Canadian Forum Canadian users, post event and club info here.

the 15yr rule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-07, 02:52 AM
  #76  
Full Member
 
paradoxbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver/Yokohama
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole idea of the 15 year rule is to save Canadian and American jobs. The 15 year import rule remains in place because if it were lifted to 10 years or 5 years, the CAW would have a psychotic episode of rage.

It has nothing to do with safety.

A 1997 Stagea meets ALL Canadian safety specifications with minimal modifications with exception of front bumper specs, which frankly are stupid regulations in Canada that wind up doing more harm in insurance or out of pocket repair costs than injury prevention in <5kph crashes.
Old 07-15-07, 03:46 AM
  #77  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Shadao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and even then using the Auto workers as an excuse doesnt work either, after all they have been laying off more and more workers.... why? because domestic vehicles made here suck, and the vehicles made abroad are nicer and safer, after all japan is leading the world in auto sales.... i guess all there vehicles are unsafe
Old 07-15-07, 04:01 AM
  #78  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shadao
if safety was the arguement then they would be pulling unsafe vehicles off the roads that are domestics... at an CCMTA meeting outside was a bunch of imported vehicles, the link is now dead to the pics but there was a domestic 4runner and its jdm equivelant the surf, the surf didnt have a spot of rust on it the interior was mint and looked brand new, the domestic was rusted out windshield had a crack and the interior looked like it was taken out of a garbage dump...
This is valid, but you can also find a POS JDM, and you can also find a prestine USDM if you looked hard enough. I dont deny the quality of most imports, just some.


Originally Posted by Shadao
changing the laws to 25yrs would not bring in more control to the inspections.... that statement is backwards...

please tell me how it would improve the inspection process?
It would filter out the cars that are simply not eligable. I dont want to see the rule change, but in the government's eyes, it works. 'If the dam overspills, build a bigger dam.'

Originally Posted by Shadao
keeping the 15yr rule in place and properly inspecting the vehicles is what needs to be done.... the break down is at the inspection process.... when a person has to get an inspection performed regardless of if its an domestic or import the inspection facility should do there job, which they arent.... because domestics are passed all the time falling apart, the only vehicles they truly check now are imports thus prooving that they are safer because they are being inspected properly....

the rules are being enforced thats why you can only legally import vehicles 15yrs or older, its the inspections that need to be done properly, and chanign the eligblity age wont change that...

the only benefit to changing the rule to 25yrs is they will be able to identify vehicles that are not eligible that much easier, no more R33's and R34's or RX7's and Supras that arent 15yrs old....
I fully agree on the above, as I've stated before. Before, on the rule change subject, I was simply reflecting an obvious government course of action to change the year to 25. I dont want to see it change, I just want to see what we have properly enforced.

Originally Posted by Shadao
it wont improve safety on our roads, because if the change happens, people who were gonna buy a quality used vehjicle from japan now are stuck with garbage domestics....

so you still back the safety arguement? youd rather people who dont have alot of money to begin with spend it on an over priced rusted out high km domestic vehicle.... think clearly please it will help us all.....

trying to say that a import is less safe than a domestic without PROOF is BS, you know it, i know it... and when comparing the jdm to the usdm use apples to apples and not oranges...
They arn't just targeting imports anymore, they are targetting domestics as well. I often see TC roadside inspection sites where they do a quick once over on your car. ALOT of them fail. Logically, with the booming $$, increased salaries, and many workplace positions availiable - Many more people can afford new, or like new vehicles. Pleasently, I see less and less crap crowding the roads.
Old 07-15-07, 04:12 AM
  #79  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paradoxbox
The whole idea of the 15 year rule is to save Canadian and American jobs. The 15 year import rule remains in place because if it were lifted to 10 years or 5 years, the CAW would have a psychotic episode of rage.
The job arguement is weak. Simply because there are say....15 million drivers in canada. How many imports are there in canada right now? Did you know Alberta is the truck sales capital of North America? Did you know Ford sells a car every minute? 90% of the people out there dont even know what an RX-7 is.

