The RX-7 confirmed to be in the pipeline for 2017---RX-Vision Unveil!!
#3326
Full Member
So, hopefully, with a well thought out engine that is not rushed through development we should see quite an improvement in the reliability department.
#3327
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
I wonder if Mazda will finally implement a large capacity oil reservoir for either engine oil or 2cycle this time around for the oil metering system? Something large enough to last in between oil changes. They could also put a dedicated low metering oil level indicator in the dash as a warning. I think this will be more user friendly and better for the engine not having the sump oil levels drop between oil changes and they could run synthetics in the sump. Make it so Mazda.
#3328
Senior Member
It is odd that they delivered a number of cars to market engines that consume oil normatively but have never thought to add some kind of monitoring/warning system to tell the driver to top up.
#3329
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,770
Received 2,562 Likes
on
1,822 Posts
keep in mind Mazda is small, and when Ford took over they basically got rid of the R&D department, so the rotary engine group in 2002 was one guy.
i know the above scenario sounds really obvious and dumb, but Ford took over Mazda in 1996, and Ford, basically is a history of insanity.*
with the FD, they had two problems. the first being that when the car came out, there were like 5 people in the world who knew how it worked, and second the bean counters pinched a few too many pennies.
there is a boost solenoid, its the white one. the hose sees boost, and pops off. when it pops off you get no second turbo. there were many many many cars that got multiple sets of turbos because this hose popped off. the previous Cosmo has a clamp on this hose, but the FD doesn't.
as a proof the warranty history of a 93 car can be a couple of pages, but a 95 car is usually really short, so the FD can be reliable, it just wasn't sussed out
*the Edsel has the transmission control push buttons in the center of the steering wheel. so when someone cuts you off, and to go to honk the horn, you put the trans in reverse when you're moving which blows it up. one would think that they would have noticed this in testing, but they didn't. Ford lost $250,000,000 in 1960 money on the Edsel.
#3330
Full Member
I wonder if Mazda will finally implement a large capacity oil reservoir for either engine oil or 2cycle this time around for the oil metering system? Something large enough to last in between oil changes. They could also put a dedicated low metering oil level indicator in the dash as a warning. I think this will be more user friendly and better for the engine not having the sump oil levels drop between oil changes and they could run synthetics in the sump. Make it so Mazda.
Wasn't the Rx-8 initially touted as using 1 quart of oil every 10000 miles? If Mazda could really achieve that figure with the new engine, an oil injection tank could be used, and a fairly small one at that.
And users are now becoming accustomed to having to fill up other tanks in their cars other than the fuel tank, at least with the latest diesel engines. PSA has been using their version of the DPF that requires the use of a liquid catalyst to promote filter regeneration. And more recently manufacturers have been adding AdBlue injection systems which, again, require an additional tank that must be filled up.
So the prospect of forcing users to filling up two separate fluids should not be such a no-no anymore for manufacturers.
Such an oil injection system would have several advantages: using 2-stroke oil that is designed to burn cleanly will certainly help with emissions when compared to burning 4-stroke oil. And the fact that it would be clean oil that is injected will help lubricate the engine better, a good thing for reliability (and maybe for fuel consumption?). There would be less chance of clogged oil lines due to deposits, further helping reliability. Finally, 2-stroke oil is (usually) cheaper
#3331
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
I think that's a possibility. With the 2014 research on the rotary oil consumption and newer seal materials (requiring less oil), the overall oil consumption may drop to the point where a reasonably sized oil tank may be enough to go between oil changes.
Wasn't the Rx-8 initially touted as using 1 quart of oil every 10000 miles? If Mazda could really achieve that figure with the new engine, an oil injection tank could be used, and a fairly small one at that.
And users are now becoming accustomed to having to fill up other tanks in their cars other than the fuel tank, at least with the latest diesel engines. PSA has been using their version of the DPF that requires the use of a liquid catalyst to promote filter regeneration. And more recently manufacturers have been adding AdBlue injection systems which, again, require an additional tank that must be filled up.
So the prospect of forcing users to filling up two separate fluids should not be such a no-no anymore for manufacturers.
Such an oil injection system would have several advantages: using 2-stroke oil that is designed to burn cleanly will certainly help with emissions when compared to burning 4-stroke oil. And the fact that it would be clean oil that is injected will help lubricate the engine better, a good thing for reliability (and maybe for fuel consumption?). There would be less chance of clogged oil lines due to deposits, further helping reliability. Finally, 2-stroke oil is (usually) cheaper
Wasn't the Rx-8 initially touted as using 1 quart of oil every 10000 miles? If Mazda could really achieve that figure with the new engine, an oil injection tank could be used, and a fairly small one at that.
And users are now becoming accustomed to having to fill up other tanks in their cars other than the fuel tank, at least with the latest diesel engines. PSA has been using their version of the DPF that requires the use of a liquid catalyst to promote filter regeneration. And more recently manufacturers have been adding AdBlue injection systems which, again, require an additional tank that must be filled up.
So the prospect of forcing users to filling up two separate fluids should not be such a no-no anymore for manufacturers.
