3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

1,500 miles on my LS1 powered '93 RX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2002 | 10:59 PM
  #176  
nrolfes1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 156
Likes: 1
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Originally posted by artguy


anyhow...point being that this kind of a vehicle is UNTESTED and UNPROVEN. The reviews about it are coming from the builders and not actual customers right?

along this line of thought i didn't see anywhere in the content list contingencies for upgrading the driveshafts and frame.

you must have some pretty serious upgrades to these components assumed if you are doubling the torque going down the output shaft. my guess is the halfshafts, ppf, driveshafts, rear diff would all need to be upgraded. bigger brakes and new bushings, maybe some upgraded suspension parts, it seems like the whole chassis would need to be upgraded once you get too far above stock. basically the same issues you run into with the 13b once you get into those high power numbers. i think these items will fall into the "test and tune" artguy was talking about above and ultimately you might end up with the entire chassis of a corvette to go along with the engine.

these would be my concerns as a potential customer and i would be interested to know what your workarounds for these issues are, unless of course thats all proprietary
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 12:58 AM
  #177  
V8 Lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: HinsonSuperCars.com
Originally posted by artguy
[B]the etraylor post above reminds me of the movie reviews Sony did of their own movies a couple years ago...trying to pass them off for real reviews. this kind of a vehicle is UNTESTED and UNPROVEN. The reviews about it are coming from the builders and not actual customers right?
LOL You are correct that the only people who have actually experienced the car are people involved in the conversion. Everyone is welcome anytime to come by the shop to check out the progress and go for a ride. Connections have already been made for one board member who has posted in this thread to stop by on his way through Alabama for Christmas vacation.

When we see this car performing as long as the builders are promising then we will believe you. when it is on the track doing what people are hoping it will do then I will believe you.
Very understandable comment. Track tests are currently being scheduled so that we can show the true performance level of the car. Videos will be posted for all who cannot be there in person.

I imagine you guys doing this full conversion will run into the same kinds of difficulties....headaches...frusterations....and elations.
There will be some headaches with the initial car over time. As much as I would like to think we're perfect, there is always room for a little good 'ol fashion human error. This is the reason we are trying to test as much as possible prior to selling parts in order to eliminate problems for the do-it-yourselfer. There is currently over 1,800 miles on the car without a single problem.

however... I will search out this thread NEXT YEAR to see how your 20 thousand dollar+ investments have come out. I wish you luck...
Thanks. I am going to try to keep this board up to date with the progress of the car over time.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:02 AM
  #178  
V8 Lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: HinsonSuperCars.com
Originally posted by nrolfes1
given the advances in emissions technology in the last ten years its no surprise that it has better fuel economy. but i think the renesis will "catch the rotary up" to the current state of piston advancement that the 13B has fallen behind over the last 10 years.
The Renesis will definitely bring the rotary design back in to the ball game in fuel effeciency, but we need to keep things in perspective. The new RX8 should be a fun car like a Nissan Maxima. It won't have the gearing or agility of its 10yo brother the RX7.

this led me to conclude that if the 13b were redesigned today it would be considerably lighter due to the advancement in engine bay plastics, etc.
This could very well be true, but I feel we will never see the reality of this dream. It appears as if Mazda has moved on from the 13B design with no public discussion of bringing it back in the current or all-new form.

which leads me to my second point: the renesis. from what i have seen of the renesis it has the plastic intake and the much lighter engine componentry, as well as the lack of turbos and air pump etc. this engine will be considerably lower in weight while retaining the power of the 13brew which means if you were to swap one into a fd the results would be very interesting.
It would be interesting to see someone make the conversion. Stock for stock, it would be an increased power range. I'm sure someone would find a way to increase power output even more with a turbo application possibly turning to a new page in rotary RX7 performance.