Originally Posted by paradoxbox
It has nothing to do with safety.

A 1997 Stagea meets ALL Canadian safety specifications with minimal modifications with exception of front bumper specs, which frankly are stupid regulations in Canada that wind up doing more harm in insurance or out of pocket repair costs than injury prevention in <5kph crashes.
This has everything to do about safety. Im sure a 97 Stagea is safe, and probably compliant to canadian standards of 1997. But we are still a left hand drive country, and Japan, a right hand drive country.

If this were not true, I could order a RHD car from the factory. I agree our regulations suck. But look at the US, they suck even harder. We got it good compared to them. Their system has MANY loopholes. Ours does if you get to the inspection phase or have a dealer plate.



I think this discussion is pretty well drawing to a close. Its not like we can do anything about the rule change but sit back and see what happens. It doesnt matter whos right and whos wrong, because the government is always right.

Personally, if you jump through the government hoops, Im all for a 0 year rule.
Old 07-15-07, 09:02 AM
  #80  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
you can order an RHD car from the factory, and there are tons of them on the road.

Go to a subaru dealer and say, I want an RHD impreza/legacy/whatever. They'll have to order it, but they will.

if the RHD thing was an issue, then they'd say that in the laws.

Would a 1997 skoda LHD not be up to our standards?
or the hundreds of LHD bmw's and audis that never made it to our market?

The bumper law doesn't really apply to someone personally importing a car, they know the risks when they purchase it.
Old 07-15-07, 11:58 AM
  #81  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Shadao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what i fail to understand is why, if you are all for our current laws, would you play devils advocate and sympathize with the gov't...

they wanted to change the laws but because of us they didnt get to do it without going unnoticed, now they have to perform studies and unless the studies proove that these vehicles are unsafe for our roads, if they dont proove they are unsafe as a whole.... all imported vehicles, LHD, RHD, from the UK or Japan, they wont be able to change the laws...

and as for them targetting other vehicles than just imported ones.... why is it i still see rusted out junkers that have coat hangers holding the muffler up, bungie cords holding the bumper up, with a baby seat in the back...

sure there are POS japanese vehicles, but they are very few when it comes to ones that have been imported, however there are alot more domestic piles of crap than japanese ones, after all they have the shaken inspection process which keeps those junk vehicles off the roads, what do we have???

as for being able to afford new vehicles.... i know of a bunch of friends who have gone off and bought brand new cars, and they cant afford them but they bought it anyways because they needed something reliable, so now they are in debt, like most canadians when it comes to purchasing a new vehicle.... putting our country into personal debt isnt a good thing....

you say that if you look hard enough you can find what you are looking for here... well if i do a quick comparison of here VS there. i quickly notice that the vehicles here cost 2x as much as there for the same quality of vehicle...

here rx7's FD go for around 15-25k there they are sold for 5-15k BIG difference

here MarkVI supras go for 60k there they go for 10-20k even bigger difference...

here landcruisers go for 15k(and they are falling apart and dont have the turbo diesil option) there they go for 5-10k not such a bigg difference in price but you can get them with the diesil which saves money on fuel....

and those are jsut a couple options... the people who buy a imported vehicle buy it becuase you cant get a domestic of the same quality, for the same price...
Old 07-15-07, 02:26 PM
  #82  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terrh
you can order an RHD car from the factory, and there are tons of them on the road.

Go to a subaru dealer and say, I want an RHD impreza/legacy/whatever. They'll have to order it, but they will.

if the RHD thing was an issue, then they'd say that in the laws.

Would a 1997 skoda LHD not be up to our standards?
or the hundreds of LHD bmw's and audis that never made it to our market?

The bumper law doesn't really apply to someone personally importing a car, they know the risks when they purchase it.
So I guess I can plate it and put it on the street then? I'll have to do it I guess, since no one else will try.

