3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

3rd Gen Subframe connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2007 | 11:21 PM
  #1  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
3rd Gen Subframe connectors

check it out TSR's chromoly subframe connectors for the 3rd gen rex


http://www.torquecentral.com/showthread.php?t=40674
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:37 AM
  #2  
wanklin's Avatar
Rob
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 1
From: Northern Virginia
Nice find.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #3  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Looks like another useless aftermarket part. The FD chassis is already extremely stiff.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #4  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by DamonB
Looks like another useless aftermarket part. The FD chassis is already extremely stiff.
I'm with DamonB...let's add weight!!! and talk about nightmare if you have to drop either subframe...

it might be a good buy on a f-body...but the FD
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #5  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
lol ... drop the subframe........the connectors weld on to the frame rails. The frame rails dont unbolt from the car. The connectors will never have to come off theres nothing you would be blocked from getting to, anyway the rx7 is a unibody of sort and there are parts made in japan that connect the chassis that cost over $750 it just depends on if you push the car to feel the difference. this is just another way of doing it for alot less. also keep in mine a roll cage adds alot of weight and greatly stiffens up the chassis of the car. just think about it.

thanks Jerad
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #6  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
If my car had as much rust in it as the one in those pics I might need more chassis reinforement as well
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #7  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
there are parts made in japan that connect the chassis that cost over $750
...and those parts are actually somewhat useful for a raced FD chassis because they actually reinforce suspension pickup points which these tubes do not.

Originally Posted by moralesrx7
just think about it.
I did and structurally those are nearly useless. They merely tie one of the stoutest parts of the body to one of the other stoutest parts of the body. I'm sure somebody will polish or powdercoat a set and declare them the best thing since sliced bread though.

Last edited by DamonB; Jan 26, 2007 at 02:05 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #8  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 368
From: Bath, OH


They'd make a good place to jack the car up ... and act like skid plates for off-roading...

Dave
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #9  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
sorry the car has so much rust..lol but thanks
now the parts from japan DO NOT Tie in the the suspension points and please do some research i can see you have never seen a subframe connector installed like i said please look it up none of them tie in the suspension points thats not the point the point is to tie the strongest point in the front to the strongest in the back if you think im wrong look up pictures of any sub connector in a f-body, mustang, or any unibody car. can you even show me a part made in japan for any of there supercars doing what u said (i dont men side to side but front to back). for those of you who dont think this will help thats fine, but most of you with a scca/ drag background will agree these will help.

Last edited by moralesrx7; Jan 26, 2007 at 02:36 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #10  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
tubes hang a total of 1" below the pinch welds... nothing wrong with dual purpose parts (jack points) because you know the floor is so strong and the chassis is so stiff that you can place a jack anywhere under the car....who wouldn't want a better jack point and stiffer chassis on these cars for a whole 17lbs

Last edited by moralesrx7; Jan 26, 2007 at 02:39 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #11  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
please do some research i can see you have never seen a subframe connector installed
I've been underneath quite a few Camaros and Mustangs with subframe connectors. Unfortunately the way that part is made isn't of any real benefit to the FD. Should the Camaros and Mustangs install aluminum AST's?


Originally Posted by moralesrx7
but most of you with a scca/ drag background will agree these will help.
I've got one. DaveW even more so. Others in this thread may as well but I don't know that off the top of my head.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #12  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
Originally Posted by DamonB
I've been underneath quite a few Camaros and Mustangs with subframe connectors. Unfortunately the way that part is made isn't of any real benefit to the FD. Should the Camaros and Mustangs install aluminum AST's?




I've got one. So Does DaveW. Others in this thread may as well but I don't know that off the top of my head.

The only reason you have your underwear in a wad is because you're trying to sell these parts.
so do the camaros and mustangs tie in the susp.? like u said
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #13  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
also keep in [mind] a roll cage adds alot of weight and greatly stiffens up the chassis of the car...
...and protects the occupants.

There's a big difference between trading some extra weight in return for the benefits of a roll cage and adding rails beneath the car whose only benefit would be for grinding down sidewalks and railings with the skateboarders.

most of you with a scca/ drag background will agree these will help.
Damon has an SCCA background, and I have a drag racing background and neither of us thinks this mod is worth the effort. Anyone truly serious about drag racing would back-half the car or build a full tube frame car anyway.

who would want a better jack point on these cars.
There are already excellent jack points on the cars... the front and rear subframes.

