is this an FD?
Trending Topics
I don't have a problem with the front as much as I do the back. Also, putting the strip through the hatch glass would greatly hinder the drivers view don't you think? Not that I would ever pay that kind of money for a bodykit anyway...
-Neal
-Neal
Originally Posted by t-von
I like the kit because it makes the Rx7 look way more exotic. Plus know one knows what it actually is.
About time something decent was done about the headlights, other than using the same old stock housing position.
Originally Posted by t-von
I like the kit because it makes the Rx7 look way more exotic. Plus know one knows what it actually is.
no one knows what the car is usually anyways... Especially when u take of the emblems like i did....
Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
About time something decent was done about the headlights, other than using the same old stock housing position.
Originally Posted by Twinturbo522
no one knows what the car is usually anyways... Especially when u take of the emblems like i did....
Last edited by Montego; Jan 20, 2006 at 11:19 AM.
Originally Posted by California Dreaming
I don't have a problem with the front as much as I do the back. Also, putting the strip through the hatch glass would greatly hinder the drivers view don't you think?
-Neal
-Neal
Originally Posted by California Dreaming
I don't have a problem with the front as much as I do the back. Also, putting the strip through the hatch glass would greatly hinder the drivers view don't you think? Not that I would ever pay that kind of money for a bodykit anyway...
-Neal
-Neal
in my opinion the FD already IS a bodykit without anything added.
I'm still a firm believer in the old 92 FD stock body, I think they are highly original( even still today) and have the most beautiful dstinctive lines of all FDs.
My problem with body kits is that you cannot really f*ck around with too many attatchments to an FD or you risk losing its classic look, or worst yet, you might end up looking like an MR2.
An FD made up to look like an exotic IMO is silly, considering it already looks like an exotic with stock lines and for that reason alone I refuse to bury my car in rice or pasta ( Italian style).
I'm still a firm believer in the old 92 FD stock body, I think they are highly original( even still today) and have the most beautiful dstinctive lines of all FDs.
My problem with body kits is that you cannot really f*ck around with too many attatchments to an FD or you risk losing its classic look, or worst yet, you might end up looking like an MR2.
An FD made up to look like an exotic IMO is silly, considering it already looks like an exotic with stock lines and for that reason alone I refuse to bury my car in rice or pasta ( Italian style).
Originally Posted by t-von
Care to elaborate?
Originally Posted by t-von
If it wasn't on an Rx7, what would you think?
I think it looks good, insane, overdone, and makes the true car completely undistiguishable but still sexy.
As for telling what it is, when i see overdone fd's i usually tell what they are by the location/style of the door handles. very few cars have them in that location.
As for telling what it is, when i see overdone fd's i usually tell what they are by the location/style of the door handles. very few cars have them in that location.



but the kit looks like it takes the Mazda out of the RX7 ...




