3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Idle vacuum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2015 | 12:44 PM
  #1  
DocHoliday89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 253
Likes: 5
From: Richmond, VA
Idle vacuum

Is it possible to have a condition where you do not have vacuum at idle? What would cause this?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2015 | 05:34 PM
  #2  
Retserof's Avatar
Original Owner
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 87
From: America's Dairyland
Cant imagine how that would occur. Are you sure the vacuum gauge is working correctly and is hooked up correctly?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 07:12 AM
  #3  
DocHoliday89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 253
Likes: 5
From: Richmond, VA
No, I didn't look at the car. I was told this was a condition. I couldn't think of a reason why it would happen so I figured I would put the question out there.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 07:57 AM
  #4  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
There's no way the engine can idle without vacuum as engines are really nothing more than air pumps that go bomb. If the engine is running, it is sucking air so that means it has compression. Check your gauge and the vacuum source.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 08:54 AM
  #5  
DocHoliday89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 253
Likes: 5
From: Richmond, VA
I did not mean to insinuate that I didn't understand how an engine functions. I haven't seen the car face to face. It's not my engine. I was talking with someone and they had this issue. I, however, have not owned a stock FD, or even one that was close to stock. Since I had no experience with the sequential setup and its various vacuum lines, I wondered if it were possible that something could cause a "low" or "no" vacuum reading.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
00SPEC's Avatar
cuz everyone's 99...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
if his idle rpm is high enough to produce extra air at idle, then, yes?
but his question would be 'why is my idle at 2500' in that case

(assuming he is reading vacuum from standard boost gauge position -- upper intake manifold)
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 04:04 PM
  #7  
Vicoor's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 434
Likes: 16
From: Manassas
It is conceivable that there could be no vacuum at idle, timing way retarded, and a big race port or bridge port, and some load on engine, etc.

But it's unlikely that all these conditions would met.

It's much more likely that there is a problem with the way it's being measured.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Vicoor
It's much more likely that there is a problem with the way it's being measured.
i don't know about the FD, but there are some ports on the older cars that do not see vacuum (or boost). in fact the classic rookie mistake with the T2 is to put the fuel pressure regulator hose on the wrong nipple, the correct one sees boost and vacuum, and the other one sees only vacuum.

symptom is it basically not running in boost because its too lean
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
R.O.D
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
Jan 6, 2016 12:09 AM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
localized
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Sep 16, 2015 12:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.