but that brings me to my 3rd point which is the v8 swap simply turns the RX7 from a sports car into a muscle car, simple as that. the goals are very different in creating a sports car vs. a muscle car
The lines between sports car, muscle car, and dare I say "High performance car" are very grey. The goal for this conversion was to build a car that maintained performance levels equal to or higher than a '02 Z06. If those performance levels fall in to a "muscle car" description for you, then it is by all means it is a muscle car.

i just would hate to see the day when v8 engine swaps become so popular that Mazda (Ford) decides theres really no point in releasing an engine that people just swap out, so they just give the 7 a v8 to start with and alas we end up with another mustang on our hands.
I don't think you have anything to worry about. I highly doubt Mazda(Ford) is watching this thread in hopes of developing the next domestic Viper.

oh and as for reliability once you dump that turbo i think the renesis will be just as reliable as any v8, the rotary is actually quite reliable if you give it a chance, i'm pushing 140K on a 1979 RX7 original engine N/A
I believe you're starting to compare apples and oranges here.

Last edited by V8 Lover; Dec 11, 2002 at 01:13 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:23 AM
  #179  
V8 Lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: HinsonSuperCars.com
Originally posted by nrolfes1
along this line of thought i didn't see anywhere in the content list contingencies for upgrading the driveshafts and frame.
these would be my concerns as a potential customer and i would be interested to know what your workarounds for these issues are, unless of course thats all proprietary
These issues have been considered and addressed in the strength of the parts that we offer for the conversion.
The rear suspension components will be upgraded on a need basis. In other words, we're testing the limits of stock parts in order to better serve our customers with tested results. If we find they need to be upgraded, they will be will done in the order that they break. However, all of these parts will be more than strong enough for the average Joe who daily drives the car with the ocassional street race or excited run down an on-ramp. Most people aren't going to be bolting slicks on the car and streaking down the strip every weekend, but we will be providing tech support for those who wish to do this.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:59 AM
  #180  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Allentown, PA
I still can't get used to seeing an FD with the LS1 rumble! I hope you can break everything in, and get some more vids up soon!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 08:23 AM
  #181  
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
ok, so.... any fast car is great..... and I commend you for successfully doing the swap and making it run.

but you do realize that you are going straight to hell

If you want a muscle car... go buy a muscle car and leave the rex ALONE. If you can't handle the complications of a rotary then you have no business with the car.

At the least go for a tuned NA 3 rotor. You'd be surprised what you can get and they will sound like race cars not smokey and the bandit.....

a v8 swap just completely negates the entire point of the RX-7's existence in my opinion. It is sacrilege. If I ever win a billion dollars I will make it my mission to pay top dollar for every 3rd gen I can get my hands on and store them in a warehouse so noone can wreck them or generally do dumbass **** to them.... my 2 cents
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 10:27 AM
  #182  
Brad's Avatar
dear baby jesus...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: WA
Originally posted by xurotaryrocket
ok, so.... any fast car is great..... and I commend you for successfully doing the swap and making it run.

but you do realize that you are going straight to hell

If you want a muscle car... go buy a muscle car and leave the rex ALONE. If you can't handle the complications of a rotary then you have no business with the car.

At the least go for a tuned NA 3 rotor. You'd be surprised what you can get and they will sound like race cars not smokey and the bandit.....

a v8 swap just completely negates the entire point of the RX-7's existence in my opinion. It is sacrilege. If I ever win a billion dollars I will make it my mission to pay top dollar for every 3rd gen I can get my hands on and store them in a warehouse so noone can wreck them or generally do dumbass **** to them.... my 2 cents
You are so right. Kinda like when Carroll Shelby put that big *** V8 in that little British sports car.

What a stupid ******* idea.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #183  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
The last few posts make me LOL.

Wow.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 10:57 AM
  #184  
paw140's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: Hattiesburg, MS
If I ever win a billion dollars I will make it my mission to pay top dollar for every 3rd gen I can get my hands on and store them in a warehouse so noone can wreck them or generally do dumbass **** to them
If I had a billion dollars, I would buy all the 3rd gens and send them to the crusher, so the sacrilege will end! Then no one could disgrace a 3rd gen by putting a v8 in it!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 12:16 PM
  #185  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
How much engine hp does a bone stock LS1 have? If someone goes a buys a new or used STOCK LS1 how much hp we talking?