Such an oil injection system would have several advantages: using 2-stroke oil that is designed to burn cleanly will certainly help with emissions when compared to burning 4-stroke oil. And the fact that it would be clean oil that is injected will help lubricate the engine better, a good thing for reliability (and maybe for fuel consumption?). There would be less chance of clogged oil lines due to deposits, further helping reliability. Finally, 2-stroke oil is (usually) cheaper
#3332
Full Member
Yeah, I know. I was just saying that AFAIK such a figure was initially mentioned before the Rx-8 came out, only to be proven wrong by quite a bit.
If this time Mazda could make it happen for real, it could very well be the end of the rotary's reputation for burning oil.
Dry sump
If this time Mazda could make it happen for real, it could very well be the end of the rotary's reputation for burning oil.
Dry sump
#3333
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
Really the big oil loss in the rotary hasn't been from the little bit they inject to lubricate the apex seals.
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
Mazda has fixed this issue with their new oil study and have done such a good job that they had to add oil injectors for the side seals now!
My RX-8 auto with ~60k miles now uses very very little oil in normal driving.
When I flog it along at 47mph in 1st gear all day (auto-x or mountain roads) it can use a quart in an hour or so. The low oil light lets me know when to add a quart or more.
Leakage past the rotor...
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
Mazda has fixed this issue with their new oil study and have done such a good job that they had to add oil injectors for the side seals now!
My RX-8 auto with ~60k miles now uses very very little oil in normal driving.
When I flog it along at 47mph in 1st gear all day (auto-x or mountain roads) it can use a quart in an hour or so. The low oil light lets me know when to add a quart or more.
Leakage past the rotor...
#3334
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
In contrast my turbo rotaries usually make oil. Its magic.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
#3335
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,770
Received 2,562 Likes
on
1,822 Posts
In contrast my turbo rotaries usually make oil. Its magic.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
#3336
Full Member
Really the big oil loss in the rotary hasn't been from the little bit they inject to lubricate the apex seals.
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
In contrast my turbo rotaries usually make oil. Its magic.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
Okay- no, it is fuel dilution of the oil.
The new turbo 16X with revised oil sealing/injection will probably be back to oil producing instead of oil consuming unless they have all the injectors direct injection and none at the port or upstream.
One thing though: the "rotated" engine layout basically prevents putting fuel injectors where they were on the 16X. Given that the intake side of the engine is already cluttered with the oil injectors (as seen in the patents), that only leaves a few places where the direct fuel injectors can be placed. Basically next to the spark plugs.
That is unless Mazda is happy putting fuel injectors inside the oil pan.
#3337
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUE TII View Post
Mazda has fixed this issue with their new oil study and have done such a good job that they had to add oil injectors for the side seals now!
Wait, The S2 Rx-8 already had 3 oil injectors per rotor. Do you mean that Mazda will add even more oil injectors?
The new oil studies were done 2014- so, yes; different ideas than the S2 RX-8.
more injectors? Probably not, but in different areas.
#3339
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before anyone freaks out about the mustang-looking RX-7, those are an "artist's" rendering. If it ends up looking like that, I'll be pissed, but I'm sure it won't.
The system is exactly what I was talking about wanting for this car. Mild hybrids like this are the future. So many benefits and no draw backs. (Well, except replacing a belt is easier than figuring out what wire isn't working, and OEM can really **** up the ECU software that controls these electrical systems...)
Mazda already has their i-ELOOP.
Replacing the starter motor and alternator with a 15-25hp electric motor isn't much of a weight increase at all.
Replacing pullies and belts reduces parasitic loss.
A fully 48v system is lighter than a 12v system or hybrid 12v/48v one.
And, of course, you have the stored electricity to spool up the turbo quickly at any RPM.
It ends up adding more than the 15-25 hp of the engine, because on WoT, instead of an alternator, water pump, oil pump, and other systems draining 15+ hp from the engine, they're draining none and you're adding the electric power for a 30-50hp increase. (assuming there is stored electricity in the cap/batteries to power those)
So not only do you get a 10-30% increase in fuel economy, you get a 10-15% increase in power. And really, more like a 50% increase in power off idle.
The weight should be the same as an equivalent 12v ICE system, or at most 75lb or so which is well worth the power increases.
A typical 12v ICE system is just so inefficient, archaic, and bad for a street car.
This is correct, and I hear there are further improvements coming in the seal designs on the new engine.
Sump pan?
The new RX better have a freaking dry sump like pretty much every super sportscar has these days.
Mazda already has their i-ELOOP.
Replacing the starter motor and alternator with a 15-25hp electric motor isn't much of a weight increase at all.
Replacing pullies and belts reduces parasitic loss.
A fully 48v system is lighter than a 12v system or hybrid 12v/48v one.
And, of course, you have the stored electricity to spool up the turbo quickly at any RPM.
It ends up adding more than the 15-25 hp of the engine, because on WoT, instead of an alternator, water pump, oil pump, and other systems draining 15+ hp from the engine, they're draining none and you're adding the electric power for a 30-50hp increase. (assuming there is stored electricity in the cap/batteries to power those)
So not only do you get a 10-30% increase in fuel economy, you get a 10-15% increase in power. And really, more like a 50% increase in power off idle.
