3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Innovate wideband intermittent error code 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 08:42 AM
  #1  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Innovate wideband intermittent error code 8

I've been using the LC-2 wideband for almost a year now (under 3k miles) and have had an intermittent error code 8 (sensor timing error, manual says typically a damaged sensor). Started happening after a few months of use. Doesn't happen all the time and goes away after turning off/restarting the car.

Unit is wired correctly with an isolated power source, which is the radio relay for the removed Bose system.

I've been using the heat sink bung extender from the get go. The sensor is installed in an old school PFS downpipe just before the main cat. It is not in the top half of the pipe as Bosch recommends, but it is close to the 3:00 position, a bit below. I don't think the sensor is getting condensation damage due to the bung extender shielding it and I always start the car immediately and don't allow the sensor to heat up before the exhaust.

I tried the free air recalibrate.

I put in a different sensor after a few months, calibrated, and same issue happened immediately.

I have not tried re-flashing firmware.

Under boost I am running rich (10.5), so I'd really like to take some fuel out. I still have the air pump hooked up and it's at 18-19 AFR at idle. Cruise is close to 14 or so.

City low rev cruising the AFR reads really lean like 22 when the air pump is on. I have a suspicion this is when the sensor throws the code, but haven't confirmed. I don't think it ever threw the code until I reconnected the air pump clutch connector.

Page 3 of this thread really sharpens some of my suspicions about the setup's reliabilty: https://www.miataturbo.net/ecus-tuni...s-84638/page3/

Last edited by alexdimen; Oct 3, 2018 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
Khan Racing's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 102
Likes: 7
From: Boston, MA
I've had numerous issues with my old LC-2 that eventually failed on me during dyno tuning. After going through multiple LC-2's I eventually switched to an AEM X-series and have had no issues thus far. They aren't that expensive either.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 10:27 AM
  #3  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
I personally think Innovate has bad heater control of their sensors and that's why they overheat. The whole heat sink thing is a joke. I've used the actual Bosch wideband system (thousands of dollars, lab grade, sold by their subsidiary ETAS to commercial customers) and it never overheats sensors even throwing sustained 950C+ exhaust at the sensors (around 1800 F). You don't have to put in a heat sink either.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 10:30 AM
  #4  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Originally Posted by Khan Racing
I've had numerous issues with my old LC-2 that eventually failed on me during dyno tuning. After going through multiple LC-2's I eventually switched to an AEM X-series and have had no issues thus far. They aren't that expensive either.
Ugh... thanks. I was afraid I'd have to buy a second unit. Wish I'd seen this when shopping. I like the fact that wiring is simplified by the controller intgreated into gauge.

I enjoy your instagram btw!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 10:39 AM
  #5  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Originally Posted by arghx
I personally think Innovate has bad heater control of their sensors and that's why they overheat. The whole heat sink thing is a joke. I've used the actual Bosch wideband system (thousands of dollars, lab grade, sold by their subsidiary ETAS to commercial customers) and it never overheats sensors even throwing sustained 950C+ exhaust at the sensors (around 1800 F). You don't have to put in a heat sink either.
Great, another waste of $$ Do you see any harm in keeping the heat sink with this or the AEM? Or should I just put it on the shelf with my other oddities and trinkets?

I spent like a freaking day sanding a crush washer to get the hole on it clocked right.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
Molotovman's Avatar
Ban Peak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 550
From: Northern Virginia
I've had mixed results with Innovate widebands but still run an MTX-L Plus. I had to replace the first sensor within 1,500 miles of use and this second one has a similar amount of miles and I believe it may be acting up again.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2018 | 11:57 AM
  #7  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Still haven't tried reflashing the firmware because I'm trying one thing at a time.

So I had this same problem early on about two months in to use. Swapped sensor and calibrated - same problem. I decided to re-check wiring connections - good connections - no issues. The only other change I made is I routed the cable better and placed the coiled sensor cable flat in the center of the passenger footwell under the floor mat. The coiled section of cable had been right next to the blower motor and on top of the ECU. The problem went away. I thought it could have been a signal interference problem due to proximity to the blower motor (magnetic field, motor operation inducing current/voltage/etc in the coiled cable). Seems plausible, right?

Fast forward... I recently moved all that around again putting in a bigger aftermarket blower motor. Throws E8 on the WB almost immediately. So I look at cable routing again. It's right next to the ECU again and the cable is running along with the harness - I guess I moved it all and kinda routed it under the kick panel this time.

So, I take the cable where it goes thru the firewall and was running next to harness and separate it best I can. Then I move the coil back to the center of the footwell away from the ecu and blower. No WB errors on the ride in to work. We'll see how it does next drive... has anyone else experienced something like this?

Last edited by alexdimen; Oct 5, 2018 at 12:05 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Several drives and still no sign of old error code 8 since moving the sensor cable away from ECU, main engine harness, and blower motor.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2020 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Cleaned the car, moved the cable, and the damn error code came back with a vengeance. I'm pretty sure EMI is causing the issue, so I bought some conductive EMI shielding tape an Amazon
LINK LINK
, wrapped the sensor wire, and grounded it to chassis with a ring terminal. Drove around for an hour or so and so far so good.

Reply
Old Mar 31, 2020 | 09:34 PM
  #10  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
I've always had problems with the the Innovate throwing an error. I added my own additional DIY heat sink (a bent piece of aluminum plate) that has helped a lot, but it still throws the error when sitting in traffic.


Reply
Old Apr 2, 2020 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
I personally think the heat sink thing is voodoo, especially as far down the pipe as mine is mounted.

What error code did you get? 8 Same as mine?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2020 | 10:58 AM
  #12  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
I think there is something to it getting hot - it seems to work better when there is air flow. However, I get an error on a different car with an LC-1 mounted further back on its header (and certainly not as hot), so it could be they just have, and had, a bad design. I won't buy anymore WB sensors from them.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2020 | 12:32 PM
  #13  
alexdimen's Avatar
Thread Starter
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Update - Still running without a single error code since I EMI shielded the wire. Think I finally found the fix.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2020 | 07:25 AM
  #14  
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
ArmitageFD3S
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 26
From: Herndon, Virginia
Thanks for sharing. I'm going to have to try that, since I randomly get E8 or sometimes the gauge just pegs all the way at full lean and stays there till I reset it.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 06:53 AM
  #15  
Alchemyst6's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 94
Likes: 9
From: Smyrna, GA
Thanks for the EMI tape idea! I have the Speedhut AFR gauge and was having similar issues with the AFR’s jumping like crazy. This fixed the issue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tetsu50
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
29
Sep 12, 2019 04:34 PM
cewrx7r1
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 3, 2013 10:43 AM
sleeperfc
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
Jan 4, 2006 06:21 PM
jpandes
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
Apr 2, 2004 05:21 AM
markusparkus
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Feb 2, 2003 04:34 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.