Engine Management Forum Use this area for discussing Haltech, Wolf 3D, Power FC, AEM and any other aftermarket ECU upgrades. Help/Questions/Tuning

Why doesn't anyone make a self tuning Stand Alone ECU??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #1  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 261
From: Around
Why doesn't anyone make a self tuning Stand Alone ECU??

I mean, just as an example, lets say it uses and continuously monitors wideband o2 sensor, baro pressure sensor, manifold pressure sensor, abient temp sensor, airflow meter, egt, air intake temp, coolant and oil temp sensors, knock sensors, fuel press sensor, etc etc etc.

Then with this continuous feedback it adjusts itself to meet certain parameters that we input like afr, ignition timing and split, max egt, max knock level, max coolant and oil temps, etc. for various vaccum, boost, rpm and throttle levels.

instead of messing with injector and timing trims we could enter something like 15:1 afr for vaccum, 11:1 for boost, 1000 F max egt, 230 F max coolant and oil temps, etc and have the ECU adjust in real time, you get the idea...

am I crazy?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 12:28 AM
  #2  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
People already have, in one form or another. See Autronic, almost all high-end OEM ECUs, and the VEMS genboard.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #3  
Bad2ndgen's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Richland Wa.
Some ecu's do have the ability to auto tune the fuel maps, such as the Autronic units... The problem with auto tuning timing is that every engine needs a differant amount of timing based on a multitude of variables. The main reason we can't do this is due to the engine sensors that are used in most systems are not able to tell the ecu what is accually happening inside the cumbustion chamber, like where in relation to TDC peak cylinder pressure is taking place. The sensors are simply telling what is happening before and after the cumbustion chamber, this is not accurate enough to tune timing from. The most common ways to figure where your timing is at is to use a dyno to measure torque from the engine, or reading plugs... There are some new sensors coming out these days that are able to read cylinder pressures and even cooler is one that reads the ION field inside the cumbustion chamber. These sensors are revolutionizing the way engines can be tuned and it is rumered that the Autronic SM5 will be able to auto tune timing using these technoligies...

Regards
Justin
www.alienauto.com
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 03:17 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
EGT probes are relatively slow reacting and go bad.
Wide-band sensors go bad.
Knock sensors are too noisy and cannot reliably isolate the knock frequency reliabily.

Yep, Bad2ndgen is right.
Big pressure transducers are right around the corner.
These will allow to monitor combustion pressures.
This will basically make piezo-based knock sensors obselete.
The problem with this type of sensor is that it's currently very expensive and very unreliable.
I've seen 200bar pressure transducers priced over $1,000 each!
That's ~3,000psi capable!

The hardware is currently fast enough to adjust, but the sensors are not reliable enough to do this with any consistency.


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:48 AM
  #5  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 261
From: Around
yeah but we currently use wb and egt to manually map the systems, and most newer cars automatically advance and retard timing depending on conditions...

maybe have a self tuning unit that locks in tuning maps? Something like the powerfc, we measure and adjust then save the map right? I don't see why this couldn't be done more automatically.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:08 AM
  #6  
FB II's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
From: wishing i was back in FL
get the new E-manage. lol, i wouldnt trust it tho.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #7  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by RETed
Big pressure transducers are right around the corner.
Why bother? Ion sensing can be used with current technology plugs and ignition systems with no engine modifications. I bet it'll be less than 5 years before you can get a CDI system with ion sensing for < $5k.

Originally Posted by Bad2ndgen
The most common ways to figure where your timing is at is to use a dyno to measure torque from the engine, or reading plugs...
You could always give the ECU load-cell output from an engine dyno, in real-time. You'd get a round-about BMEP figure that you could use with EGTs to automate timing setup.

Last edited by a7r; Aug 11, 2005 at 01:33 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 03:03 AM
  #8  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
yeah but we currently use wb and egt to manually map the systems, and most newer cars automatically advance and retard timing depending on conditions...

maybe have a self tuning unit that locks in tuning maps? Something like the powerfc, we measure and adjust then save the map right? I don't see why this couldn't be done more automatically.
I think it's due to liability.
If you're doing adjustments based solely on a sensor and that sensor suddenly fails and kills your engine, who's to fault?


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2012 | 08:57 PM
  #9  
maREX7's Avatar
Rotary Maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
revival of the thread... is there anything reliable out for this matter? regardless of cost
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2012 | 12:39 AM
  #10  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
The new AEM Infinity line certainly sounds interesting and has fast enough processing to do real time corrections.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2012 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
maREX7's Avatar
Rotary Maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
very interesting, willing to throw some money towards something like that if its promising anything impressive
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Originally Posted by maREX7
very interesting, willing to throw some money towards something like that if its promising anything impressive
Check out the thread on the AEM forum for more information.

http://forum.aempower.com/forum/index.php?topic=28808.0

Right now it's Vaporware, and I have doubts that they will release anything RX specific. Maybe a universal one will be released at some point or you could try and adapt one for another model.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #13  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Until the day someone can program a human ear and common sense into a 1/4 pound black box that costs less than $1k USD to build a good tuner is going to be invaluable

I work in electronics research and development, auto tune is a farce at the moment.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Jun 26, 2016 10:21 AM
armans
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Aug 15, 2015 09:08 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.