3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Feeding Premix INTO the OMP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2025 | 05:01 PM
  #1  
vinsil's Avatar
Thread Starter
New to the Club!
 
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Austria
Question Feeding Premix INTO the OMP!

I have a simple question that may require complex answers!

So i was sitting at home pondering about making my new 13b reliable, thinking wether i should do an OMP delete and have to premix 24/7 or keep burning oil from my oil pan getting that nice carbon buildup (also since i didnt even delete my egr yet and my stock twins are going out...)
Thats when i thought, isn't there another solution to this seemingly everlasting dilemma?

An idea popped into my head about keeping the factory OMP installed but instead of injecting that oil that may or may not be synthetic, it would feed of a simple set of lines that would run to a seperate resevoir that inject low amounts of pure roatry premix directly onto those apex seals.
Seemingly this is something that hasnt been done before, hence me asking if this is even possible,
I mean it should be better since the premix would be much purer/thicker since it isnt really 100% mixed with the fuel at time of injection.
It could technically also be better to the carbon deposite since premix is meant to be burned, especially if you use non-Synthetic premix.
but then again i could be doing more harm than good to the longevity of the engine?
Would this be as easy as hooking the resevoir up or would one have to get an entire retune, and mess with the entire OMP system to decrease/increase the amount injected?

I doubt anyone has experience with this but this could potentially be semi groundbreaking for the future of rotaries, or i could just be yapping. XD
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2025 | 05:19 PM
  #2  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 262
From: Around
IT IS A GREAT IDEA, some have gone the home made route and modded the omp but there are also kits available, Sohn Adapter
here: https://www.rotaryaviation.com/store..._Adapters.html
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2025 | 07:10 PM
  #3  
CREEPENJEEPEN's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 528
Likes: 134
From: Florida





It's already been done, and I don't believe anyone has been doing it lately but it might be cool to make it "trending" again.

Source: Street Rotary from Mark Warner, Mechanical Engineer.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2025 | 07:22 PM
  #4  
REnaissance_Sle7in's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 470
Likes: 137
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Yep, something we've been doing here in the states for many many years. I'm not sure why, but the Aussies have always seemed to scoff at the idea. Hence why it may seem like this is a new idea. Add in an ECU with the ability to control the omp, and you have the perfect solution for virtually any driving condition and/or apex seal choice.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2025 | 05:59 AM
  #5  
Pete_89T2's Avatar
Rotorhead for life
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,266
From: Elkton, MD
I've been doing this for years now, since around 2005 on my S5T2 FC, and more recently on my FD. Using the Rotary Aviation / Sohn adapter on both, and a separate pre-mix lube tank plumbed to it. Absolutely love it, as I never have to mess with adding pre-mix to the gas, just need to top off my OMP tank (easy & clean). I typically top off the OMP tank at every fill-up, but I don't need to - tanks are large enough to let me cover roughly 400+ mile trips before I HAVE to top them off.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2025 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
Ryan Rotary Performance also has a version of the Sohn adapter - which appears to be a better option. Not sure if it works on the FD...
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/oil-metering-cof-adapter
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/rrp-clean-oil-feed-system-cofs-complete-kit#tank-colour-l-or-r


Last edited by gracer7-rx7; Aug 1, 2025 at 12:02 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2025 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
Pete_89T2's Avatar
Rotorhead for life
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,266
From: Elkton, MD
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
Ryan Rotary Performance also has a version of the Sohn adapter - which appears to be a better option. Not sure if it works on the FD...
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/oil-metering-cof-adapter
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/rrp-clean-oil-feed-system-cofs-complete-kit#tank-colour-l-or-r
^That's cool, didn't know anyone else besides RA made a version of the Sohn adapter. FWIW, the actual RA Sohn "electronic MOP adapter" that they market for the S5 FCs & FDs will not fit a turbo S5 FC without having to modify the OEM turbo's oil drain plumbing. Same is *probably* true for the FD version - at least it was with my single turbo FD, I had to re-route my oil drain slightly. Not sure how it fits with OEM twins. Basically adding the RA adapter displaces the stock MOP about 1/2 inch outward from the engine, so it will interfere with anything else that's occupying that space.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2025 | 05:31 PM
  #8  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
^^On my S1 RX8, the Sohn adapter displaced it about 3/4-1". No interference on the 8 but it does make the OMP lines touch some hard metal engine parts vs the non-displaced routing so a potential failure point to watch for. I should go back and try to pad that section to decrease the risk of line failure... someday...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2025 | 08:58 PM
  #9  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by vinsil
I have a simple question that may require complex answers!