I thought they were rated at 320 at the engine?

Am I wrong about this? Does the conversion add bolt on mods like intake and full exhaust or is all that extra just like it would be to mod a rx7?

I heavent heard much about the hp, I assume since the engine is up to the customer the cost that have been associated with this project so far would be based on a bone stock LS1 with 320hp at the engine and then the price would go up from there.

Am I wrong about this???

STEPHEN
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:05 PM
  #186  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
Stephen, Yes - you are wrong.

The earliest STOCK LS1's were rated at 345 HP. Also worth noting - they were generally underrated around 5%.

The HP goes up a little Each year, with 1 or 2 years being an exception. Of course, the '01 LS6 is rated at 385 and the '02 LS6 is rated at 405.

Hope that clears things up.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:09 PM
  #187  
V8 Lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: HinsonSuperCars.com
Originally posted by SPOautos
How much engine hp does a bone stock LS1 have? If someone goes a buys a new or used STOCK LS1 how much hp we talking?
The '01 and '02 model LS1 engines in a Camaro or Firebird are averaging over 320rwhp on the dyno without any modifications.

I thought they were rated at 320 at the engine?
The are underrated from GM.

Does the conversion add bolt on mods like intake and full exhaust or is all that extra just like it would be to mod a rx7?
The full price conversion do duplicate the first car includes the LS6 intake which is a nice addition to the LS1. All turn key cars will have a custom true dual exhaust with H-pipe and hi-flow mufflers. The car in the video clip didn't have mufflers or a H-pipe at the time.

I heavent heard much about the hp, I assume since the engine is up to the customer the cost that have been associated with this project so far would be based on a bone stock LS1 with 320hp at the engine and then the price would go up from there.
The cost would go up from the stock 320rwhp. Many customers have contacted us stating that they would like to build up the LS1 prior to installation. There are too many possibilities to cover, so those specific details will be covered with the individual customer.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:44 PM
  #188  
prew's Avatar
*******
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: NJ
to each his own. for some reason, i like some others have expressed, are protective of the roatary engines who often give us problems. i personally couldnt see my car any other way, the thought of my car sounding like a camaro makes me cringe. i think the LS1 is a good motor though, i am currently looking for a impala ss as my second car. if anyone decides to do this conversion and wants to sell their 13B I am interested.

- Steve Prew
steveprew@steveprew.com
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:49 PM
  #189  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
WOW!

Where are you people from??? LOL
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #190  
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
We are from the school of classic RX-7. I have been living and breathing RX-7's as a hobby for almost 15 years. Now don't get me wrong.. I like the vettes too... BUT....................

These cars in general were the technical "tour de force"s of their day. Revolutionary technology from a little Japanese car company pissing directly in the face of GM and the like. This is not opinion... it is fact. Mazda and the rotary are like the punk sitting in the middle of a christian sunday school. They will do their own thing and succeed come hell or high water. You should read some of the books on Mazda/rotary history..... you might think differently about desecrating that car.

I don't resent the V8 conversions, but the FD is becoming more and more scarce because of dumbass kids wrecking them and others not knowing how to take care of them. I want to preserve this precious resource. Converting to V8 is like saying...."Wow the rotary scares me. I can't maintain it and I can't handle it... so let's turn it into a muscle car." WHICH IT IS NOT!!!!!!!!

Now, you can do what you want... I will not try and stop you... but to all these impressionable people who are getting "ideas" from your post... that I can try to undermine... and I WILL TRY !!!!!

SO PLEASE... if you want a V8 go buy a V8 car..... and leave these precious gems alone....or spend your money on restoring one to its originally intended glory.

