3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

1991 fd?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-15, 07:24 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ngirondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1991 fd?!

Can someone please help me out here? I'm in Japan and i found this 1991 FD, i thought they only produced the FD starting in 92? Is this just a typeo?

Mazda RX-7 type RB S package for sale
Old 10-07-15, 08:25 AM
  #2  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
As far as I'm aware 1991 was the final year of the FC (I don't think I've ever seen a 1992 FC). 1992 was a transition year, 1993 was the first year of the FD.

I think people will refer to "1992 FDs" because the vehicles were physically built in 1992, though they are technically 1993 model year vehicles (much like you'll find 2016 model cars out on lots now, even though it's only 2015).
Old 10-07-15, 09:04 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by fendamonky
As far as I'm aware 1991 was the final year of the FC (I don't think I've ever seen a 1992 FC). 1992 was a transition year, 1993 was the first year of the FD.

I think people will refer to "1992 FDs" because the vehicles were physically built in 1992, though they are technically 1993 model year vehicles (much like you'll find 2016 model cars out on lots now, even though it's only 2015).
Very true. Although, in this particular case, I would lean more toward it being a typo, due to the passenger airbag. I'm pretty sure no Mazda's anywhere had passenger side airbags in 1991. Now, obviously the owner could have swapped the dash, but I'm just saying...
Old 10-07-15, 09:19 AM
  #4  
OMG a Chupacabra!

iTrader: (26)
 
Broke_A_Baller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,359
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by fendamonky
As far as I'm aware 1991 was the final year of the FC (I don't think I've ever seen a 1992 FC). 1992 was a transition year, 1993 was the first year of the FD. I think people will refer to "1992 FDs" because the vehicles were physically built in 1992, though they are technically 1993 model year vehicles (much like you'll find 2016 model cars out on lots now, even though it's only 2015).
I think that's accurate for the US, but in Japan they do have 1992 FD3S from what I remember.
Old 10-07-15, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Most likely a 2001 FD.
Old 10-07-15, 11:20 AM
  #6  
It Just Feels Right

iTrader: (11)
 
TomU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,238
Received 347 Likes on 258 Posts
looks like it's got some nice parts
Old 10-07-15, 11:38 AM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,849
Received 2,613 Likes on 1,852 Posts
Mazda started production for the Japanese market 10/91, and the US market 12/28/91. most of the world refers to a car by its build date, but in the US we have a thing called a model year. so the 12/91-6/92 US model FD's are 1993 model year cars, even though they weren't made in 1993. they do meet safety and emissions requirements FOR 1993 though
Old 10-07-15, 06:05 PM
  #8  
half ass 2 or whole ass 1

iTrader: (114)
 
cr-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: okinawa to tampa
Posts: 3,425
Received 481 Likes on 350 Posts
yes, you are correct. in japan there are 1991 FDs and 1993 FCs. at some point, both the FC and FD were being produced at the same time.
Old 10-07-15, 07:38 PM
  #9  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
^All correct with regards to production dates. However, the car in the ad in particular is either a 2001 car or someone did a LOT of work updating the car. New badges on the rear, passenger airbag, 99+ instrument cluster, 96+ y-pipe, etc.

The car itself looks like a 1999-2002 car.

Dale
Old 10-07-15, 08:52 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ngirondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaleClark
^All correct with regards to production dates. However, the car in the ad in particular is either a 2001 car or someone did a LOT of work updating the car. New badges on the rear, passenger airbag, 99+ instrument cluster, 96+ y-pipe, etc.

The car itself looks like a 1999-2002 car.

