3rd Gen Subframe connectors
#26
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we dont have a lsx subframe to copy anyway where not using any stock parts show me who else is doing that.....to quote you just extra weight for extremely minimal benefit. in your mind theres still a benefit. even if you think is small, and 15+ years running with out them doesnt prove they wont help just that you didnt try them or think of making them. you still didnt answer my question (these bars tie the subframe together not the susp. and being your buddy knows alot to scca and you know drag would you agree with him that subframe connectors bolt/weld to the susp. points?)
#27
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
any fd drag car runing low 10s
#29
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
show me who [else] is doing that...
All I see from you is a lot of talk and theory. Let me know when you have your parts installed and some data to prove that there's actually a benefit.
in your mind theres still a benefit.
#30
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jim who said that subframe connectors increase performance down the track, where not talking susp. here THESE ARE MADE TO STIFFEN UP THE CHASSIS. they might show improvement when taking off but that it.
#32
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
open challenge
to any one who have a fd that is autox 60% of time
to any one who have a fd that is autox 60% of time
#33
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heres a bit of text from a hot rod
* The connectors are hollow but very rigid which reduces weight while giving the same performance benefit.
* Stiffens up the chassis for a better all around performance machine. Great for that visit to the track, or even for spirited street drivers, which all of us are from time to time.
* Optional jacking rails provide several places under the car to jack for faster & easier
* Extra stability added to the lower portion of the sides of the car in case of a side impact crash. Adding rigidity to the frame of the car is always a safety benefit as well as a performance one. We recently witnessed a dragstrip accident involving 2 fox body Mustangs where the nose of one car plowed straight into the passenger side of the other car. The one that received the hit, showed extensive damage to the lower passenger door that could have been lessened with a subframe setup.
* The connectors are hollow but very rigid which reduces weight while giving the same performance benefit.
* Stiffens up the chassis for a better all around performance machine. Great for that visit to the track, or even for spirited street drivers, which all of us are from time to time.
* Optional jacking rails provide several places under the car to jack for faster & easier
* Extra stability added to the lower portion of the sides of the car in case of a side impact crash. Adding rigidity to the frame of the car is always a safety benefit as well as a performance one. We recently witnessed a dragstrip accident involving 2 fox body Mustangs where the nose of one car plowed straight into the passenger side of the other car. The one that received the hit, showed extensive damage to the lower passenger door that could have been lessened with a subframe setup.
#36
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dont have to race legal i just want a review on if you noticed a improvement from the useless product as you call it ( i wonder why they not legal if there useless hmmmm? oh wait does that just apply to the classes you mentioned why cant all class use them...just wondering)
#38
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Well you said "check these out" and two veteran forum members did just that.
As for me, I agree that those things aren't worth their weight. Not even close. Yes, a stiffer frame helps handling, in general. Your bar will only help (I'm being generous using the word 'help') stiffen along the length of the car. So how many FDs do you see sagging between the wheels like a ribby old horse? Those bars would not help one iota in controlling chassis twist or camber change.
I would not install these on my car, even for free. I'm a beginning SCCA autox participant, and even I know that's not how to modify my car.
I know some FD owners collect toys for their cars where the idea of a new piece to buy and install and show off is more important than the value or the function. It will appeal to that crowd. It probably is frustrating to spend all that time and money building something nice and finding out the idea is not technically useful, but that's life. Perhaps you should follow the tornado intake marketing model if you need guidance.
Dave
As for me, I agree that those things aren't worth their weight. Not even close. Yes, a stiffer frame helps handling, in general. Your bar will only help (I'm being generous using the word 'help') stiffen along the length of the car. So how many FDs do you see sagging between the wheels like a ribby old horse? Those bars would not help one iota in controlling chassis twist or camber change.
I would not install these on my car, even for free. I'm a beginning SCCA autox participant, and even I know that's not how to modify my car.
I know some FD owners collect toys for their cars where the idea of a new piece to buy and install and show off is more important than the value or the function. It will appeal to that crowd. It probably is frustrating to spend all that time and money building something nice and finding out the idea is not technically useful, but that's life. Perhaps you should follow the tornado intake marketing model if you need guidance.
Dave
Last edited by dgeesaman; 01-26-07 at 05:53 PM.