Remember the FD RX-7 is and always will be THE ORIGINAL C5 Vette....just with a much cooler gimmick under the hood. Don't even try to argue with it.... their are tons of people here who will back me up and even a few honest vette enthusiasts who will do the same.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 05:51 PM
  #191  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Australia, VIC
really this is exactly how i feel about it, after reading Jimlab's thread i was very accepting of the LS1 in the FD, but this thread now is kind of starting to frighten me... i'm afraid that in 3 years when someone comes to this forum and asks a question about the 13B everyone will respond like "well if you were smart and did the LS1 conversion like everyone else... blah blah..." and i dont think that this is really what this board is all about. i guess i'm just afraid of this idea catching on, and i mean really really catching on... with these guys in this thread offering their 13B engine for sale on the spot, it does upset me just a little to see so many people "giving up" on the rotary just because something easier came along... but i guess thats just me... or does anyone else feel this way too? i hope i'm not alone and that the 13B will not soon be a thing of the past in the FD
Yeah it's a little worrying the number of people that would just drop the good old rotor for a v8 just like that (it seems). But hey it'll NEVER be that many that there'll be more v8's in them than rotors. There's too much of us rotorheads to allow that too happen
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 06:33 PM
  #192  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
Some of you continually amaze me.

Folks, this isn't a black and white world, so quit acting like it is. Step into reality and see the colors!

You act as if it's V8 vs. Rotary... It's not! What Brian has offerd is an alternative to those who don't like rotors flying through their hoods, or just want more power/better fuel economy/much more reliability at a fair cost!

You make several statements that I find comical, "The 7 is the original C5," " tour de force of their day," and the classic "desecrating that car!" Where do you get this stuff?

1. The RX-7 is just that- an (say it with me now... ) "Rrrrr Xxxx 7" - in NO way is it related to a C5. Period!

2. Force of it's day? Are you telling me that a '91-'92 ZR1 would get owned by a 7? Please tell me you're joking? Are you alluding that an RX-7 could out run/out handle a toyota supra (of the same era?). Are you saying that it would destroy a '93 Cobra of that year? Are you saying it would take a '94 Viper? If you answered yes to any of those questions, then I must warn you - Drugs ARE bad, mmmkay?

3. I'm sorry, the RX-7 is a sweet car, but it is NO Shelby Cobra 427, It is NO '58 Vette, it is NO Ford GT-40, and it is certainly no Viper. Your 7 will never be a classic. Let me repeat that, just so you can understand the thoughts I'm relaying here - You drive a car that will NOT go down in history as a classic. That's a "fact!"

Speaking about rotary history - do you even know why the rotary motor was invented? What it's first purpose was? I can assure you it wasn't designed to power a car. Is it time for a history lesson here? Why bother - you seem to already know _everything_! LOL

Enjoy your rotary powered 7, it's a sweet car! But, so is Brian's! Anyone who says differetly can't see the forest for the trees.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 06:37 PM
  #193  
V8 Lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: HinsonSuperCars.com
Do you really feel like your typing anything new that hasn't already been said? Why do I feel like I'm constantly having to type the same things over and over?
Originally posted by xurotaryrocket
These cars in general were the technical "tour de force"s of their day.
"Tour de force" for what style of car? I have driven old N/A RX7s before and they are as exciting as watching paint dry.

Revolutionary technology from a little Japanese car company
Revolutionary? Putting an engine of a modified 1920s design in a car is different, but it is far from revolutionary. I fail to see the breakthrough technology you are refering to.

pissing directly in the face of GM and the like. This is not opinion... it is fact.
I hardly think GM lost many sales of Corvettes or Camaros because of the release of a torqueless dull two seater compact decades ago. I will agree that the FD did steal some sales away from the Corvette in the early 90s, but the small glory(15K car sales) was not for long.

They will do their own thing and succeed come hell or high water.
So success is designing a car that only lasts 75K miles before a complete rebuild. Way to go team!

You should read some of the books on Mazda/rotary history..... you might think differently about desecrating that car.
Just like Shelby did that poor little AC car.

