Increase Rev Limiter. Lightweight Flywheel / Stock Internals
#1
Increase Rev Limiter. Lightweight Flywheel / Stock Internals
Can someone please advise on whether or not I can safely raise my rev limiter given that I have a lightweight flywheel and stock internals (never balanced for flywheel)?
If I understand correctly, the OE limit is 8300 rpm. Can I increase over that, should I decrease below that, or simply maintain OE limit? My goal is to be able to really rev out 2nd gear for autox purposes. On track and other high load / high gear /high performance driving instances I would shift at ~ 8K (when I see the needle pointing at 3 O'clock).
If I understand correctly, the OE limit is 8300 rpm. Can I increase over that, should I decrease below that, or simply maintain OE limit? My goal is to be able to really rev out 2nd gear for autox purposes. On track and other high load / high gear /high performance driving instances I would shift at ~ 8K (when I see the needle pointing at 3 O'clock).
#3
As far as a 3.9 rear end, that is the complete opposite of what I want for autox. Considering the 4.77 rear, actually, to get more acceleration.
Lastly, such high speed sections are few and far apart (if at all) at an autox. I would just like to know I have the RPM if I need it
#4
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
Hmm...If you jump all the way up to the 4.77 no matter how high you wanna over rev the motor there is no way you will be able to stay in 2nd gear if you are already having problems with it. I would think the 4.22 would be a better option. If shift speed is a concern maybe an affordable dogbox would suite you well.
#5
Hmm...If you jump all the way up to the 4.77 no matter how high you wanna over rev the motor there is no way you will be able to stay in 2nd gear if you are already having problems with it. I would think the 4.22 would be a better option. If shift speed is a concern maybe an affordable dogbox would suite you well.
Shifting and rev limiter are NOT currently a problem with my 4.1 gears. In fact, I never get close to redline. A good compromise would be a 4.66 diff, but I would rather do the diff right with the 4.77 now and balance the motor later for a 9K redline rather than having to go back and redo the diff to match the engine capabilities post rebuild.
I appreciate your help and all, but none of this is answering my question. I just want to know what the safe rev limit would be given my flywheel. Please let me worry about shifting, final drive, and other issues.
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Will a 4.77 allow you to stay in 3rd instead of 2nd at similar speeds?? If you don't mind losing your topend and highway cruise rpm I say do it.
Or try a taller tire and maybe a 3.90, that should allow you to run a little more mph outa 2nd gear.
to take advantage of stock porting and APEX SEAL Springs you should shift around 7500 anyway, no need for the super high rpm with stock ports and parts. there is a reason mazda put the rev limiter where it is...chatterchatterchatter
Flywheel shouldn't be a issue. unless it is a pos
Or try a taller tire and maybe a 3.90, that should allow you to run a little more mph outa 2nd gear.
to take advantage of stock porting and APEX SEAL Springs you should shift around 7500 anyway, no need for the super high rpm with stock ports and parts. there is a reason mazda put the rev limiter where it is...chatterchatterchatter
Flywheel shouldn't be a issue. unless it is a pos
Trending Topics
#11
Mr Sparkles
iTrader: (12)
If the rotating assembly was still stock I would say you should have no problem turning up the rev limiter to 9k. Mazda does a pretty good job of balancing the rotating assembly at the factory, the only real issue is the fact that you have changed out the stock flywheel to a counter weight that is not balanced to the rest of the assembly.
I personally would not raise the rev limiter more then a few hundred RPM unless I had the internals balanced but I do lean towards the conservative side on issues like this.
For those that don’t understand the reasoning of a 4.77 and a higher rev limiter. It is simple; the goal is to keep the engine in its peak power band 100% of the time with as few shifts as possible. The stock gearing is to low when exiting low speed corners and you will lug for a few tenths while building boost. A 4.77 solves this problem but limits you at the top end which can be an issue on faster courses.
Hope this helps,
Dan
I personally would not raise the rev limiter more then a few hundred RPM unless I had the internals balanced but I do lean towards the conservative side on issues like this.
For those that don’t understand the reasoning of a 4.77 and a higher rev limiter. It is simple; the goal is to keep the engine in its peak power band 100% of the time with as few shifts as possible. The stock gearing is to low when exiting low speed corners and you will lug for a few tenths while building boost. A 4.77 solves this problem but limits you at the top end which can be an issue on faster courses.
Hope this helps,
Dan
#13
Mr Sparkles
iTrader: (12)
Safe? No idea, you may already have an issue and not know it. Best way I know to tell is monitor knock. Do a few pulls to 8k and get a base line of the engine noise between 6.5 and 8k. Then slowly bump up the rev limiter and monitor the knock. If the base raises past 8k then your engine internal are out of balance and you should probably not push it. If the base stays the same or decreases.... crank it up
Think of it like an out of balanced wheel, you know how at different speeds you will have a shimmy and at others all feels good. What you are watching for in the knock reading is the shimmy .
On my motor the knock sensor is super sensitive, my base at 7k is around 25 and it decreases as the rpm's go up to 10 at 9k.
Dan
Think of it like an out of balanced wheel, you know how at different speeds you will have a shimmy and at others all feels good. What you are watching for in the knock reading is the shimmy .
On my motor the knock sensor is super sensitive, my base at 7k is around 25 and it decreases as the rpm's go up to 10 at 9k.
