3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

AFC Neo or PowerFC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-09, 01:13 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Wringley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AFC Neo or PowerFC?

Hello I know this is a noob question to ask but whats the difference between the AFC Neo and the PowerFC?

I understand that the AFC Neo is a piggyback unit and the PowerFC can be used as a standalone. can i gain the same performance gain with the AFC and the stock ECU as compared to the PowerFC alone?

What do you guys suggest?
Old 03-30-09, 01:41 PM
  #2  
Wangan Nasty

 
Miata_mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine, Southern California
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Power FC > AFC.

Full engine control vs 1/4 *** control. And Yes, a standalone will always offer more control than a piggyback ever could.
Old 03-30-09, 02:08 PM
  #3  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,185
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
Power FC is a great, low cost, easy to install standalone ECU. However, a standalone type ECU like the PFC isn't always necessary. It is nice b/c it is programmable and can be tailored to your setup - IF you have a good tuner that can set it up/tune it appropriately. Many people confuse the act of being able to use a computer with being able to properly and safely tune a map...

You can accomplish similar goals with a piggy back from Pettit, Peter Farrel, M2 or whoever else makes them. Mahjik had posted some good info on a thread some time ago if you want to search for it and get further perspective.
Old 03-30-09, 02:53 PM
  #4  
Wangan Nasty

 
Miata_mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine, Southern California
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^

Piggyback =/= ROM Tune/Reflashed ECU.

Piggyback only adjusts fuel curves without paying attention to anything else that might affect the performance of the engine. A ROM Tune is much safer than a piggyback because it still uses the parameters of the stock ECU but adjusts the program for higher performance.
Old 03-30-09, 03:02 PM
  #5  
Junior Member

 
TimWhiteFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: S.E England
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Afc neo only works by altering the map signal so no good for mapping beyound fuel cut and you can't fo anything about ignition. Save yourself time and hassle in the long run and get a pfc.

I disagree about the piggybacks not being as good as a standalone, for example hks f-con v pro is much better than a pfc.
Old 03-30-09, 03:10 PM
  #6  
Wangan Nasty

 
Miata_mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine, Southern California
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TimWhiteFD
Afc neo only works by altering the map signal so no good for mapping beyound fuel cut and you can't fo anything about ignition. Save yourself time and hassle in the long run and get a pfc.

I disagree about the piggybacks not being as good as a standalone, for example hks f-con v pro is much better than a pfc.
The HKS F-Con V-Pro is a PIGGYBACK STYLE Standalone ECU. Meaning it's a full standalone computer with the ability to run 3 separate maps. However, it does rely on the stock ECU to control auxiliary inputs like the car's interior and such which can offer more flexibility.

HKS's Piggyback is the PFC F-Con or VPC. Their newest standalone is the V Pro 3.3
Old 03-30-09, 03:17 PM
  #7  
Junior Member

 
TimWhiteFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: S.E England
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"PIGGYBACK STYLE" i think a hooker offered me that the other night.

At the end of the day piggyback is piggyback ie the stock ecu is still being used for something in the car. You can get high resolution maps on piggy backs i think emu has higher resloution than a pfc just a matter of what the manufature has decided to include as a feature.
Old 03-30-09, 03:46 PM
  #8  
Finally Knows

iTrader: (21)
 
WaachBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hands down PFC.
Old 03-30-09, 05:38 PM
  #9  
500+hp club

iTrader: (26)
 
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
a neo only allows you to adjust fuel thats it. the power fc allows you to control everything like timing fuel fans boost extra eccesories like alky injection the power fc can and will allow you to make more power out of even a stock motor as the stock ecu has all its presets set at a safe zone as the power fc you can tune the engine and go further than the safe zone unlike the stock ecu. the neo really is not going to do squat as you can always give and take away fuel but you also have to put timing into consideration aso and your not going to get that from a neo
Old 03-30-09, 06:57 PM
  #10  
Please somebody help!!!

iTrader: (1)
 
NissanConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverfdturbo6port
a neo only allows you to adjust fuel thats it. the power fc allows you to control everything like timing fuel fans boost extra eccesories like alky injection the power fc can...
How is your PFC driving alky?

PFC > AFC, in case it wasn't already decided.
Old 03-31-09, 01:27 AM
  #11  
500+hp club

iTrader: (26)
 
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i was just using that a a example as a an auxilery output not sure if a power fc has one tho i will be finding out soon tho i am use to full standalones lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sukimoto
Rotary Car Performance
3
10-26-15 02:37 PM



Quick Reply: AFC Neo or PowerFC?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.