Fuel Temp sensor not needed?
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 4
From: London
Fuel Temp sensor not needed?
with the 1600s kit im getting there's no spot for the fuel temp sensor
is this really worthless? I just like to keep the car as close to the stock setup as possible when modding it...if that makes sense you know what I mean
is this really worthless? I just like to keep the car as close to the stock setup as possible when modding it...if that makes sense you know what I mean
Most ECUs have a default setting if a sensor is offline. It shouldn't be a problem. I borrowed a fuel rail from Garfinkle and he had created a threaded hole for the sensor to mount. When I got my own rail I didn't notice any difference without the fuel sensor.
Cold fuel doesn't atomize as well as warm fuel, but then again you knew that you shouldn't step on the gas all the way when it's cold so that shouldn't play a role...
Any only atomized fuel combusts.... so cold fuel running down the intake port = wastefull... but not hazardous unless you boost 20 psi and the ecu is expecting well atomized fuel.
Any only atomized fuel combusts.... so cold fuel running down the intake port = wastefull... but not hazardous unless you boost 20 psi and the ecu is expecting well atomized fuel.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM



