3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

DYNO Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 11:48 AM
  #1  
JammerRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
DYNO Results

Done on a dyno pack, 13 psi Primary 14 psi secondary, 93 octane, PFS IC, PFS Intake, PFS DP, PFS CB, PFS PMS, Stock Cat , 39,000 on stock motor, stock twins

1st Run: 313.0 HP @ 6633 RPM
233.6 ft. lbs. @ 6381 RPM

2nd Run : 312.9 HP @ 6722 RPM
233.0 ft. lbs. @ 6415
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #2  
ttb's Avatar
ttb
No Cup Holder Racing
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
nice. i have the same setup except different greddy and apexi. i'll be dynoing it next month, hopefully i can make what you're making, although i'll probably just run 12psi.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 01:31 PM
  #3  
Trout2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 15
From: New Orleans
Sounds good. Do you have a copy of the graph to post? Who did your tuning? What were your A/F ratio's?

Jack
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
T88NosRx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Nice results, you should scream if u got a midpipe.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 02:33 PM
  #5  
JammerRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
wasn't hooked up to a wideband...I'll post the graphs as soon as I get it scanned onto a computer
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
93 R1's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Where did you get it dynoed? Nice numbers
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Those are some nice numbers with a stock cat and stock-ported engine.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 06:43 PM
  #8  
Qball's Avatar
Comp Yellow Mica
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: california
get a midpipe.. i made 333 rwhp on a dynojet with unported engine. at 13 psi secondary.. 99 specs turbos tho.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #9  
ttb's Avatar
ttb
No Cup Holder Racing
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
btw, did you ever dyno it before, when it was stock, curious to see what your stock numbers are on a relatively low mileage motor.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 11:18 PM
  #10  
JammerRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Had it dynoed at my school (Va tech), never dynoed it before, here's the sheet
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #11  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Is that rear wheel or flywheel?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 12:30 AM
  #12  
c00lduke's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
i would assume rear wheel
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 12:33 AM
  #13  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Yeah, I was just looking at the top of the chart though. 313 is pretty darn good through the stock cat on a dynapack!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:40 AM
  #14  
JammerRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
yeah that's rear wheel, I told him to take the RPM's to 7500 and let off if the boost started spikin above 15...I watched the boost the whole time and it sat steady at 14, and when he left off it actually made a little pop like it was runnin rich...wish I'd had a wideband on it
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:44 AM
  #15  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
Maybe it's me, but don't the torque numbers seem a bit low? I'd expect to see at least into the 300's with well over 300 hp.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:18 AM
  #16  
JammerRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Is that final drive number they used off (4.21)? If it is what would be the differences in my numbers? Thanks

James
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #17  
skotx's Avatar
Registered Abuser
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by 911GT2
Maybe it's me, but don't the torque numbers seem a bit low? I'd expect to see at least into the 300's with well over 300 hp.


I only made 285 rwhp and had 265 tq on a Dynojet. Your 233 sounds low.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
userjh5174
Alternative Fuels
1
Jan 9, 2016 08:49 AM
baix2
Power FC Forum
1
Sep 28, 2015 09:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.