3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Too much for the stock ecu?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-02, 10:31 PM
  #1  
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad

Thread Starter
 
RXcetera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England/Sesimbra, Portugal
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too much for the stock ecu?

Would you consider an M2 catback, a N-Tech highflow cat AND an HKS downpipe with completely stock intake too much for the stock ecu? If so, which ecu upgrade would you recommend?
Old 08-06-02, 10:35 PM
  #2  
1JZ powered

 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might be able to get away with it, but I don't know
Old 08-06-02, 10:38 PM
  #3  
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad

Thread Starter
 
RXcetera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England/Sesimbra, Portugal
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too ... but I need to know!!! lol
Old 08-06-02, 10:42 PM
  #4  
1JZ powered

 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've let the exhaust more free, but you've also kept the intake side stock level restrictive so It's safe to say that your engine isn't getting any air, but at the same time, how will the exhaust being more free flow affect boost? What's your boost level and what was it when it was stock?
Old 08-06-02, 10:52 PM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Arrow

Check this thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=94169
Old 08-06-02, 10:58 PM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Just limit your boost to 10 psi, you can run virtually any bolt-ons with the stock ecu.
Old 08-07-02, 03:02 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
legendr35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: so. cal.
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's difficult to limit the boost levels @ 10psi if you have every bolt-on. You're going to see spiking and boost creep, and you any spiking/creeping reaches a high level, your motor might blow. However, if you have a reprogrammed ecu, it will compensate with more fuel, even if you do spike/creep. Unless you port the wastegate and get a good boost controller, it would not be a very good idea to mod your car without an a.f. ECU, it's pretty cheap (second hand) plus it is required if you purchase more mods in the future. why not just buy one now?
Old 08-07-02, 07:25 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by legendr35
it's difficult to limit the boost levels @ 10psi if you have every bolt-on. You're going to see spiking and boost creep, and you any spiking/creeping reaches a high level, your motor might blow. However, if you have a reprogrammed ecu, it will compensate with more fuel, even if you do spike/creep. Unless you port the wastegate and get a good boost controller, it would not be a very good idea to mod your car without an a.f. ECU, it's pretty cheap (second hand) plus it is required if you purchase more mods in the future. why not just buy one now?
legendr35,

Why would someone want to use a band-aid fix (upgraded ECU to add more fuel when boost creep occurs) when he could fix the root of the problem (bore the wastegate, or use a cat or another restriction in the exhaust)?

Usually, a highflow cat is enough to prevent boost creep.

Wade
Old 08-07-02, 08:58 AM
  #9  
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad

Thread Starter
 
RXcetera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England/Sesimbra, Portugal
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really? N-Tech claims the cat has "96% of the flow of an open pipe". Damn, currently the car is running the M2 catback and the N-tech cat and I was hoping to get the dp to help control under hood temps. So what's the verdict lol... is this setup with a downpipe too much? Should I be thinking of going back to the stock cat just to be on the safe side?

Last edited by RXcetera; 08-07-02 at 09:06 AM.
Old 08-07-02, 09:19 AM
  #10  
Perpetual Rebuilder

 
shawnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,250
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw a thread somewhere (from capt bill I think) where he measured back pressure on a ntech vs midpipe and it was 7 vs. 3 (dont remember units) but if that is the case then the math would have to make the stock be around 100 and obviously that couldnt be (cause it couldnt be that bad). I think the claim of 96% is typical marketing crap that usually cant be confirmed or denied unless someone goes to all the trouble capt bill did.

Yep here the thread is:

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...+pressure+tech

Not sure this actually help original post but was mainly an answer to the last question.

Shawn
Old 08-07-02, 09:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will be fine. I know you will be fine as far as the stock ECU and fuel are concerned.

The real question is if you will be able to control boost, and I know a lot of people with high flow (N-tech and other brands) cats, and none of them have had boost creep problems, even with higher flowing intakes and ICs. You might have to tweak your pc and wg pills/valves a bit but that is standard stuff. I'd bet money you will be fine.

It still doesn't hurt to do a fuel pressure test and/or a wideband lambda meter test periodically to make sure the fuel system is working properly.

Wade
Old 08-07-02, 10:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
legendr35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: so. cal.
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I basically meant, if you want a less chance of blowing your motor caused by spike/creep, you should get an aftermarket ECU. I also stated its best to get your wastegate ported. The band-aid fix is better than no fix.

