3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What will constitute a "Stock" FD in the future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-08, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
What will constitute a "Stock" FD in the future

What will constitute a "Stock" FD in future collector markets? Pure and simple must it be a 100% restoration of an 93, 94, or 95 with year specific replacement parts ? Will some upgrades hold the value or plummet the value of the FD

- If upgrades are only pure Mazdaspeed FD products?
- If upgrades include improved later version JDM FD parts?
- If upgrades above are combined with high end FD tuners?
- Limits to upgrades? Reliability mod’s only,?; improved cooling w/ MSpeed, Koyo, Fluidyne rad’s.? as with IC MS, Japan tuner?
- ECU upgrades?
- Turbo upgrade to ’99 JDM?, BNR?
- BBK kits; MS, JDM RZ, other?
- ’99 JDM body clone with JDM parts?
- Spirit R clone is it all or nothing (RHD only?)



Old 10-09-08, 06:04 PM
  #2  
Dreams come true

iTrader: (2)
 
PowerStripe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oceanside, SoCal
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
interesting. i think all reliability mods should still be considered a stock car. even though some of those like the dp are also performance mods. by the time these cars r collectible they will all be far too old to have survived that long by being completely stock. unless of course they were never driven. but even then lots of parts would have deteriorated by then.
Old 10-09-08, 06:11 PM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
In my mind, I would only consider it collectably "stock" if it's got only Mazda parts from that model year. That would be in the purest sense of a collectible mint condition car, and I would expect it to be most coveted.

However, I personally would also see mazdaspeed parts and updated Mazda parts as acceptable for a low mileage car. In my mind that's 90% as collectible as the virgin stock car.

Keep in mind my vote is of little value because I don't have money for buying another FD.

Dave
Old 10-09-08, 06:14 PM
  #4  
fd0
formerly chillin_rx7_guy

iTrader: (8)
 
fd0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buy aftermarket parts for now but keep your original stock parts. Even if you're not buying it as a collector, you should keep it around just in case buyer's don't want a modified car or doesn't like your taste of choices.
Old 10-09-08, 06:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
pauli311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who is to say for sure..

I believe reliability mods would help constitute stock but it really depends on if you are saying Barret-Jackson stock or realistically stock. We all know what leaving these things stock can do but it really depends on who you are and what it means to you.

99spec on a 93-95 would not be true stock but it would be a tasteful mod in most peoples' opinions.

Keeping it twin turbo with rats nest might be the kicker. A stock mount intercooler should be alright, too.
Old 10-09-08, 06:33 PM
  #6  
94 Single Turbo FD

 
Smitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think stock is stock, meaning stock ast, stock rad, stock everything, if modifications have been made it would then follow under the category of custom. Custom cars are also sold on Barrett-Jackson. The original paint job is also a definite assest when it comes to being all original or stock.

i think even original tires are also considered an asset when selling a collectible automobile. of course the mileage would have to be next to zero for this to happen.

any wear components having to be replaced on the vehicle such as brakes,suspension, or a crispy rats nest would show signs of the cars mileage and price would be reflected accordingly

Last edited by Smitter; 10-09-08 at 06:52 PM.
Old 10-09-08, 09:34 PM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I agree with the geese. Thats why Im keeping all my stock parts but Im beginning to think there are to many miles on my car to be valuable. I have 61k on the chassis and 35k on the engine. If I were going to spend big money on a 7, I would look for a low mile virgin 7 even if it did have rotten hoses.
Old 10-09-08, 10:30 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
This is not really imperative, depending on many other things, but certainly, there are those who would say that the most collectible version of the Rx7 will be one with all numbers matching and stock FD Mazda everything will be the museum quality, ultimately highest value collectibles.

However, when I have shown older cars, like MG's or Alfa's, the concours judges have no issues with "period correct" accessories, like racing parts that were available for the car at the time it was made. This certainly extends to all kinds of engine and drivetrain mods that are done right. However, and especially given the nature of what some do to these cars (FD's), I think going overboard will hurt the collectibility to some degree.

I think cars with reliability mods primarily will be treated almost the same as pure numbers matching cars.

Gordon
The Japanese for all their quality control not only didn't seem interested in matching serial no.s/VIN numbers of body, engine, transmission but didn't seem to keep records of such assemblies used. At least that is what I have been told by Mazda Motorsport a few times over the years. My being affiliated with a regulated manufacturing concern designing and fabricating offshore oil rigs for the international industry, where we serialize and trace every part and piece of steel, I find this impossible to believe that they don't have production records. Most likely just not releasable.