#40
development
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
dont have to race legal i just want a review on if you noticed a improvement from the useless product as you call it ( i wonder why they not legal if there useless hmmmm? oh wait does that just apply to the classes you mentioned why cant all class use them...just wondering)
But DamonB please feel free to waste some money, weld 17lbs to your car, disqualifying it, run time only...and give us a review.
#41
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah sorry for the grammer.......as far as not helping check the chassis cert for running faster then 9.99 (must have sill bars or subframe connectors on all cars go figure) scca subframe bars are legal solo II Street Modified and Prepared classes as long as bars do not connect to each other (ie cross bars). thanks dubulup you made me see the light. lol
#42
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Well you said "check these out" and two veteran forum members did just that.
As for me, I agree that those things aren't worth their weight. Not even close. Yes, a stiffer frame helps handling, in general. Your bar will only help (I'm being generous using the word 'help') stiffen along the length of the car. So how many FDs do you see sagging between the wheels like a ribby old horse? Those bars would not help one iota in controlling chassis twist or camber change.
Dave
As for me, I agree that those things aren't worth their weight. Not even close. Yes, a stiffer frame helps handling, in general. Your bar will only help (I'm being generous using the word 'help') stiffen along the length of the car. So how many FDs do you see sagging between the wheels like a ribby old horse? Those bars would not help one iota in controlling chassis twist or camber change.
Dave
#43
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
dont have to race legal i just want a review on if you noticed a improvement from the useless product as you call it ( i wonder why they not legal if there useless hmmmm? oh wait does that just apply to the classes you mentioned why cant all classes use them...just wondering not being smart)
#46
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
check the chassis cert for running faster then 9.99 (must have sill bars or subframe connectors on all cars go figure)
youve got alot to learn about sub frame connectors please see the pics posted one page back at the bottom of 2 non fd cars, one is 06 gt go tell them that.
Keeping in mind that almost everybody that is running unibody cars in the drag world use them...
#47
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
Maybe you should ask Ari Yallon and others how they've had their FDs NHRA certified for quicker than 9.99 without subframe connectors. (hint: full cage)
Once again, you're talking about something that only applies to certain cars. Not the FD. Do you see a recurring theme here?
No, they don't.
Once again, you're talking about something that only applies to certain cars. Not the FD. Do you see a recurring theme here?
No, they don't.
and yes i do see that im comparing cars point still stands subframe connectors on any unibody car WILL stiffen up the frame is it worth the 17lbs that up to the person, but 17lbs at the lowest part of the car is nothing in a time attack event (more weight lower to the ground doesnt seem bad imo) where human error is going to cause slower times then 17lbs and in a drag event
ie....... 2700lb car with 250hp will do 13.651 @ 104.65mph
and a 2717lb car with 250hp will do 13.673 @ 104.45mph
wow that 17lbs had a 0.022 second and 0.2 mph change......that right there gives an idea on how some people on this board worry way to much about 17lbs for no reason because they dont know any better.
Last edited by moralesrx7; 01-26-07 at 09:09 PM.
#48
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: clarkston MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and yes 70% of unibody cars running 10.00-12.50 do use them because most have a 6 pt cage also keep in mind there are alot more cars in that range then in the 7-9.99 range in which they do have fully cages with sill bars and/or subframe connectors
#49
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
and yes 70% of unibody cars
running 10.00-12.50 do use them because most have a 6 pt cage
A roll bar is required in any convertible running 13.99 seconds or quicker in the quarter mile, and in other cars beginning at 11.99. The roll bar is accepted in vehicles running as quick as 10.00 second e.t., provided the stock firewall and floorboard is intact, other than for installation of wheel tubs. The rollbar must be constructed of minimum 1 ¾ inch o.d. x .118 inch wall mild steel tubing, or 1 ¾ x .083 chrome moly tubing, and must conform to the following diagram:
http://www.nhra.com/contacts/tech_faq.html
http://www.nhra.com/contacts/tech_faq.html
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
also keep in mind there are alot more cars in that range
Just shut the **** up.
#50
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by moralesrx7
scca subframe bars are legal solo II Street Modified and Prepared classes as long as bars do not connect to each other (ie cross bars).
For a convertible or old style hot rod, i'm sure there is plenty to be gained this way. There is one FD convertible conversion out there on this board, you should contact him. But that's it.
But not really much to gain on an FD. Go tube frame or racing cage, or leave it as is. That's how I see it in terms of performance options.
Dave