3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What the BOOST?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #1  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
What the BOOST?!

Hey everyone, I recently had my FD converted into a non-sequential, but was very dissatisfied with the results. Rather than my turbos spooling around 3500 like I was told, they don't start until about 4500, and it takes about 1/8 of a second for them to spool. Uneducated in FDs, my belief is that perhaps the computer needed to be retuned( I know my stock rear turbo kicked in at 4500 before), and maybe thats why it won't spool, because I am getting 0psi at 4300 and 11psi at 4500. PLEASE HELP if you have ANY info, this low end loss is killing me!!!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #2  
wutanec's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
You need midpipe to free up the flow to reduce the lag. Which requires upgraded ecu.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:18 AM
  #3  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
The part I'm confused about is how the boost kicks in instantly, as if all of a sudden the computer told the car to let the turbos start now(if thats how its works, like I said, uneducated). I realize my lag is due to lack of exhaust flow, but I'd really like to know why the power is so sudden.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #4  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Basically this is how sequential works:
(1) from 0 to about 4000 rpm, the #1 turbo gets all of the exhaust so it spools instantly.
(2) around 4000 rpm the #2 turbo get s little exhaust to prespool.
(3) around 4500 rpm both turbo share all the exhaust for full power.

I complete well done non-seq conversion with a DP and MP would impress you unless you have an automatic transmission mentallity which many on this forum have.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #5  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
I have a non-sequential, I just don't know if its "well done"
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
you have something wrong...as NS should not spool instantly and you should have boost below 4500. NS is a very linear curve.

who did the conversion?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #7  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
T&R Racing, in Queens, NY. www.RX7s.com like I said I'm VERY disappointed with this setup
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #8  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
My goal was to sacrifice the unneccesary low-end power for mid power, and all it seems like I did was remove the smaller turbo
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
When you do a non-seq conversion, part of it should be:
(1) port the wastegate.
(2) remove the turbo control actuator, it's exhaust control valve in the exhaust manifold, plug the gates control arm hole in the exhaust manifold, and round off the edges of the #2 rotor exhaust port in the turbo housing.
(3) weld the pre-control gate open.
(4) and a few other removeal of parts.

This all requires removing the turbo assemble and the exhaust manifold, and taking the turbos apart.

If this was not done, then you have a poor mans non-seq which is not a non-seq conversion in my book.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
interesting...they didn't say they did any of this...damn I must have a poor mans NS, but I told them do it correctly, price wasn't an issue on qualtiy of work, I just wanted it done right...I'll be making a call later, thanks so much for the info...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
High_Carb_Diet
Power FC Forum
1
Sep 5, 2015 09:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.