Originally posted by Wade


legendr35,

Why would someone want to use a band-aid fix (upgraded ECU to add more fuel when boost creep occurs) when he could fix the root of the problem (bore the wastegate, or use a cat or another restriction in the exhaust)?

Usually, a highflow cat is enough to prevent boost creep.

Wade
Old 08-08-02, 12:19 AM
  #13  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RX7Elmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha, i second the "fish tank" valve. the home depot valve is a good idea to control boost and pre-control.

You still haven't answered what boost pressure you are seeing with your current mods? and please tell me you have a boost gauge!

Danny
Old 08-08-02, 07:11 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by legendr35
I basically meant, if you want a less chance of blowing your motor caused by spike/creep, you should get an aftermarket ECU. I also stated its best to get your wastegate ported. The band-aid fix is better than no fix.
This is true!

Wade
Old 08-08-02, 09:06 AM
  #15  
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad

Thread Starter
 
RXcetera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England/Sesimbra, Portugal
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RX7Elmo
haha, i second the "fish tank" valve. the home depot valve is a good idea to control boost and pre-control.

You still haven't answered what boost pressure you are seeing with your current mods? and please tell me you have a boost gauge!

Danny
I'm actually picking up the car this month, it's not mine yet . Looks like the guy modded the car backwards... he has a catback and highflow cat with no dp and no boost gauge. He also has an APEX-i intake which (thankfully) isn't installed. The rest of the car is bone stock. I'm thinking I should be ok if I get a gauge, the dp and a high performance homedepot boost controler set to 10psi, make sense?

That intake will have to wait until the ecu gets bumped though .
Old 08-08-02, 11:07 AM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RX7Elmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i highly suggest bringing a boost gauge with you to see how the boost characteristics are. I think a boost gauge should be one of the first if not THE first mod to put on the car. Even a stock car can have problems with boost. Basically, if you see 12-13psi spikes when you test drive it, i would stay away....

Danny
Old 08-08-02, 11:46 AM
  #17  
Full Member

 
asianturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah i would get a ecu next cause i got a dp hi flow and cb and my car is spiking to 13 psi, so for now i'm not flooring it till i get my pfc in the car
Old 08-08-02, 12:18 PM
  #18  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran intake, dp, catback with stock ecu and home depot racing valves for over a year with no problems. i kept my boost at or under 11

STEPHEN
Old 08-08-02, 09:47 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 551
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
since we are on the subject...

tomorrow I'm getting back my ECU which is being remapped by M2 at stage 3 levels for stage 2 mods (Brian recommended it for safety)

Am I understanding you correctly in saying that this is only a "band-aid" fix??? I don't want to deal with fine tuning a stand alone aftermarket engine management system.

And, it is my understanding that adding intake/exhaust mods alone will up the boost on the car, by about 1psi each. So, boost controller aside, its pretty damn difficult to limit your boost. DP and CB alone ups you to 12psi, which the stock ECU will not handle efficiently...

am I missing something????
Old 08-08-02, 10:12 PM
  #20  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally posted by xurotaryrocket
since we are on the subject...

tomorrow I'm getting back my ECU which is being remapped by M2 at stage 3 levels for stage 2 mods (Brian recommended it for safety)

Am I understanding you correctly in saying that this is only a "band-aid" fix??? I don't want to deal with fine tuning a stand alone aftermarket engine management system.

And, it is my understanding that adding intake/exhaust mods alone will up the boost on the car, by about 1psi each. So, boost controller aside, its pretty damn difficult to limit your boost. DP and CB alone ups you to 12psi, which the stock ECU will not handle efficiently...

am I missing something????
It's difficult to control boost usually with a midpipe. If you have a cat, even a high-flo cat typically has enough back pressure to avoid boost creep.

Not all cars react the same to mods, so you will just need to see how your car is boosting. I had a dp, high-flo cat, cb and was only boosting at 10 PSI until I upgraded my ECU. However, there have been people that added a dp and began seeing much higher boost levels.
Old 08-08-02, 10:16 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 551
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh well, better safe than sorry i guess... the M2 ecu will be programmed to run at 13 psi.... but there will be plenty of fuel to compensate...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-03-15 12:37 PM



Quick Reply: Too much for the stock ecu?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.