Trying to make the ultimate Non Sequential Diagram!
Re: Re: Re: Trying to make the ultimate Non Sequential Diagram!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by fc1jz
It looks like the line going to the boost controler is attached to the intake in the diagram, but it is not. It must sense boost from somewhere. You do not need the solenoids for the actuator to work, just a vaccum line to the UIM or turbo xover or something. Just needs to sense boost so it can open.
It looks like the line going to the boost controler is attached to the intake in the diagram, but it is not. It must sense boost from somewhere. You do not need the solenoids for the actuator to work, just a vaccum line to the UIM or turbo xover or something. Just needs to sense boost so it can open.
dude your freakin awesome!!!! i was jus going to ask everyone for a good diagram to do this! i have been wanting to do it for a little while now!
couple of questions tho:
1.do you take the "rats nest" out?
2. i heard that your suppose to use alot of blockoff plates. if so where do you get them at?
3. what do you use to cap all the nipples
4. are you suppose to have the primary WG capped off? and why?
thanks
couple of questions tho:
1.do you take the "rats nest" out?
2. i heard that your suppose to use alot of blockoff plates. if so where do you get them at?
3. what do you use to cap all the nipples
4. are you suppose to have the primary WG capped off? and why?
thanks
Originally posted by FD3RotorTurbo
dude your freakin awesome!!!! i was jus going to ask everyone for a good diagram to do this! i have been wanting to do it for a little while now!
couple of questions tho:
1.do you take the "rats nest" out?
2. i heard that your suppose to use alot of blockoff plates. if so where do you get them at?
3. what do you use to cap all the nipples
4. are you suppose to have the primary WG capped off? and why?
thanks
dude your freakin awesome!!!! i was jus going to ask everyone for a good diagram to do this! i have been wanting to do it for a little while now!
couple of questions tho:
1.do you take the "rats nest" out?
2. i heard that your suppose to use alot of blockoff plates. if so where do you get them at?
3. what do you use to cap all the nipples
4. are you suppose to have the primary WG capped off? and why?
thanks
2.Block of plates any major RX7 provider, rx7 store etc
3. Regular Caps at the Auto Store or go the extra mile and you could JB Weld them.
4. Not sure =P
Originally posted by Fatman0203
1.Yes rat nest is GONE
2.Block of plates any major RX7 provider, rx7 store etc
3. Regular Caps at the Auto Store or go the extra mile and you could JB Weld them.
4. Not sure =P
1.Yes rat nest is GONE
2.Block of plates any major RX7 provider, rx7 store etc
3. Regular Caps at the Auto Store or go the extra mile and you could JB Weld them.
4. Not sure =P
Originally posted by FD3RotorTurbo
what do the block off plates generally cost? actually what does the whole project come out to costing?
what do the block off plates generally cost? actually what does the whole project come out to costing?
JD,
The air bleed socket for the primaries, you mean?
I've never been able to get a stable answer on this - but last thing I remember Chuck mentioned it having to do with better atomization of fuel - however it was also mentioned that most people didn't notice a difference.
The air bleed socket for the primaries, you mean?
I've never been able to get a stable answer on this - but last thing I remember Chuck mentioned it having to do with better atomization of fuel - however it was also mentioned that most people didn't notice a difference.
looks almost perfect with my setup right now. Just curious. If I plugged the FPR into the UIM rather than the LIM is that gonna be a problem?
BTW nice diagram....you coulda put it out 2 months ago
BTW nice diagram....you coulda put it out 2 months ago
Originally posted by clayne
JD,
The air bleed socket for the primaries, you mean?
I've never been able to get a stable answer on this - but last thing I remember Chuck mentioned it having to do with better atomization of fuel - however it was also mentioned that most people didn't notice a difference.
JD,
The air bleed socket for the primaries, you mean?
I've never been able to get a stable answer on this - but last thing I remember Chuck mentioned it having to do with better atomization of fuel - however it was also mentioned that most people didn't notice a difference.
Why anyone with a working sequential system would want to do this is beyond me
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
"Hi my names mike and ive been a non sequential user for 9 months"
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
"Hi my names mike and ive been a non sequential user for 9 months"
Originally posted by XSTransAm
Why anyone with a working sequential system would want to do this is beyond me
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
Why anyone with a working sequential system would want to do this is beyond me
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
Have you even looked at dyno charts for properly converted non-sequential cars?
http://www.micromanx.com/goble/rx7/p...3/compare.html
I dont see how that is a relevant compairison seeing as how they were done on different days, with different dynos with different cars and "similar" setups. Next time im by my work ill dig up my old seq vs non seq graph that was done on the same day, on the same dyno, with the same car and mods... ill post it and you can make your own decisions.
(noting that this wouldent be definitive because my second turbo wasent kicking more than about 7 psi anyways but until 4500 the difference in power is scary)
(noting that this wouldent be definitive because my second turbo wasent kicking more than about 7 psi anyways but until 4500 the difference in power is scary)
Originally posted by XSTransAm
Why anyone with a working sequential system would want to do this is beyond me
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
"Hi my names mike and ive been a non sequential user for 9 months"
Why anyone with a working sequential system would want to do this is beyond me
Its like saying hell yeah i want to get rid of half my powerband!
"Hi my names mike and ive been a non sequential user for 9 months"
In case you forgot, it takes ENERGY to spool the 2nd turbo. You do it in serial, we do it in parallel.
i m not really sure about the line from FPR ? has it a line over there already ?? or i have to relocate the line from some where to FPR??? And how will it blown the motor ??
thax guys ...... >.<
thax guys ...... >.<
Originally posted by RE13REW
i m not really sure about the line from FPR ? has it a line over there already ?? or i have to relocate the line from some where to FPR??? And how will it blown the motor ??
thax guys ...... >.<
i m not really sure about the line from FPR ? has it a line over there already ?? or i have to relocate the line from some where to FPR??? And how will it blown the motor ??
thax guys ...... >.<
Originally posted by XSTransAm
Next time im by my work ill dig up my old seq vs non seq graph that was done on the same day, on the same dyno, with the same car and mods...
Next time im by my work ill dig up my old seq vs non seq graph that was done on the same day, on the same dyno, with the same car and mods...
If it was done on the same day, then it was either the longest day in history, or you weren't comparing a properly converted non-sequential system.
(noting that this wouldent be definitive because my second turbo wasent kicking more than about 7 psi anyways but until 4500 the difference in power is scary)
Originally posted by XSTransAm
if you want to trade that for that 3500 rpms of boost be my guest.
if you want to trade that for that 3500 rpms of boost be my guest.
Originally posted by jimlab
Even more reason why your results aren't worth anything.
Even more reason why your results aren't worth anything.
I run non sequential and I hate it, (compaired to stock sequential) end of story... anyone who thinks that they will be happier with it, enjoy.