Dale
Awesome info guys thank you I knew the 92s are a thing here because I own one just trying to figure this one out and if it turns out to be a true 91 it'll be coming back to the states 2016
Old 10-07-15, 11:15 PM
  #11  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,849
Received 2,613 Likes on 1,852 Posts
if you get the vin we can tell what series it is.
Old 10-09-15, 07:38 PM
  #12  
endless build

iTrader: (15)
 
7krayziboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Canada , Alberta
Posts: 1,139
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
I confirm ,91 FD3S exist , I'm in the 900 first made and I'm born January 6 1992
Old 10-10-15, 07:29 AM
  #13  
10-8-10-8

 
SA3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I think people will refer to "1992 FDs" because the vehicles were physically built in 1992, though they are technically 1993 model year vehicles (much like you'll find 2016 model cars out on lots now, even though it's only 2015).
That is completely incorrect.

My Dad owns a 1991 built & plated FD (JDM RHD).
I also own a 1992 built & plated FD (JDM RHD Auto.)

The first FD in Japan was manufactured & sold in 1991. Manufacturing of the FD3S started in 1991 and continued through 1992, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000, 2001, and ended in 2002.

At one point, Mazda Japan was manufacturing new FD and FC cars at the same time as production overlapped. FC ran from 1985 to 1991. So FD and FC were being manufactured at the same point in time in 1991.

Its difficult to explain this to people living outside Japan or Australia, as we saw the whole FD model run from 1991 to 2002, whereas the US only had a few short years, but that is not reflective of the model run in the rest of the world.
Old 10-10-15, 07:36 AM
  #14  
10-8-10-8

 
SA3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
And that Type-RB S you originally linked in the OP, would be a 2001 with a typo. I agree with Dale. Far too much modern stuff on it, and Type RB S prevailed mostly in the 2000+ years.

Not many people would retrofit as many fiddly things on that car as it has, if it were a true 1991. Too much work. Occam's Razor says its more likely a typo! :p
Old 10-10-15, 11:30 AM
  #15  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,849
Received 2,613 Likes on 1,852 Posts
Originally Posted by SA3R
That is completely incorrect.

My Dad owns a 1991 built & plated FD (JDM RHD).
I also own a 1992 built & plated FD (JDM RHD Auto.)

The first FD in Japan was manufactured & sold in 1991. Manufacturing of the FD3S started in 1991 and continued through 1992, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000, 2001, and ended in 2002.

At one point, Mazda Japan was manufacturing new FD and FC cars at the same time as production overlapped. FC ran from 1985 to 1991. So FD and FC were being manufactured at the same point in time in 1991.

Its difficult to explain this to people living outside Japan or Australia, as we saw the whole FD model run from 1991 to 2002, whereas the US only had a few short years, but that is not reflective of the model run in the rest of the world.
you're correct, but in the USA we have weird rules, because we're completely bonkers.

in the USA we have this concept of a model year, it is for safety and emissions standards, and traditionally it follows the new model introductions, so the 2016 model year cars should be at or soon to arrive at the dealerships, even though its 2015.

in the case of the FD, ALL of our 1993 model year cars were built between 12/28/1991, which is 2 months after the Japanese market start, and about 6/92. i don't recall exactly, but they would have shown up about April/May of 1992 as 1993 models. so none of the 1993 model year FD's were actually built in the calendar year of 1993.

at the other end, the 1995 models were actually made right up until December of 1995, which is about 4 months longer than usual, and there were some hanging around in dealer lots up to 1998, because they couldn't give the things away.

so the FD was actually here from 92-96, but we only got the 93/94/95 model years. its kind of why there are no 1985 trucks (1986 models showed up in 1985), or no 1998 miata's (we got the NB as a 1999 model, in 1998), or the ND miata, which is a 2016 model...

the above is factually correct, but if it makes any logical sense to you, you should come over here and run for president.
Old 10-10-15, 03:21 PM
  #16  
Rotary Freak

 
billyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,536
Received 261 Likes on 199 Posts
Appears to be a climate control car, if it works, too many knick-knacks to retrofit to a late car and get it all to cooperate. Fitting some late dash, cluster and cosmetic detail on the other hand is fairly trivial, so more than likely an early car....would be an ideal car for dodgy local mate in Granville to clock and misrepresent!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
musker
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
28
12-03-15 11:18 AM



Quick Reply: 1991 fd?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.