3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Thoughts on K&N Drop in????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-02, 03:10 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
NeedTwins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Stamford, Ct
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts on K&N Drop in????

For now, I want to make a bit more power, lert the car breathe a bit more, but I dont want to get too crazy. i want to do reliability mods before the performance stuff. I also want to get somer fresh paint. But, overall, any opinions on the K&N drop in filters...
Old 05-24-02, 03:40 PM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

 
93 R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have one. I'll sell it to you for $20 plus shipping.

I got an open air intake.
Old 05-24-02, 03:45 PM
  #3  
Yellow Dragon is no more

 
spyfish007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just make your own custom intake with 2 round K&N filters and 3 small breather filters. Easy and cheep in the long run.
Old 05-24-02, 05:14 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
The K&N drop in will let you keep your stock (quiet) airbox, put not perform as well as the cone filters. I bought an extra airbox a while back so I could open up the bottom and build a duct down beside the radiator. It worked great performance wise, but even with the narrow slot I made I could still hear the BOV. I don't need to hear it to know I just let off the gas.

Spyfish's poor man's intake is just fine too, but I always have to disagree with him
Old 05-27-02, 05:17 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
93TTRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southern California-Glendale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all i felt was a bit better throttle response
Old 05-27-02, 05:50 AM
  #6  
I'm a CF and poop smith

 
skunks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My brother had both dual cone type intake K&N and now the stock replacement type and he said the dual cone type intake was much louder, you can hear the turbos spool up as well as it having much better throttle response, as for the stock replacement type, he says it is smoothe, less jumpy when you tap the throttle and quiter and seems like it has more top end. Personnaly I like taping the gas and going/taking off, Zoom Zoom.
Old 05-27-02, 06:47 AM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

 
rxrotary2_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: southern NJ
Posts: 5,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i am a big fan of the diy "poor-man" style.
Old 05-27-02, 06:56 AM
  #8  
amp
old yella

iTrader: (50)
 
amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC | PA
Posts: 3,528
Received 97 Likes on 58 Posts
its perfect for those requiring better airflow that requires maintaining the stock airbox. ...cheaper in the longterm as well
Old 05-27-02, 07:24 AM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
djantlive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't notice any performance gains with the k&n drop in. I think you'll need to modify the stock air box to realize the benefit. The stock paper filter does fit better bc it's got plastic frame where as the k&n has a rubber soft frame which can be harder to position it perfectly in the airbox. If you aren't careful when you install the k&n, you could have a small leak in the intake bc the soft rubber frame doesn't easily sit in the airbox properly.
Old 05-27-02, 08:27 AM
  #10  
Adrenaline

 
RecKleSs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check your PM.
Old 05-27-02, 08:39 AM
  #11  
Full Member

 
twntrbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: elkview
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was a big waste of $55 iv ever spent! i could not tell the difference from the stock to the k&n drop in. I would put a few hundred more into a good intake if i were u.
Old 05-27-02, 10:16 AM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Based on my vacuum measurements, K&N drop in will not improve flow due to limiting restriction at the airbox inlet.

Need RB duct (non-track use) or another entry point for air (bottom, side) for K&N to help. Wire tie closure if the hinges break, as they often do.
Old 05-27-02, 11:10 AM
  #13  
Full Member

 
Wuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go Only with cold air!

After reading this you will know why not to put a cone in the engine bay without cold air:

http://www.rx7turboturbo.com/robrobi...od_pro_con.htm

http://www.rx7turboturbo.com/robrobi...ae_article.htm

The third-generation RX-7 had come off Mazda's rigorous development test programs on the bench and on the demanding Global Road Circuit section of the Miyoshi Proving Ground with flying colors. Yet, there was one arduous test left undone. When the car was taken to a race track near Tokyo known for its tight turns requiring short bursts of speed followed by fierce deceleration, the pride of Mazda's rotary rocket team quickly cooked its powerplant when pushed to the limit. Subsequent investigation revealed that air temperature at the entry area had risen as high as 50 C (122 F). Fresh air for the engine's consumption was taken from the single intake that also fed to the air-to-air intercooler. On wide-open driving, air flow reversed its course from the intercooler and went straight into the engine's intake. The intercooler was acting as an inter-heater! In the updated RX-7 with a designed fascia, fresh air is taken through a separate, dedicated duct guided by a newly installed air-guide. Air temperature at the engine's intake entry area has been halved to about 25 C ( 77 F), which adds about 7 kW (10bhp) to the output.

I went with K&N drop in and opend up the stock air box with three holes and tubes running to the front:
-cheap
-safe (cold air)
-quite
-good performance

What else you want?

Don't waste hundreds of $$$ for an intake. The power gain difference is Not worth it.
Old 05-27-02, 11:55 AM
  #14  
Junior Member

 
Forever22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a k&n before my apexi , my car runs much stronger with the apexi. its worth the $.
Old 05-28-02, 08:59 AM
  #15  
2 babies - no back seats

 
rotary-tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: N. Wilm., Delaware?
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will notice a major difference if you use it with the RB intake. I did not notice much before I put on the RB. I guess the poor man's would provide the same function. The stock airbox is too restrictive without either of these mods to notice a difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
07-17-19 02:20 PM
Carpe_Diem_7
Build Threads
32
03-29-16 03:28 PM
alexdimen
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
10-23-15 01:50 PM
vmerino
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
0
09-05-15 11:26 AM
AXA
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-05-15 10:06 AM



Quick Reply: Thoughts on K&N Drop in????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.