3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

premium gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #1  
blknfury's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: north carolina
premium gas

what happens if you dont use premium gas in your 93-95 fd and use regular? my friend has a 96 supercharged mustang cobra and he uses regular. he has never had any problems with his engine
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #2  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
you should really try a search first!! Here you go. a few threads on it.
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/what-do-you-guys-think-fuel-463830/
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...on+octane+fuel
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #3  
nopistons94's Avatar
white FD lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: central jerzy
you don't have to bother searching. Do it and boost and your motor won't run long.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
2FAST7S's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 1
From: Carmel, NY
Originally Posted by nopistons94
you don't have to bother searching. Do it and boost and your motor won't run long.
Not necessarily...run low boost levels and if you have a stand alone ecu tune it to run safe on lower octane gas. You will not make too much power and if you do youre chances of detonating are increased thats all
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
Originally Posted by 2FAST7S
Not necessarily...run low boost levels and if you have a stand alone ecu tune it to run safe on lower octane gas. You will not make too much power and if you do youre chances of detonating are increased thats all
I love it! you might pop the engine, but that's all. I am freaking out about using my shitty pump crack 91 oct., so maybe that sheds some light. I am stock with DP, intake. I am hoping for the extra reassurance of keeping out of danger.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #6  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
If you are worried about premium gas, sell the ******* car. How's that for a simple answer?

sonix7: I told you this in your previous thread but you have zero to worry about running around on 91 octane with the stock ecu.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #7  
legal-z's Avatar
12th son of the lama
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: albany, ny
Originally Posted by rynberg
If you are worried about premium gas, sell the ******* car. How's that for a simple answer?
I Agree 100%. even if premium is $.40 more a gallon, you're talking about maybe an extra 12 bucks a week and that's if you're driving almost 400 miles a week with your car. if you can't afford an extra $12 a week, you can't afford an fd. you'd have to run on 87 octane without blowing up for almost 5 years to save enough on gas to equal the cost of the motor you're going to have to replace when it pings. and that's figuring only $3000 for a rebuild and associated parts and labor (which is a lowball estimate) divided by the $12/week you're saving.

where i am, premium is only about $.15 more a gallon, which makes the above numbers look even more rediculous when trying to justify using 87 octane.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #8  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
Originally Posted by rynberg
If you are worried about premium gas, sell the ******* car. How's that for a simple answer?

sonix7: I told you this in your previous thread but you have zero to worry about running around on 91 octane with the stock ecu.
Thats fine and I respect your advice, I am just trying to learn as much as I can about this. I know you are not madd at me for that? I am not tripping out, I just don't like what I heard about low octane gas, like regular unleaded which is like 87 octane out here.Then after reading about gas pumps advertising the RON and not the actual octane got me a little worried. Is 91 octane really 91 octane or in the high 80's. See what I am saying? I just did my hose job and threw on an intake, I am flowing real nice on boost and the other day I saw it spike up. I just want to make sure the dense *** air up here and my mods don't cause me my original 45,000 mile engine. Feel me? I am educating myself through you all, please be patient with me. Sorry if I have asked questions more than once, I want everyones opinions. thanx guys.

Last edited by sonix7; Sep 17, 2005 at 04:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by sonix7
Then after reading about gas pumps advertising the RON and not the actual octane got me a little worried. Is 91 octane really 91 octane or in the high 80's.
NO! The US does NOT advertise RON only, like other countries do. The displayed octane is the average between the RON (research octane) and the MON (motor octane). Any of the good national brands (Shell, Chevron, 76) will err on the side of caution with these octanes. Some tests of random stations have shown the actual octane being about 1 point higher than advertised.

If you are buying 91 octane, that's what you are getting! (barring a mistake in filling the pumps..)

Originally Posted by sonix7
I just want to make sure the dense *** air up here and my mods don't cause me my original 45,000 mile engine.
The air is LESS dense if you live at higher altitude = car running richer = car running "safer". You have nothing to worry about! If you are that concerned about it, then either stop modding or move on to a different vehicle.

No anger here, just getting sick of misinformation being passed along.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
thank you for correcting me on my mistake. I am just trying to learn, not spread mis-information, all I have been inquiring about is the truth. thank you for helping me. I understand your frustration. Its cool.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #11  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by nopistons94
you don't have to bother searching. Do it and boost and your motor won't run long.


What a load of crap. Do you actually think Mazda would really expect it's customers to solely run the recommended 91 octane in their Rx7? Every manufacturer programs there ecu's to leave a margin of safety for lower grade fuels. Mazda would be stupid to not program the ecu this way. Otherwise every Rx7 they build would have stock engines that would need rebuilding because someone put in 87 octane. Mazda isn't stupid enough to put themselves in those kinds of warranty related issues. This is one of the main reasons the stock ecu runs so rich under boost. Thats how they compensate for lower grades of fuel if they are actually used. You can actually drive the car with 87 octane and boost it. Just make sure your car is stock with stock boost levels with no modifications. I have 98k original miles and currently have 89 in my car right now with no ill effects. I would go down to 87 (because of fuel prices)but I have a down pipe and modified stock air intake with manual boost controller. I don't think the ecu will compensate for this with 87 in the tank since I get a small spike to 11psi during transition. If I was 100% stock I wouldn't worry about it.

Last edited by t-von; Sep 17, 2005 at 05:59 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #12  
BLKTOPTRVL's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 16
From: South Carolina
Hmmm, around here, regular is 2.88 and premium is 3.08. For a 7% difference. I don't see that it is worth taking the chance. However, if you read the manual, it says you can run the car on less than premium gas. It should compensate for the lack of octane.