Dan
#15
Right, they only warranty it up to a certain point, then the parts start to fail after that point. Hence the warranty.
"Dan to the rescue! So like 8500 rpm would be a safe bet."
Sounds like you just needed somebody to give you the answer you were wanting to hear. Why come here and try to get validation from a complete stranger who provided no evidence to support the case?
"Dan to the rescue! So like 8500 rpm would be a safe bet."
Sounds like you just needed somebody to give you the answer you were wanting to hear. Why come here and try to get validation from a complete stranger who provided no evidence to support the case?
Dan happens to be the '09 SSM National Champion and a reputable tuner. FYI.
Additionally, it seems to be commonly accepted practice of most tuners to raise the rev limiter of stock motor to 9000rpm safely (w/ oe flywheel in place for proper balance). Forget mazda specs, rev'er up.
(Why do I always get into battles when I start threads here... )
#16
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
As I mentioned earlier, taller rear wheels & tires might help you. Are you installing wider fenders?
#18
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Safe? No idea, you may already have an issue and not know it. Best way I know to tell is monitor knock. Do a few pulls to 8k and get a base line of the engine noise between 6.5 and 8k. Then slowly bump up the rev limiter and monitor the knock. If the base raises past 8k then your engine internal are out of balance and you should probably not push it. If the base stays the same or decreases.... crank it up
Think of it like an out of balanced wheel, you know how at different speeds you will have a shimmy and at others all feels good. What you are watching for in the knock reading is the shimmy .
On my motor the knock sensor is super sensitive, my base at 7k is around 25 and it decreases as the rpm's go up to 10 at 9k.
Dan
Think of it like an out of balanced wheel, you know how at different speeds you will have a shimmy and at others all feels good. What you are watching for in the knock reading is the shimmy .
On my motor the knock sensor is super sensitive, my base at 7k is around 25 and it decreases as the rpm's go up to 10 at 9k.
Dan
Excellent advice Dan!
Monitoring knock as a simple and effective way for checking balance of the rotating parts at various rpm. Brilliant!
Jake may have already a problem at lower rpm because of the lightened flywheel - yet with higher frequency harmonics.
Jake, time to get a Datalogit now...
- Sandro
#20
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
statement was partly true on the old 12A's. clould open exhaust and just let rpms increase. However without porting engine had a natural limiter.
Mazda told me not to worry about the engine, just the trans at 8k plus.
As to the FD's ??, I have used an 8500redline for years and yes in auocrossing and sole trials you tend to ride the limiter rather than lose time in a shift.
#21
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (5)
now I'm trying to increase my rev limiter so that I would never hit it . as I've heard horror stories about fuel cutoff rev limiter . I'm not sure if my motor has a stock flywheel it looked stock , but hte motor was rebuild so the PO might have installed one .
is the knock test a good way to try it ? its not about having a longer gear , but knowing how high I can make it so as to not bounce off of it until I get some sort of ignition cutoff system for the rev limiter
is the knock test a good way to try it ? its not about having a longer gear , but knowing how high I can make it so as to not bounce off of it until I get some sort of ignition cutoff system for the rev limiter
#22
RX-7 Bad Ass
iTrader: (55)
In general, rotaries don't mind high revs for short stretches of time. When you get past 8500 or so you get into some weird harmonics from what I remember.
The other biggie is all the stuff you're spinning with the motor - alternator, power steering pump, water pump, etc. I've met a guy with an '89 GTUs who heavily autocrossed it and blew up the power steering pump from staying at high RPM.
Mazdatrix and Racing Beat have some good tech info on high RPM rotaries.
As stated, power will drop off big time at 8000 RPM, but if you're just needing some extra revs to keep from having to shift that's another story.
Dale
The other biggie is all the stuff you're spinning with the motor - alternator, power steering pump, water pump, etc. I've met a guy with an '89 GTUs who heavily autocrossed it and blew up the power steering pump from staying at high RPM.
Mazdatrix and Racing Beat have some good tech info on high RPM rotaries.
As stated, power will drop off big time at 8000 RPM, but if you're just needing some extra revs to keep from having to shift that's another story.
Dale
#23
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (5)
In general, rotaries don't mind high revs for short stretches of time. When you get past 8500 or so you get into some weird harmonics from what I remember.
The other biggie is all the stuff you're spinning with the motor - alternator, power steering pump, water pump, etc. I've met a guy with an '89 GTUs who heavily autocrossed it and blew up the power steering pump from staying at high RPM.
Mazdatrix and Racing Beat have some good tech info on high RPM rotaries.
As stated, power will drop off big time at 8000 RPM, but if you're just needing some extra revs to keep from having to shift that's another story.
Dale
The other biggie is all the stuff you're spinning with the motor - alternator, power steering pump, water pump, etc. I've met a guy with an '89 GTUs who heavily autocrossed it and blew up the power steering pump from staying at high RPM.
Mazdatrix and Racing Beat have some good tech info on high RPM rotaries.
As stated, power will drop off big time at 8000 RPM, but if you're just needing some extra revs to keep from having to shift that's another story.
Dale
I just want to protect my motor by making it rev higher LOL . my target shift will be 8k , but incase I pass that I dont want to be bouncing off the rev limiter . and risk a blow because of something so common as a missed shift point .
Thanks for hte advice I'll try 8500 , and look into those notes
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post