3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

a mothballed FD on ebay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #26  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by SpiritRex7
all the stereos in the fd3s are bose head units... its just not the special touring bose package... i think
All the FDs with CD players have the same CD player, the Bose equipped cars use a non-amplified head unit while the others are amplified. The Bose cars have amps in the speakers.

No 1995 FD came with Bose anyway, Mazda dropped the Touring for 95 and with it the Bose option died. In 1995 there was PEG/PEP, Base and R2 models available.

Jeff
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #27  
4Fun's Avatar
Dont make me Laugh
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: All Hope is Lost
one 1/4 mile at a time, now thats alot of track time
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 11:37 PM
  #28  
Enconsiderate's Avatar
I am so smrt.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
I'd hit it!
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #29  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
If it was a 93 R1 in CYM, that would be a lot more interesting... with the automatic in a common color... ehh... I'd rather buy a nice looking used one for around 15k and then have 10k for mods and another 10k left for a beater
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #30  
danmc77's Avatar
Republican and proud
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Automatics suck! Sorry auto guys, but I had one for two years and regretted it every day. I sold it. Now I'm looking to get another FD, but I won't even concider an auto. Not to mention that $37,000 is way too much. I understand it's never been titled, but it is almost 10 years old. I'd rather buy a used one for 1/4 the price and not feel guilty about driving it. Why the hell did they make autos anyway? Sports cars should only have manual transmissions.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #31  
technician's Avatar
Drunken Master
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Not to mention that $37,000 is way too much. I understand it's never been titled, but it is almost 10 years old
So using your method of shopping for vehicles...you'd only pay $8K for a '95 Ferrari? The RX-7 is NOT a bloody Honda for crying out loud. If you want a sports car then you'd better be willing to pay for one.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #32  
danmc77's Avatar
Republican and proud
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
I am willing to pay for one... Just not $37,000. To keep it's value, you wouldn't be able to drive it or tune it. So what's the point in buying it unless you have a collection of cars you don't drive.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #33  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
Its worth the money. Everything has its price. Just because many people complain that its not worth it doesn't mean its not. What it means is that they wouldn't pay for it. Yes, it is unfortunate it wasn't Silver or White with a stick. But if it was, it would be $60k? Maybe even more.

As for the tires, they are still considered new because the car hasn't really been driven buy 120 miles. Its probably the original tires on it still. I bought a '96 Spyder VR4 with 9k miles with the original tires on it. It wasn't dry rotted or anything. As long as the cars are garaged and covered it should be fine.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:00 PM
  #34  
rotoboy661's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
From: kali
143 miles????

hmm u know that those miles are probably were from test drives

and u guys also know that when we test drive new car, in this case a sports car we rev the sh*t out of it, rebuild anyone?????

i wouldnt buy it for that reason (o and its cuz its auto)

mike
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #35  
danmc77's Avatar
Republican and proud
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
I like to see someone pay $60,000 for a stock RX7. Don't get me wrong guys, I love FD's... But that doesn't make them worth any more $. Dude, I'm sure some jackass will buy it for $37,000 and boost the prices up for all of us. I'm sure the car will be a collectors item one day and be worth $60,000, but it isn't today. How the heck does an RX7 sit for 10 years and nobody drive it? They must be the jackasses.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #36  
diablone's Avatar
.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 26
From: -
Originally Posted by danmc77
I like to see someone pay $60,000 for a stock RX7. Don't get me wrong guys, I love FD's... But that doesn't make them worth any more $. Dude, I'm sure some jackass will buy it for $37,000 and boost the prices up for all of us. I'm sure the car will be a collectors item one day and be worth $60,000, but it isn't today. How the heck does an RX7 sit for 10 years and nobody drive it? They must be the jackasses.
A person is a jackass for not driving a car? Don't just throw in "jackass" when you don't know what you're talking about.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #37  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by dcfc3s
BTW, I remember YEARS back that one of the guys that founded Napster had an ULTRA low mileage (like under 1000) CYM parked in his *living room* with the window sticker on it. Now THAT'S the car you mothball!

Dale
I have a picture of this at home. ive talked to shawn fanning a bit and he had a very mint 94 Silver R2 that had really low miles and I dont believe the CYM was his, it was a friend I think. But yes, he had it with window sticker and all in his living room!

Im at work right now, but I'll post the picture when i get home later
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #38  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by rotoboy661
143 miles????

hmm u know that those miles are probably were from test drives

and u guys also know that when we test drive new car, in this case a sports car we rev the sh*t out of it, rebuild anyone?????

i wouldnt buy it for that reason (o and its cuz its auto)

mike
And what about every FD in the world? How do you know they werent test driven? what a stupid answer
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #39  
95R2-89TII Ground Zero's Avatar
Banned
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, MI
The car must have been in a 10 year time capsule.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #40  
Mr. Stock's Avatar
1993 RX7 R1
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mecman
These cars sold for $34K brand new in 1993. I don't think 37 is unreasonable.
They stickered for ~$34K. They sold for much less.
And the reason that they were selling for much less?
The same reason why, I believe, this one was never sold - lack of demand for them.

They will have to sell this for much less than what they are asking for.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #41  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
Originally Posted by danmc77
I like to see someone pay $60,000 for a stock RX7. Don't get me wrong guys, I love FD's... But that doesn't make them worth any more $. Dude, I'm sure some jackass will buy it for $37,000 and boost the prices up for all of us. I'm sure the car will be a collectors item one day and be worth $60,000, but it isn't today. How the heck does an RX7 sit for 10 years and nobody drive it? They must be the jackasses.
This is a sign of envy. Why does the buyer of the $37k RX7 have to be a Jackass?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:43 PM
  #42  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
Originally Posted by rotoboy661
143 miles????

hmm u know that those miles are probably were from test drives

and u guys also know that when we test drive new car, in this case a sports car we rev the sh*t out of it, rebuild anyone?????

i wouldnt buy it for that reason (o and its cuz its auto)

mike

OK NOW! Rebuild after 143 miles, sure ok. You must be one of those drivers that drive the **** out of the RX7. I don't think anyone with common sense and courtesy will drive the **** out of a car they don't own.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:49 PM
  #43  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Mr. Stock
They stickered for ~$34K. They sold for much less.
And the reason that they were selling for much less?
The same reason why, I believe, this one was never sold - lack of demand for them.

