around town), which other than the noise was a dream to drive.
Agreed, most people who go BP don't realize that the BP is an inferior port compared to the PP in NA trim. The BP was created to get around the ban on PP's placed on certain classes. PP's make more power, and are also much louder.....if you like that kind of stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #22  
SASSER's Avatar
Calm like a bomb
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
I drive a T2 half bridge and I hate driving around in it sometimes, it's annoying in traffic, at lights, at stops, and just to much head ache if you drive it daily or even weekend warrior it. The extra power at top end just doesn't make up for the lose at low end driving around wise. Go street port.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #23  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by dean23
Bridge Port and Daily Driver do not belong in the same sentence. they call it a "Street" port for a reason....
That's funny. You could've fooled me. Been daily driving me for nearly 3 years now.

B
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #24  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
The one constant I see among bridgeport owners who drive them on the street is that they are all turbo. It doesn't take much to hit any boost at all and when that happens, your drivablility issues are gone. A turbo also works somewhat as a muffler although they can still get pretty damn loud.

An n/a bridgeport however can't be made quiet without losing an awful lot of performance. It is extremely dependant on intake and exhaust tuning as there is no boost to compensate for it. Boost does wonderful things. If he is still using the stock intake manifold with a bridgeport, he isn't even going to break 200 rwhp and that is attainable without a bridge. Remember this is an n/a S5 we are talking about. Everyone's experience with a turbo bridgeport doesn't really apply to nonturbo cars.

Since he's running fuel injection, it had better be a true standalone and not an R-tek or SAFC. He NEEDS to be running either a Weber or a Holley style intake manifold or equivalent and a true header system with a straight through muffler. It will be worthless without the total setup being matched to it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
dillrx7
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Sep 7, 2015 09:38 AM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Sep 5, 2015 12:41 PM
rx7shirley
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Sep 2, 2015 02:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.