As for the other LHD vehicles, I guess we should buy 8, and crash test them. Once they pass, or fail, we will know for sure how they stack up.

Or just buy one 15 years old, get an inspection for a case of beer and drive it. We'll know how safe it is if it ever gets in a collision.
Old 07-15-07, 02:35 PM
  #83  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shadao
what i fail to understand is why, if you are all for our current laws, would you play devils advocate and sympathize with the gov't...

they wanted to change the laws but because of us they didnt get to do it without going unnoticed, now they have to perform studies and unless the studies proove that these vehicles are unsafe for our roads, if they dont proove they are unsafe as a whole.... all imported vehicles, LHD, RHD, from the UK or Japan, they wont be able to change the laws...

and as for them targetting other vehicles than just imported ones.... why is it i still see rusted out junkers that have coat hangers holding the muffler up, bungie cords holding the bumper up, with a baby seat in the back...

sure there are POS japanese vehicles, but they are very few when it comes to ones that have been imported, however there are alot more domestic piles of crap than japanese ones, after all they have the shaken inspection process which keeps those junk vehicles off the roads, what do we have???

as for being able to afford new vehicles.... i know of a bunch of friends who have gone off and bought brand new cars, and they cant afford them but they bought it anyways because they needed something reliable, so now they are in debt, like most canadians when it comes to purchasing a new vehicle.... putting our country into personal debt isnt a good thing....

you say that if you look hard enough you can find what you are looking for here... well if i do a quick comparison of here VS there. i quickly notice that the vehicles here cost 2x as much as there for the same quality of vehicle...

here rx7's FD go for around 15-25k there they are sold for 5-15k BIG difference

here MarkVI supras go for 60k there they go for 10-20k even bigger difference...

here landcruisers go for 15k(and they are falling apart and dont have the turbo diesil option) there they go for 5-10k not such a bigg difference in price but you can get them with the diesil which saves money on fuel....

and those are jsut a couple options... the people who buy a imported vehicle buy it becuase you cant get a domestic of the same quality, for the same price...
Im not playing devils advocate. When this thread started, I picked the other side so readers could realize WHY exactly the government wanted to force a changed. There is no action in this country for no reason. I was just making a point from another point of view. 90% of the people in this country have no idea whats going on half the time.

I bought a skyline because it was never made here. That was my sole reason. Much like buying a 4runner with a Diesel.

But honestly, I cant think of anyone with the exception of me, and another fellow that have accually paid cash for their cars. I know about 10 guys that struggled to get financing to buy whatever it is they drive. I imagine 75% of the people out there HAVE paid cash for their cars. But the fact of the matter is, its much easier to finance a new car, than it is an old car. Everyone knows that.

New reliable car, or older car you have GREAT difficulty finding parts for.

Keep in mind the market is much different on cars. Here you dont have to pay a small fourtune for no reason to drive your older car. Also, we have a tiny bit more space to park our cars than in Japan. So what do you do with your old car? Well, since nobody wants it, sell it for peanuts.

Here on the other hand, I donno about you, but in my few years in calgary, I've only ever accually seen about 5 seperate Supra's on the road. I see them everywhere when I travel to the lower 48's. Fact of the matter is, the car is worth what its worth. You cant find one, you pay alot. when you can find a million you pay a little.

The only positive effect I've seen, is that when the JDM FD's started flooding the market, when I was looking for a LHD one, it accually went up in price, instead of down. Reason for not getting a JDM is simply because I cant fit in it comfortable like a domestic FD.
Old 07-15-07, 05:31 PM
  #84  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Shadao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow you just made yourself look like a total fool...

you cant fit into a JDM FD and thats why you got a USDM FD.... your dumb so very very dumb.... no wonder you sided with the gov't you prolly workl for them...