But my question is, do YOU really want to take the chance of destroying an engine for the extra cost of premium over a year? (~$90 - $100)

Not worth it if you ask me. What it comes down to really is, you can't afford the car. Sell it before you destroy it.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 02:56 AM
  #13  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
The price difference doesn't change the fact that it is perfectly safe in a completely stock car. Too many people on this forum are just plain paranoid.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 06:49 AM
  #14  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by t-von
.....You can actually drive the car with 87 octane and boost it. Just make sure your car is stock with stock boost levels with no modifications.....I have 98k original miles and currently have 89 in my car right now with no ill effects. I would go down to 87 (because of fuel prices)but I have a down pipe and modified stock air intake with manual boost controller. I don't think the ecu will compensate for this with 87 in the tank since I get a small spike to 11psi during transition. If I was 100% stock I wouldn't worry about it.
My car is also still close to stock. And I'm aware that the stock ECU is set a bit rich as a safetu margin. But this is not to say that I want to test it. IMHO, it's not worth it. I spend a couple of extra bucks to get decent oil, a good filter and I'm generaly careful about maintenance. Why would I buy 87 or even 89 in order to save what....a dollar on the average fill-up? As my engine gets older I tend to want more of a safety margin, not less.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 07:57 AM
  #15  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
My car is also still close to stock. And I'm aware that the stock ECU is set a bit rich as a safetu margin. But this is not to say that I want to test it. IMHO, it's not worth it. I spend a couple of extra bucks to get decent oil, a good filter and I'm generaly careful about maintenance. Why would I buy 87 or even 89 in order to save what....a dollar on the average fill-up? As my engine gets older I tend to want more of a safety margin, not less.
my point exactly, that is why I have been inquiring about higher than 91 oct. safety measures. Not that I am scared, because I treat my car like a baby, I want it to be happy and healthy.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #16  
nopistons94's Avatar
white FD lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: central jerzy
Originally Posted by t-von
What a load of crap. Do you actually think Mazda would really expect it's customers to solely run the recommended 91 octane in their Rx7? Every manufacturer programs there ecu's to leave a margin of safety for lower grade fuels. Mazda would be stupid to not program the ecu this way. Otherwise every Rx7 they build would have stock engines that would need rebuilding because someone put in 87 octane. Mazda isn't stupid enough to put themselves in those kinds of warranty related issues. This is one of the main reasons the stock ecu runs so rich under boost. Thats how they compensate for lower grades of fuel if they are actually used. You can actually drive the car with 87 octane and boost it. Just make sure your car is stock with stock boost levels with no modifications. I have 98k original miles and currently have 89 in my car right now with no ill effects. I would go down to 87 (because of fuel prices)but I have a down pipe and modified stock air intake with manual boost controller. I don't think the ecu will compensate for this with 87 in the tank since I get a small spike to 11psi during transition. If I was 100% stock I wouldn't worry about it.

dude honestly, your ******* retarted. You go run your 89 or 87 and enjoy. :thumbsup:
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 02:11 AM
  #17  
mesallem's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: California
It's ok to run 87 octane. Your engine is tuned to 91, meaning your compression and detonation of your air fuel mixture are made for 91. If you accidently put 87 in there, you really won't see much of a difference, just some possible tone change in your engine, and maybe a sputter hear and there. But because your engine is tuned for 91, constant driving using undergrade fuel MAY, the KEY WORD IS MAY, cause your engine to detonate incorrectly and cause engine failure. T
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 02:35 AM
  #18  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by nopistons94
dude honestly, your ******* retarted. You go run your 89 or 87 and enjoy. :thumbsup:

What a typical response form someone who obviously doesn't have any real knowledge about this subject. I bet I have more original miles on my engine than you do young one. With lower grade fuel I might add.

Last edited by t-von; Sep 19, 2005 at 02:43 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 02:37 AM
  #19  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
My car is also still close to stock. And I'm aware that the stock ECU is set a bit rich as a safetu margin. But this is not to say that I want to test it. IMHO, it's not worth it. I spend a couple of extra bucks to get decent oil, a good filter and I'm generaly careful about maintenance. Why would I buy 87 or even 89 in order to save what....a dollar on the average fill-up? As my engine gets older I tend to want more of a safety margin, not less.


I understand the cost savings is irrelevant however, the subject matter is whether it is safe or not.

Last edited by t-von; Sep 19, 2005 at 02:42 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 05:31 AM
  #20  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by t-von
I understand the cost savings is irrelevant however, the subject matter is whether it is safe or not.
Well, in my mind, the two are inter-linked. If your running a lower grade fuel on a regular basis, I have to think it's for the cost savings.
To me, it's like smoking. Since not everyone immediately dies from it, for a number of years it's easy to think it's not particularly "unsafe". But then one day, maybe on a particularly cold morning you briefly go WOT to get onto the freeway....
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #21  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
But then one day, maybe on a particularly cold morning you briefly go WOT to get onto the freeway....


Very real possibility there however if everything is working perfectly don't underestimate how much leeway a super rich A/F ratio will give you. One of these days I'm going to install a wideband on my stock car just to get some readings.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #22  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by t-von
... One of these days I'm going to install a wideband on my stock car just to get some readings.
I'm sure alot of guys would also be interested in those results if you could post them, I know I would be. And not just because of this particular discussion. I guess I'm just curious.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #23  
nopistons94's Avatar
white FD lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: central jerzy
Originally Posted by t-von
What a typical response form someone who obviously doesn't have any real knowledge about this subject. I bet I have more original miles on my engine than you do young one. With lower grade fuel I might add.


typical response from someone whos not cheap? yea


noticed I was a little harsh on my wording, so I edited it for you and put a smiley face to smooth it over.

Last edited by nopistons94; Sep 19, 2005 at 02:35 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
userjh5174
Alternative Fuels
1
Jan 9, 2016 08:49 AM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM
rattlehead
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 25, 2015 10:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.