Converting to V8 is like saying...."Wow the rotary scares me. I can't maintain it and I can't handle it... so let's turn it into a muscle car."
Did you think before you typed? I can't handle adding oil and coolant every 2,000miles, but I managed to custom fabricate an awesome setup to bolt in a 400+HP V8 that will kill 95% of rotary cars on pump gas. All this being done with a rather mild and boring LS1 setup.

Now, you can do what you want... I will not try and stop you...
Thanks. I'm glad that I have your blessing.

but to all these impressionable people who are getting "ideas" from your post... that I can try to undermine... and I WILL TRY !!!!!
Do you really think that true car enthusiast willing to spend over $12,000 on an awesome car for great performance is going to change his mind because of your simple and close mided post?

Once again to all the haters... Please try to be creative in your ramblings so that we atleast get to laugh at something new.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #194  
Brad's Avatar
dear baby jesus...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: WA
I dunno Brian, I've been laughing at most of these...

Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:10 PM
  #195  
prew's Avatar
*******
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Re: Some of you continually amaze me.

Originally posted by ETraylor3
I'm sorry, the RX-7 is a sweet car, but it is NO Shelby Cobra 427, It is NO '58 Vette, it is NO Ford GT-40, and it is certainly no Viper. Your 7 will never be a classic. Let me repeat that, just so you can understand the thoughts I'm relaying here - You drive a car that will NOT go down in history as a classic. That's a "fact!"
I didnt know cars had to be american to "go down in history as a classic."
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:17 PM
  #196  
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
laughing...that is the whole point...this guy takes himself too seriously.......

Glad to see that you are the final word on this matter. Did it take you awhile to do all that cutting and pasting??

Damn... this is why my post count is so low.... this forum gets downright ignorant at times....

And just so I can get in on the shenanigans...... YOU ARE AN ICKY POOHEAD



and if you really paid attention to what I wrote and thought about it...... well i'm not wasting any more time.......
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:18 PM
  #197  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
You are correct!

Praw,

That is an astute observation!

There are many foreign classics. Unfortunately our beloved RX7 isn't one of them.

And please don't counter that statement with, "How can you say that - we have a website DEVOTED to the RX7! It's OBVIOUSLY a classic!"

I can show you a Ford cougar/thunderbird webiste, I can show you a GEO/ESCORT site, I can show you a Ford F150 website! I can assure you none of those will ever be classics either!

Please, let's get this back on topic!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:21 PM
  #198  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere!
laughing...that is the whole point...this guy takes himself too seriously.......

Glad to see that you are the final word on this matter. Did it take you awhile to do all that cutting and pasting??

Damn... this is why my post count is so low.... this forum gets downright ignorant at times....

And just so I can get in on the shenanigans...... YOU ARE AN ICKY POOHEAD



and if you really paid attention to what I wrote and thought about it...... well i'm not wasting any more time.......
Now THAT is what I'm talking about!

That is one WELL-THOUGHT-OUT response that is in-depth, contributory to the conversation at hand, and definitely an indication of the poster's ability communicate in a studious fashion!

WOW [again]!!!

Last edited by ETraylor3; Dec 11, 2002 at 07:24 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:26 PM
  #199  
xurotaryrocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
ETraylor3.

Excuse me sir,

YOU JUST HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD. That is the whole f@cking point.

SARCASM


Don't take everything so seriously... and don't get your panties in a bunch.

WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW

If you would prefer to communicate in a studious fashion then let us converse some time in a manner of your choosing. Dare I say, good chap, that this forum is not the most ideal medium in which to do so. It is with too much ease that such "shenanigans" may be taken out of hand and out of context.

Last edited by xurotaryrocket; Dec 11, 2002 at 07:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #200  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
What a freakin thread!

I'm gonna have to turn off my Internet to the house. This thread just lost me $60 in time consumed.

Brian's car is bad ***. If you have a badder *** car, good for you! Bet it cost 3 times as much though!

(That was fun. I just sounded like a litter ricer pansy!)





Show us a rotary w/ 400 ponies and gets 28 mpg!

Until then.......
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.