3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What the highest compression possible

Old Sep 19, 2004 | 04:00 AM
  #1  
FdWannaBePt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: so call
What the highest compression possible

so i went to check out an fd today i gues the dealership is having it check out since they got it at an auction the interior and outside look pretty good a few dings and the interior smell i dunno old i guess. so i asked the mechanic what did the compression test come out too he said 175% and this is on a stock fd i dunno the mileage though it said mileage exempt on the ad cuz they dont know the true mileage. when i heard that sounded like bs wat do u guys think? im gonna test drive it on weds possibly the mechanic should be done checking it out.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 04:34 AM
  #2  
scratchjunkie's Avatar
sexy no jutsu
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
From: planet arium
175% does not compute
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 04:39 AM
  #3  
HeffBoost's Avatar
Keep Right Except to Pass
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
What does 175% mean? Was that inches of mercury or something?

At sea level 9:1 is ~132 psi. That would be optimal.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 05:00 AM
  #4  
FdWannaBePt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: so call
well im pretty much at sea level so does this probably mean this guy doesn't know what he's talking about?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 05:00 AM
  #5  
FdWannaBePt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: so call
oh he juss said 175% so isn't that pretty high for anything?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #6  
dexmex88's Avatar
My FD Sucks
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by FdWannaBePt2
oh he juss said 175% so isn't that pretty high for anything?
175%, what the hell is that?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #7  
cloud9's Avatar
The bomb is in the toy!1!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 291
From: Dallas Tx.
I think his *** is what is doing the talking
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 01:49 PM
  #8  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by FdWannaBePt2
well im pretty much at sea level so does this probably mean this guy doesn't know what he's talking about?
If he said the compression was 175%, then yes he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #9  
krm197's Avatar
This is how I save gas
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
I think I'm going to have a stroke trying to figure out what he meant
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #10  
BLKTOPTRVL's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 16
From: South Carolina
Call them back and ask what they meant.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 09:23 PM
  #11  
HeffBoost's Avatar
Keep Right Except to Pass
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by scratchjunkie
175% does not compute
LOL This says it all.

A percentage would make sense if it was less than 100.

So with his #s I get 231 psi.

If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #12  
FdWannaBePt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: so call
well what the measure meant of the compression percentage cuz i thought it was a percentage but people talk about over 100% and i dont know how you can have over 100% compression
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
scratchjunkie's Avatar
sexy no jutsu
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
From: planet arium
i hope you didnt pay for that compression test
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 12:35 PM
  #14  
FdWannaBePt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: so call
haha no it was a mechanic that i guess the dealer is in cahoots with
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 01:20 PM
  #15  
broken93's Avatar
apex seal BBQ
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 867
Likes: 1
From: AL
Originally Posted by cloud9
I think his *** is what is doing the talking
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 01:43 AM
  #16  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Is this car at a Mazda dealership? If so that explain alot of things. LOL
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #17  
generalchaos's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
what would be the lowest compression acceptable? when I check out this one fd im getting a compression test done on it if I like it before I buy it, and wondering what the lowest acceptable test rating would be on the engine.

sorry if im jacking the thread, something you might want to know as well though.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
11 is the highest possible. It used to be 10, but then Mazda started making them go to 11.

-Max
enjoying the unitless measurement humor
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #19  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by maxcooper
11 is the highest possible. It used to be 10, but then Mazda started making them go to 11.

-Max
enjoying the unitless measurement humor
But couldn't you just make 10 better and then call that 10? Yeah, but ours go to 11!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #20  
jeff48's Avatar
Rotorally Challenged
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
6.5 Kgf/cm2= about 92 psi (low limit for decent performance)
7.0 Kgf/cm2= about 100 psi (book spec)
8.5 Kgf/cm2= about 120 psi (really nice numbers)
9.0 Kgf/cm2= about 128 psi (killer #s)

175% of book spec would be
12.25 Kgf/cm2=175 psi


Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 02:34 PM
  #21  
jeff48's Avatar
Rotorally Challenged
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Originally Posted by maxcooper
-Max
enjoying the unitless measurement humor

There he goes again folks. Always giving 110% to the forum!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
Nov 10, 2023 11:08 AM
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Aug 6, 2017 01:41 PM
MidnightOwl
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Sep 25, 2015 10:24 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.