im done trying to explain how good these vehicles are because like some people in this world you have made your mind up and instead of being skeptical you are cynical you should sell your FD and any other quality vehicle you own and buy a GM you dont deserve to own something thats quality... after all you will fit better in a GM anyways

i used the supras as amn example as soon as they are eligible for importation those 60k supras arent gonna be worht that anymore...
Old 07-15-07, 07:53 PM
  #85  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (9)
 
Alak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,040
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shadao
wow you just made yourself look like a total fool...

you cant fit into a JDM FD and thats why you got a USDM FD.... your dumb so very very dumb.... no wonder you sided with the gov't you prolly workl for them...
You just proved you cant read. What grade are you in? 9? I said I couldn't fit comfortably, not that I couldn't fit. I can get in the car, drive and operate it like any other human. I just cant for an extended period of time. God did make all of us under 6 feet tall.

Originally Posted by Shadao

im done trying to explain how good these vehicles are because like some people in this world you have made your mind up and instead of being skeptical you are cynical you should sell your FD and any other quality vehicle you own and buy a GM you dont deserve to own something thats quality... after all you will fit better in a GM anyways
You make JDM's sound like the end all of cars. You make them sound like they are better at any age than any vehicle you can ever find here. You make them to be no comparison, and that if said rule changed, you'd cry yourself to death because you'd have no motor vehicles to praise anymore.

Grow up man. Im sure in a year, you'll be interested in some other car like a Citreon 2CV or something - and you'll be back here to defend how awesome a car that is.

Originally Posted by Shadao
i used the supras as amn example as soon as they are eligible for importation those 60k supras arent gonna be worht that anymore...
They said the same thing about FD's. And guess what? Nothing has changed! A domestic FD is still worth $25,000 in great condition because, simply, thats what its worth.


Im pretty well done with this discussion, simply because everything that can be said, has been said. Only reason Im still going, its the courtesy of a response.
Old 12-30-07, 12:47 PM
  #86  
Junior Member
 
604Rex7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alak
You just proved you cant read. What grade are you in? 9? I said I couldn't fit comfortably, not that I couldn't fit. I can get in the car, drive and operate it like any other human. I just cant for an extended period of time. God did make all of us under 6 feet tall.



You make JDM's sound like the end all of cars. You make them sound like they are better at any age than any vehicle you can ever find here. You make them to be no comparison, and that if said rule changed, you'd cry yourself to death because you'd have no motor vehicles to praise anymore.

Grow up man. Im sure in a year, you'll be interested in some other car like a Citreon 2CV or something - and you'll be back here to defend how awesome a car that is.



They said the same thing about FD's. And guess what? Nothing has changed! A domestic FD is still worth $25,000 in great condition because, simply, thats what its worth.


Im pretty well done with this discussion, simply because everything that can be said, has been said. Only reason Im still going, its the courtesy of a response.
damn old thread but wanted to say...lhd is also more desriable over rhd so domestic cars will continue to sell at w/e its worth compare to the rhd. Besides who really wants a rhd when its a lhd country??? besides being a cheap *** no offense to anyone but seriously only people ive seen buy jdm car are usually the younger guys who cant afford to buy the lhd ones.
Old 12-30-07, 01:47 PM
  #87  
1.3L piston eater

 
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i work for a company that sells them... i prefer RHD over left ! + you dont see very many left hand drive 1985 Fcs around vancouver
Old 01-08-08, 01:37 PM
  #88  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Shadao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive seen more older guys in RHD vehicles than younger guys... however i have also seen more younger guys in sporty cars than older guys... but if you look at the numbers of the imported vehicles you will see that there are more SUV's and DD cars than sports cars coming over...

also do you know of any LHD skylines? or low km fd's or Fc's? i dont... the price and mileage is what makes these cars and suv's desireable...

for 10-15k you can get a VERY nice FC or decent FD from japan, but for 10-15k you might be able to get a honda
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kutukutu1
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
167
12-01-21 09:01 PM
zyph3r
Canadian Forum
10
09-16-18 07:14 PM



Quick Reply: the 15yr rule



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.