They will have to sell this for much less than what they are asking for.

Not true! I sold several RX7s. Recently sold a 1995 RX7 for $25k with 40k miles, the owner decided he didn't want the car after one month. He resold the car for the same price. A lot of guys on here don't understand and appreciate the rarity of the FD now. Sure there wasn't a demand for a $40k car back 9-11 years ago, because the economy was down and everyone was demanding a economical Honda. But now the guys who always wanted an FD back 9-11 years ago has the money to buy one. Problem is that there isn't any more new FDs. So the next best thing is to buy a low mileage FD in mint condition. In this case they will pay the market demand. How many low mileage mint FDs are there out there? Not many. Not sure if many of you know about the MKIV Supras but some sell for more than new. The Supra is even rarer than the FD in turbocharged form. Why do Ferraris go for more than new? Take the 360 Modena as an example. Low production high demand. Unfortunately the demand for our cars wasn't back 9-11 years ago, but the demand is now and in the future. 20 years from now we will remember how raw of a sports car a FD is, and will pay a pretty penny for a very nice one. It will be sentimental for us true FD lovers. For those who don't care, the FD is probably just a regular fast car to you.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:56 PM
  #44  
danmc77's Avatar
Republican and proud
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
A car is meant to be driven. If you want to collect cars, fine. I wish I had the $ to do that. I was making a joke saying "How can you have an RX7 for 10 years and not dive it?" Meaning I wouldn't have the will power to not drive it.
Whatever. This is a stupid argument.
Oh, Diablone, I didn't know you were a professional car collector and appraiser. Is that what makes you so qualified to discuss what it's worth and why I don't know what I'm talking about?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #45  
FD_dave's Avatar
Thread Starter
zoom zoom
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: bay area
i dunno, i'm not really that against autos. i think it's nice 'cuz it lets a lot of people (esp us stupid americans =P) to enjoy special cars like the FD. and if i were married or have a gf and she doesn't drive stick, then it's nice to let her be able to enjoy it as well. plus it's so convenient. when i'm stuck in traffic here in LA, lots of times i wish i had an auto. i mean, if i were really rich and had lots of money, i'd have 2 FD's, one i have now and a nice auto touring w/ all the goodies as my "commuter" car

but yeah 37k is a lot for this car. if it were an R2 or something special, then it's different. it's still nice tho
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:59 PM
  #46  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by turbotuner.com
Its worth the money.
Maybe to you, it is. Once it's driven off the lot, however, it's just another used '95 automatic, and they're not worth a hell of a lot right now. The only distinction would be the low mileage, and like danmc77 said, that's only worth something to a collector.

As for the tires, they are still considered new because the car hasn't really been driven buy 120 miles. Its probably the original tires on it still.
Then why would the add make a point of mentioning new tires? They probably developed flat spots from sitting so long without moving.

STORING TIRES MOUNTED ON VEHICLES
It is best to store a vehicle on blocks to remove all weight from the tires. If the vehicle cannot be blocked up from the storage surface, completely unload it so minimum weight will rest on the tires. Keep tires inflated to recommended operating inflation pressure. The surface should be firm, reasonably level, well drained and clean. Do not store on blacktop or oil stabilized surfaces.

Move the vehicle at least every three months to prevent ozone cracking in the bulge area and also to prevent a "flat spot" from developing (due to strain from deflection).
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #47  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
Jim, a FD with only 1** miles is meant for a collector and not a driver. It is quite obvious. Thats why I say its worth it. Like I mentioned earlier, some people see the FD as a regular car. Some people see the FD as something special, I see the FD that way.

Who knows how the guy stored those tires, maybe he did do exactly like you said. Sure he wants to mention its new tires because literally they are new with 1** so miles on it. People may automatically think its dry rotted or has flat spots like you mentioned, due to age. Or maybe the car was driven 1 mile a week or something. Who knows unless you talk to the owner.

Originally Posted by jimlab
Maybe to you, it is. Once it's driven off the lot, however, it's just another used '95 automatic, and they're not worth a hell of a lot right now. The only distinction would be the low mileage, and like danmc77 said, that's only worth something to a collector.

Then why would the add make a point of mentioning new tires? They probably developed flat spots from sitting so long without moving.

STORING TIRES MOUNTED ON VEHICLES
It is best to store a vehicle on blocks to remove all weight from the tires. If the vehicle cannot be blocked up from the storage surface, completely unload it so minimum weight will rest on the tires. Keep tires inflated to recommended operating inflation pressure. The surface should be firm, reasonably level, well drained and clean. Do not store on blacktop or oil stabilized surfaces.

Move the vehicle at least every three months to prevent ozone cracking in the bulge area and also to prevent a "flat spot" from developing (due to strain from deflection).
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 02:08 PM
  #48  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by turbotuner.com
Who knows unless you talk to the owner.
You seem to, unless you're just making a lot of assumptions on his behalf.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #49  
EVS.TurboTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 16
From: Texas
I'm making assumptions just like you are making assumptions that he didn't properly store the car.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #50  
rajeevx7's Avatar
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
Hah!!
(1 mile/week x52) x ~8 = 416
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.