3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

WOW, Non sequential is absultely amazing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 10:19 PM
  #1  
ejmack1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lawn Ornament
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 2
From: St Louis, USA
WOW, Non sequential is absultely amazing

I converted after 9 months of sequential problems, now i am at full boost all the way till redline, the only problem is the damn boost creep up to 14-15 psi, that sucks, i cant really get on it, but the way it is now it seems 10 times better than ever before... Does anyone know what stuff i can get rid of now? Vac hose wise?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 12:29 AM
  #2  
7-sins's Avatar
thats not paint....
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 2
From: Manassas, VA
Sweet man, :1party: I just converted too because of sequential problems. I havent driven it yet though. Did you do the "poor-man" conversion. If so what all did you do....

-I pulled off the TCA - plugged lines
-Wired the door open
-Pulled off Charge Control lines - plugged
-Pulled off Turbo Pre-control lines - plugged
-Pulled off Charge Relief vacuum line - plugged
-Switched the Wastegate solenoid line to the Turbo Pre-Control solenoid (For boost control with the Power FC)

I just wanted to make sure I did not do anything wrong.

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 03:28 AM
  #3  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
will switching over to non-seq. effect the 1/4 mile time
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 07:27 AM
  #4  
jackc's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: canada
I am running squential...and just got my motor rebuilt w/street port. But when the vaccum lines were put in... I am not 100%
sure they were put back correctly.

The car seems to have decent HP but I still think I might be missing about 40 HP.

I too was wondering about 1/4 mile times with non-squential?

Thanks for the replies.... jc.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 09:07 AM
  #5  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
I ran 11.74 on non-sequential, so no it won't effect your 1/4 mile times, negitively anyway. Anthony from T&R went 11.1 non-sequential!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 10:16 AM
  #6  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
Originally posted by ErnieT
I ran 11.74 on non-sequential, so ...
And I know someone that runs 11.7 sequential. He went non-sequential, and now he wants to go back. He likes the low end power.

I think it's just a matter of preference. It's just a matter of if you want to deal with the sequential system or not to keep low end power. You go non and you gain top end. You stay seq and you get to have low end.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 10:34 AM
  #7  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
I realize it can be done sequential, but he asked if going non-sequential had any effects in the 1/4. Also, if you can get by without having the lowend, the other positives, IMO, outweigh the negitives going non-sequential. The one main reason for myself doing it was the elimination of the selanoid rack and vacume lines.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 11:25 AM
  #8  
Silver7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally posted by Flybye

And I know someone that runs 11.7 sequential.
[cough cough] get it right man.... 11.6 @118
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
Silver7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally posted by Flybye
You go non and you gain top end. You stay seq and you get to have low end.
I don't neccessarily agree with this statement but I don't feel like arguing.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 12:08 PM
  #10  
Johnny's Avatar
OG
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 1
From: Pleasanton,California
There is no doubt you lose a little low end going non-seq...if you dont notice you need to turn up the sensitivity on your butt-dyno. There is nothing like driving a properly working seq.system..the car is a absolute joy..
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
Project RX-7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Canada
newbie question......what is boost creep?

thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 04:05 PM
  #12  
JoeD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by Project RX-7
newbie question......what is boost creep?

thanks.
boost creeping higher and higher becasue of the wastegate not being able to vent enough exhaust.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 04:46 PM
  #13  
Silver7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally posted by Johnny
There is no doubt you lose a little low end going non-seq...
I agree. I don't think there is any top end to be gained by going to nonseq. In theory if you gut the turbo manifold then you will pick up some air flow. I don't think it would be very noticeable on a dyno. The advantage nonseq has is in the midrange from about 4000 to 4500 rpms. The biggest differnce I noticed is much smoother accelleration pulling out of turns on a race track. For the street I think seq is the way to go. Of course this is just my personal opinion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
zyph3r
Canadian Forum
10
Sep 16, 2018 07:14 PM
Jmpabon93
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 30, 2015 04:57 PM
choddaboy
Introduce yourself
0
Sep 26, 2015 06:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.