Cleanly packaging an appropriate size reservoir with the stock twins always seemed like it would be a bit of a hurdle. And you better not let it leak or otherwise run dry. Fitting the adapter with the engine in the car wouldn’t be that fun either. And I bet you’ll still be dealing with some carbon, even with the expensive designer “rotary” premix oils. The Sohn adapter was a clever option, but there are others these days. IMO there is no perfect answer or an absolute right choice. Everything comes with advantages and baggage. The “complex answer” is deciding what will work for your car, its use, its state of modification, your wrenching abilities, and your budget. You owe yourself a little research here on the form before making a choice…


*Functioning OMP
*OMP delete and premix
*Sohn adapter and reservoir
*Functioning OMP with WI
*Functioning OMP and reduced premix with WI

Last edited by Sgtblue; Aug 1, 2025 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2025 | 09:37 AM
  #10  
Pete_89T2's Avatar
Rotorhead for life
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,266
From: Elkton, MD
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
^^On my S1 RX8, the Sohn adapter displaced it about 3/4-1". No interference on the 8 but it does make the OMP lines touch some hard metal engine parts vs the non-displaced routing so a potential failure point to watch for. I should go back and try to pad that section to decrease the risk of line failure... someday...
Now that I'm looking at mine again, you're right - the displacement is more than 1/2 inch, that thing is closer to 1" thick. Never had problems plumbing the RA adapter with the stock OMP lines lines on my FC or FD though, there was enough slack in the lines where I was able to route them without any interference/rubbing issues. I purchased new OEM lines when I did my installs, so the new lines were probably a lot more pliable than an old set of lines with lots of miles on them.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2025 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
notanymore's Avatar
Rotary Evolution
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 445
Likes: 137
From: in the swamp
unfortunately the oil injector placement in the engine still doesn't lubricate the seals all the way across during engine operation, premixing is still the most reliable method of lubricating your side and apex seals.

this is a better alternative to crankcase oil though.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 12:27 AM
  #12  
CREEPENJEEPEN's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 528
Likes: 134
From: Florida
Don't forget when you a deaccelerating, you are no longer utilizing the fuel injector or spraying premix the whole time you are off the throttle; neither is perfect.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 04:53 AM
  #13  
Zepticon's Avatar
OEM+
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 675
From: Norway
how are the newer premixes and cats doing? are they still killing them like i heard they used to?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 06:03 AM
  #14  
RGF's Avatar
RGF
Junior Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 48
Likes: 21
From: Queensland
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
Ryan Rotary Performance also has a version of the Sohn adapter - which appears to be a better option. Not sure if it works on the FD...
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/oil-metering-cof-adapter
https://www.ryanrotaryperformance.com/shop/rrp-clean-oil-feed-system-cofs-complete-kit#tank-colour-l-or-r
Careful, that is an RX8 kit. Rotary Aviation list a different part for the FD.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 11:02 AM
  #15  
notanymore's Avatar
Rotary Evolution
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 445
Likes: 137
From: in the swamp
Originally Posted by CREEPENJEEPEN
Don't forget when you a deaccelerating, you are no longer utilizing the fuel injector or spraying premix the whole time you are off the throttle; neither is perfect.
i've heard this brought up many times, you gotta keep in mind that premix doesn't burn off readily and should still lubricate for a period of deceleration. i've had apart many premixed engines that had minor wear after many many miles.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 09:49 PM
  #16  
CREEPENJEEPEN's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 528
Likes: 134
From: Florida
What if I'm rolling down a big *** mountain in Colorado for 5 minutes straight
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2025 | 10:11 PM
  #17  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
I've heard people claim that the deceleration after a dyno pull might be a long enough time that apex seals can get damaged if there is no premix injected because of decel fuel cutoff. If that's accurate, then coasting down a mountain might be long enough time to do damage. I think I've seen some tuners or builders recommend to disable decel cut on cars that have the OMP disabled and rely on premix.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 09:00 AM
  #18  
notanymore's Avatar
Rotary Evolution
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 445
Likes: 137
From: in the swamp
if someone is claiming an engine was damaged on the dyno due to the fuel cut and premix, they're blaming their own tuning inabilities on anything they can grasp at.

if a person is really that worried, do both, premix and run the OMP. can't go wrong that way. i however would follow this thread and use an external 2 stroke oil injection through the OMP rather than the crankcase oil which actually wears the seals rather than save them, you can see this on 100K+ mile rotor housings by following the wear groove from the oil injection port.

as an aside, at about 75k miles when i was getting ready to do an engine rebuild i ran the car with no premix at all for 2 full tanks of fuel. the engine ran fine with zero apex seal lubrication at all and still made it to 90k miles before eventually losing enough compression to warrant the rebuild. it was already getting rather low at 75k even before i put it through that. doesn't sound like a lot but it's a fair amount on a modded rotary. the rotor housings were still usable with minor reconditioning work, it's not a promotion to do such a thing but i like to experiment.

Last edited by notanymore; Aug 7, 2025 at 09:34 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 11:06 AM
  #19  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by REnaissance_Sle7in
I'm not sure why, but the Aussies have always seemed to scoff at the idea. .
they usually point out that you're allowed to change the oil in the pan...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 08:47 PM
  #20  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
I use an earlier version of https://www.rotaryaviation.com/store..._Adapters.html which uses a large O ring for sealing.
It gets it Idemitsu Premix Oil from a pint container near where the fan relays were located.
Then I also mix 1/2 oz of it with every gallon of gas in the tank.


Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TuRbOnOs7
Microtech
9
Sep 15, 2010 09:12 AM
dr. gonzo
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Oct 10, 2007 10:04 AM
Bison Asko
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
Jan 5, 2007 03:39 PM
rx7man13b
General Rotary Tech Support
1
Jul 15, 2006 11:21 AM
hondahater
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
30
Oct 27, 2004 01:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.