Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

BW turbo spool comparison between the S366 and SXE 369

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2015 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
AXA's Avatar
AXA
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Miami
BW turbo spool comparison between the S366 and SXE 369

Some info for comparison sake on both of this turbo... I was ask to post this on my ViPec thread by a nother forum member..

Drop by Rotary Werks and got dyno logs.. Wow I never thought it was going to be this much difference between the two..turbocharged Technology has come a long way ..

Red line BW SXE 369 with .91 A/R
Black line BW s366 with .91 A/R
Both at 12 psi at my WG spring boost pressures ... boost controller off..
You can also see the BW SXE 369 AFR are pig rich .. This one was the first pull we did with the SXE 369..
Attached Thumbnails BW turbo spool comparison between the S366 and SXE 369-image.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2015 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
So this was back to back( ie like within 30 minutes of each other)?

Zero other changes?

How would one figure there would be a difference in boost response if the turbine housings are the same( part numbers are even the same) and the turbine wheels are suppose ably the same too? I have some here, but I don't have any older SX units to compare them too... I have noticed the catalog lists a slightly minute difference in size, but there are also other typos too...

If anything the SXE69 should be slower than the older 66. It has a bigger compressor wheel. Obviously its slightly lighter, but I have never seen more than 50 RPM gain( also logged shaft speed) with moving to a drop in billet wheel( TDX stuff).
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Sep 2, 2015 | 05:20 PM
  #3  
AXA's Avatar
AXA
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Turblown
So this was back to back( ie like within 30 minutes of each other)? Zero other changes? How would one figure there would be a difference in boost response if the turbine housings are the same( part numbers are even the same) and the turbine wheels are suppose ably the same too? I have some here, but I don't have any older SX units to compare them too... I have noticed the catalog lists a slightly minute difference in size, but there are also other typos too... If anything the SXE69 should be slower than the older 66. It has a bigger compressor wheel. Obviously its slightly lighter, but I have never seen more than 50 RPM gain( also logged shaft speed) with moving to a drop in billet wheel( TDX stuff).

Was not done the same day.. Come on bro... This is just to share information not a real back to back test. The old s366 Dyno was done in June 2105 and the S369 in July 2015...
You can read in my post above the turbine housing was the same... Just change the turbo.. Exhaust wheel are the same in both turbo...
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2015 | 05:35 PM
  #4  
AXA's Avatar
AXA
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Miami
I forgot nothing else was change in the car except the turbo..
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 01:14 AM
  #5  
Neutron's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 664
Likes: 95
From: AZ
Looks about right to me. The 69 has quite a bit more lag. 66 is making quite a bit more power till about 5k then the 69 takes off which it should. It would be nice to see some high boost numbers from the 69. 12 psi seems to be a waste for this turbo.

Last edited by Neutron; Sep 3, 2015 at 02:02 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 06:59 AM
  #6  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by Neutron
Looks about right to me. The 69 has quite a bit more lag. 66 is making quite a bit more power till about 5k then the 69 takes off which it should. It would be nice to see some high boost numbers from the 69. 12 psi seems to be a waste for this turbo.
I totally looked at that graphs wrong ! It does look as one would expect. I fitted a sxe on a car last night and I am surprised at how large the compressor cover is !
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
AXA's Avatar
AXA
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Neutron
Looks about right to me. The 69 has quite a bit more lag. 66 is making quite a bit more power till about 5k then the 69 takes off which it should. It would be nice to see some high boost numbers from the 69. 12 psi seems to be a waste for this turbo.
Here is one at 18 psi we got 467 whp.. @ 20 psi we got 527 whp .. The 20 psi graph I need to get from the dyno computer...
Attached Thumbnails BW turbo spool comparison between the S366 and SXE 369-image.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2015 | 09:49 AM
  #8  
Rx7aholic's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 5
From: Morris Plains, NJ USA
Can you list the supporting mods to the engine? Streetport, or Stock and type of ecu?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2015 | 10:06 AM
  #9  
AXA's Avatar
AXA
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Rx7aholic
Can you list the supporting mods to the engine? Streetport, or Stock and type of ecu?

Semi peripheral Turbo II engine
High Comp Rotor
FD upper intake manifold

ECU VIPEC V88
FFE front wheel with hall sensor
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.