My experience in the late 70's with a Triumph TR4 and jaguar E-Type was that factory accessories and factory race parts were highly desirable options. Of course the TR's had not started to climb in value until now and the Jag. was a fortune to maintain and in my young career had to dump my "love" of the time. Now almost 30 years later it is Loti my first love in high school and rotary cars.

As I have matured, I look at cars based on what I like and want from them as i select my art, what i see in a gallery that grabs my attention not a desire to accept something I don't reaaly like but it has the name.


Last edited by Julian; 10-09-08 at 10:40 PM.
Old 10-09-08, 10:40 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I really ask this question, because my own car while still in very very good condition has started on a customization trend to fulfill my wants. I keep it pure stock for about 10 years. Today I regret that I did not keep it stock and just pick up a second to modify. I have kept every stock part and they are still in great condition and all mods have been with highest quality parts: MS, JDM, RE A, Apexi, Trust other than suspension where I when for function within class rules but other areas I have done to satisfy myself, interior leather red stitched trim and roll bar, fender lip rolls that have left permanent scars on the "stockness".
Old 10-09-08, 10:46 PM
  #10  
Full Member
 
JMaxx08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: south
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julian
[FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black][SIZE=3]What will constitute a "Stock" FD in future collector markets? Pure and simple must it be a 100% restoration of an 93, 94, or 95 with year specific replacement parts ? Will some upgrades hold the value or plummet the value of the FD
If you follow what is accepted for most other makes and models what they're after is the way the car came out of the factory. No deviations. Some get so **** they recreate all the factory stickers, paint marks, even the overspray!

If you have fanatasies of being on the lawn at Pebble Beach in 2050 you're gonna regret throwing away that bulky factory airbox (or cutting holes in the bottom of it.)
Old 10-10-08, 12:47 AM
  #11  
Turd Ferguson

iTrader: (1)
 
grimple1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, California
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i think stock is any of these that will still be running in 10 years. lets face it. it's a little like rearranging deck chairs on the titanic
Old 10-10-08, 12:51 AM
  #12  
Full Member
 
JMaxx08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: south
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^lol^
Old 10-10-08, 12:54 AM
  #13  
恶*魔*七*

iTrader: (3)
 
Drifter288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no define stock, since we replace the ast since the stock one blows up, then there are those crummy vacuum lines that get brittle. I believe reliability mods are just "stock" parts but updated originals.
Old 10-10-08, 12:33 PM
  #14  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,835
Received 2,604 Likes on 1,847 Posts
i think its pretty context dependant.

if you want a barret jackson type car, then really mild mods like a radiator, cat back and nice wheels probably are good

if you're pebble beach concourse. the car has to be 100% factory. you'd get points deducted for not using the mazda vacuum line (it is available, and it is marked), and ngk plug wires (the factory used yazaki, again its available). we have the documentation, it would be really easy to do.

the difference is that the concours car probably wouldnt get driven, as it has to pass the white glove test, everywhere (and they do).

the barret jackson type car is probably something you drive to work on fridays.

Last edited by j9fd3s; 10-10-08 at 12:36 PM.
Old 10-10-08, 01:02 PM
  #15  
Searching for 10th's

iTrader: (11)
 
jkstill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 2,247
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
For a lot of us it is probably moot.

Too much time, money, blood, sweat and tears in the car to ever get rid of it.

If I sold it, I would just have to get something else, that would cost time, money...

Or get another FD

Besides, it's just too much fun to drive.
Old 10-10-08, 02:17 PM
  #16  
Recovering Miataholic

 
wstrohm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 1,533
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
IMHO our (orig. owner) '94 is pretty close to stock... vacuum hoses changed to Viton, Dale Clark's check valves replaced originals, Bonez DP replaced pre-cat, and that's it. Everything else is OEM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
11-10-23 11:08 AM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
10-07-15 04:04 PM
Redliner223
South RX-7 Forum
0
09-23-15 05:12 PM
RedBaronII
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-20-15 11:29 AM
fd3CB
SevenStock Archive
0
09-11-15 11:12 AM



Quick Reply: What will constitute a "Stock" FD in the future



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.