3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Thermowax Removal from TB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #1  
grimple1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
Thermowax Removal from TB

final question for the night (I promise!)

So I don't run coolant through the Throttle Body (it's looped from the rear back to the front housing) and have the AWS on the UIM blocked off.

Is it ok to remove the thermowax unit from the throttle body?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
cptpain's Avatar
Torqueless Wonder
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 3
From: Texas
On the FD is it not as simple as removing the hose coming from the block to the TB and plugging the holes?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
The thermowax uses the hot coolant to rotate the fast idle cam down and close the throttle plate to its normal resting position. If you remove the coolant hose but don't remove the thermowax, the fast idle cam will not come down completely. Thus the throttle plate will remain open slightly. You can see this if you monitor the TPS voltages--with the fast idle cam up ("cold") position, the narrow range voltage will usually be 1.10-1.20 volts. When the fast idle cam is rotated down, narrow range voltage will be maybe .80-1.00 volts. With the cam rotated down (like on a stock TB), the throttle plate opening angle is adjusted by the stop screw (throttle adjust screw).
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #4  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
how can the thermowax be completely removed with out any issues?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #5  
TimeMachine's Avatar
Bosozoomku
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by cptpain
On the FD is it not as simple as removing the hose coming from the block to the TB and plugging the holes?
Simply bypassing the TB is best. However, you do have to tie-off the cam or it will interfere.

I'm with the OP though... has anyone removed all those components altogether? Seems sensible enough.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #6  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Yes, many people have removed all those components.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #7  
grimple1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
Originally Posted by arghx
If you remove the coolant hose but don't remove the thermowax, the fast idle cam will not come down completely. Thus the throttle plate will remain open slightly. You can see this if you monitor the TPS voltages--with the fast idle cam up ("cold") position, the narrow range voltage will usually be 1.10-1.20 volts. When the fast idle cam is rotated down, narrow range voltage will be maybe .80-1.00 volts.

This might explain why I could never get both numbers on my TPS within range. Thermowax is gone!

Thanks all!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #8  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Did you use any block-off plates or plug the holes is any manner? Or can you just simply remove the unit?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
grimple1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
For the termowax I just took it off - I could weld it up but I'm not entirely sure it's needed as coolant *appears* to only flow through the holes - meaning I don't think it's a vacuum issue.

For the AWS on the UIM, I used block-off plates.



EDIT: I should state this is on a throttle body that is not yet on the car. I'm in the process of working on this one and cleaning and prepping the piece for either plating or painting (haven't decided yet). Linkage will be plated but debating the body itself. The UIM is already blocked off and this IS ON the car. The TB on the car has the coolant line bypassed but has all the units on the TB... (Thermowax, etc..) and does not have a safety wire holding the 2ndary choke mechanism open - I think I know now why it always idled funky.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
You can rotate the fast idle cam with your finger and see the throttle linkage thing rotate. That's what happens when the hot coolant moves the thermowax.


http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/3r...ov_nonseq.html , scroll down to step 19

thermowax removed:

Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #11  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by grimple1
For the termowax I just took it off - I could weld it up but I'm not entirely sure it's needed as coolant *appears* to only flow through the holes - meaning I don't think it's a vacuum issue.
That is what it looked like to me too but I just wanted to make sure before I just yanked it off there. I have all the other block-off plates installed. It always did irritate me that my TPS was always in spec on all but one closed setting.. Now I guess I know why. I never worried about it b/c everything always run perfectly. After I get that off there it should fall into spec no worries! Thanks for asking this question.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 02:11 AM
  #12  
RotorDream's Avatar
Rotary Ninja
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Wichita Falls, TX
about a month ago or so, I completely removed the TB, disassembled and reassembled it. during the reassemble, I removed the fast idle cam, thermowax unit, and basically everything except the throttle linkage, seems to be working perfectly. and I will admit, it looks a lot simpler.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
TimeMachine's Avatar
Bosozoomku
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by RotorDream
about a month ago or so, I completely removed the TB, disassembled and reassembled it. during the reassemble, I removed the fast idle cam, thermowax unit, and basically everything except the throttle linkage, seems to be working perfectly. and I will admit, it looks a lot simpler.
Did you replace the o-ring between the TB and intake elbow when you reinstalled? I can't seem to find a replacement, so I have been just reusing mine.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #14  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Originally Posted by TimeMachine
Did you replace the o-ring between the TB and intake elbow when you reinstalled? I can't seem to find a replacement, so I have been just reusing mine.
http://www.mazdatrix.com/c-2.htm

http://www.mazdatrix.com/getprice.as...m=13-W690-N390
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #15  
TimeMachine's Avatar
Bosozoomku
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Thanks
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #16  
RotorDream's Avatar
Rotary Ninja
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Originally Posted by TimeMachine
Did you replace the o-ring between the TB and intake elbow when you reinstalled? I can't seem to find a replacement, so I have been just reusing mine.
I used the silicon sensor safe gasket material, and haven't had a vacuum leak so far.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
I got my last TB gasket from Ray at Malloy. Surely he would have a few as well.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2020 | 07:44 PM
  #18  
Djseto's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 636
Likes: 197
From: NC
resurrecting this thread. Is there a How-To on how to remove the Thermowax system? I'm going to be upgrading from PFC to Haltech and I want to remove this and the dashpot to simplify my setup. Need to know what's involved and ultimately if I should do this or keep it.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2020 | 02:48 AM
  #19  
Ceylon's Avatar
Non Runner
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 282
From: Somerset, England
Just unbolt the thermowax and coolant pipe section from the TB, wind in the idle bleed screw then out half a turn and re set up the TB, there are guides for this on here.

For the coolant, easiest option is to run a hose from the nipple on the rear iron to the WP housing directly to bypass the TB. If you're feeling keen and don't want a coolant pipe running under the UIM then you can remove the nipples and tap them for an 1/8 NPT plug. The rear iron one can be fun to remove with the engine in the car, so I'd be carful with this option.

After having FD's with and without personally I'd keep it, the system works well.

Last edited by Ceylon; Nov 30, 2020 at 02:58 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2020 | 01:11 PM
  #20  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
Yeah it's not hard, just run the hose that normally goes from the rear iron to the TB from the rear iron to the WP housing. Trying to cap those nipples ends up in failure more often than not.

The thermowax is held to the TB with screws, make sure to use a Vessel-type screwdriver or an impact driver to remove them. They are TIGHT and can strip easily.

Dale
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88rx7gxlturbo
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
Apr 20, 2012 06:09 PM
Relisys190
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Jul 8, 2003 09:31 PM
IAN
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
12
May 16, 2003 09:30 PM
M.C. Language
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
May 22, 2002 04:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.