Are you looking to sell these, or is there some other reason why you'd be so concerned that people don't see them as necessary?
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #14  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
The Camaro and Mustang connectors reinforce a floppy chassis. The FD chassis is not a floppy structure, especially compared to a Mustang or Camaro.

Last edited by DamonB; Jan 26, 2007 at 02:51 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #15  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
please show me how these are so much different these also these are made from mild steel
Attached Thumbnails 3rd Gen Subframe connectors-subframe_connector_0205.jpg   3rd Gen Subframe connectors-06tubestang.jpg  
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #16  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by jimlab
Are you looking to sell these, or is there some other reason why you'd be so concerned that people don't see them as necessary?
He is either selling them or has already bought a set and is disappointed we don't like them
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #17  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
please show me how these are so much different these also these are made from mild steel
The most obvious thing I see is that those are not attached to an FD.

Here's a nugget for you: Just because it pays dividends on one car doesn't mean it does the same for another.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #18  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
Originally Posted by jimlab
...and protects the occupants.

There's a big difference between trading some extra weight in return for the benefits of a roll cage and adding rails beneath the car whose only benefit would be for grinding down sidewalks and railings with the skateboarders.

Damon has an SCCA background, and I have a drag racing background and neither of us thinks this mod is worth the effort. Anyone truly serious about drag racing would back-half the car or build a full tube frame car anyway.

There are already excellent jack points on the cars... the front and rear subframes.

Are you looking to sell these, or is there some other reason why you'd be so concerned that people don't see them as necessary?
im selling these but be sides that im not concerned about people thinking they necessary there not but to say that that wont help and are useless in the autox world or drag racing is just stupid. and mine is a back-half car
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #19  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
im selling these
Obviously. Well, sell them to the dummies on Torque Central. They'll show a lot of interest, but unfortunately most of them don't have any money.

to say that that wont help and are useless in the autox world or drag racing is just stupid
Do you have any hard data to back that up?

and mine is a back-half car
Good for you.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #20  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by DamonB
Here's a nugget for you: Just because it pays dividends on one car doesn't mean it does the same for another.
Not to mention the fact that he doesn't even have them installed on his own car yet, so he has no idea what benefit, if any, they provide.

This is as stupid as using a torque arm on an IRS car. Granny's and Hinson did it because the cars the drivetrains come from have them, but they didn't stop to consider that those cars also have live rear axles and therefore need them.

The rigidity of unibody construction has come a long way since the 1960s... at least for manufacturers other than Ford and GM. The FD doesn't need a longitudinal bracing system.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #21  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
Originally Posted by jimlab

Do you have any hard data to back that up?
do you have any to say they wont? you know jim being you seem to know alot get off it. you know as well as anyone that these would help to stiffen the frame and yes a fbody to a stang to a 300z to a fd are going to be different but that doesnt mean that all wont benfit to a larger sway-bar, tb, stronger driveshaft, roll cage, and so on the point stays the same, these bars tie the subframe together not the susp. and bening your buddy knows alot to scca and you know drag would you agree that subframe connectors bolt/weld to the susp. points?
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #22  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
sorry i dont have them installed, my bad... good point
we'll also making a trans cross member and lsx tubular choromly subframe to but hey what do we know.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #23  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
do you have any to say they wont?
Yes. 15+ years of the FD being incredibly competitive in SCCA and drag racing without them.

you know jim being you seem to know alot get off it. you know as well as anyone that these would help to stiffen the frame
Bullshit. Just extra weight for extremely minimal benefit.

and yes a fbody to a stang to a 300z to a fd are going to be different but that doesnt mean that all wont benfit to a larger sway-bar, tb, stronger driveshaft, roll cage
All modifications that provide some tangible benefit to handling, performance, or strength... do your bars provide that?

That crackling you hear is fire... jump out and pull the cord on your chute. You're all done here.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #24  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
we'll also making a trans cross member and lsx tubular choromly subframe to but hey what do we know.
How to recreate parts that others have already made, apparently.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #25  
moralesrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: clarkston MI
open challenge
to any one who have a fd that is autox 60% of time that can drive or any fd drag car runing low 10s ill ship them a pair for cost including u jim if you have a running car (im sure you do) to test and write a review

Last edited by moralesrx7; Jan 26, 2007 at 03:22 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.