The weight should be the same as an equivalent 12v ICE system, or at most 75lb or so which is well worth the power increases.
A typical 12v ICE system is just so inefficient, archaic, and bad for a street car.
Really the big oil loss in the rotary hasn't been from the little bit they inject to lubricate the apex seals.
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
It has been that the side housings warp once warm (worse with side exhaust ports) and the oil control rings stay flat and don't seal- so you get a bunch of oil up along the side of the rotor that gets flung past the side seals especially when diluted with fuel from the intake port (partially open/close port blows onto rotor side).
Think the Rx8 uses quite a bit more oil than 1gt per 10,000 miles. Also if they keep lowering the engine, it just makes it harder to add capacity to the sump with it being shallower. Shallow sumps don't do so well with oil slush. I really do want the dedicated oil metering sump this time around.
The new RX better have a freaking dry sump like pretty much every super sportscar has these days.
Last edited by zaque; 11-14-16 at 12:11 PM.
#3340
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The solution to all their engineering problems already exist, it's called the piston engine. Not only does it address all their engineering problems, but it makes financial sense too. Any advances they engineer for the new RX engine can be leveraged throughout their model lineup. Every dollar invested in R&D will be reaped manifold.
Personally, I'd like to see a state of the art high compression turbo 4 cyl. making ~400hp in an ultra lightweight RX. It'd essentially be the most exciting car you could possible drive, and that includes the exotics.
#3341
Full Member
iTrader: (3)
This list could go on forever (excessive heat, no technical knowledge from mechanics, knock tolerance, etc). I know the rotary is a passion project for someone important at Mazda (since it certainly doesn't make sense profit-wise), but going down the list weaknesses and trying to address each one is like trying to plug a leaking dam with your fingers. And even if they did manage to engineer solutions to mitigate all the weaknesses, Mazda wouldn't be able to leverage the money, time, effort, and resources spent because no other cars in their lineup even use a rotary. Mazda is literally going to lose money on every RX to do what - so they can use an inferior engine?
The solution to all their engineering problems already exist, it's called the piston engine. Not only does it address all their engineering problems, but it makes financial sense too. Any advances they engineer for the new RX engine can be leveraged throughout their model lineup. Every dollar invested in R&D will be reaped manifold.
Personally, I'd like to see a state of the art high compression turbo 4 cyl. making ~400hp in an ultra lightweight RX. It'd essentially be the most exciting car you could possible drive, and that includes the exotics.
The solution to all their engineering problems already exist, it's called the piston engine. Not only does it address all their engineering problems, but it makes financial sense too. Any advances they engineer for the new RX engine can be leveraged throughout their model lineup. Every dollar invested in R&D will be reaped manifold.
Personally, I'd like to see a state of the art high compression turbo 4 cyl. making ~400hp in an ultra lightweight RX. It'd essentially be the most exciting car you could possible drive, and that includes the exotics.
It would then cease to be an rx and become an mx. you just described an mx-5 Rf mazdaspeed edition.
#3342
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
I agree the rotary has a lot of disadvantages compared to the best piston engines (which Mazda doesn't make either btw).
I also am frustrated that Mazda has refused to exploit the rotaries actual advantages (compact dimensions and low weight) to their fullest.
Current crash standards and consumer demand for big cars does not suit the rotary.
Meanwhile, Mazda has done an amazing job getting the Roadster/Miata/MX-5 back to its lightweight roots.
A 350lb 400hp 16X rotary in a 2,400lb hard top ND chassis for $40k-50K would be an exotic car killer and the rotaries advantages in that chassis could mitigate its ho-hum gas mileage (if Mazda can improve it to ho-hum standards from abysmal).
Even a turbo 4cyl engine would be taller and ~100lbs heavier- which would affect such a car.
Again, doesn't look like the direction Mazda is going with the rotary, so I have to grudgingly agree with you.
I am very glad Mazda is making a new rotary car, but will it be relevant? I guess we will see.
With the all new modern tooling and if Mazda revises some processes rotary engine production could at least be quite cheap/fast compared to past rotaries using the old late '60s tooling/processes/assembly.
I also am frustrated that Mazda has refused to exploit the rotaries actual advantages (compact dimensions and low weight) to their fullest.
Current crash standards and consumer demand for big cars does not suit the rotary.
Meanwhile, Mazda has done an amazing job getting the Roadster/Miata/MX-5 back to its lightweight roots.
A 350lb 400hp 16X rotary in a 2,400lb hard top ND chassis for $40k-50K would be an exotic car killer and the rotaries advantages in that chassis could mitigate its ho-hum gas mileage (if Mazda can improve it to ho-hum standards from abysmal).
Even a turbo 4cyl engine would be taller and ~100lbs heavier- which would affect such a car.
Again, doesn't look like the direction Mazda is going with the rotary, so I have to grudgingly agree with you.
I am very glad Mazda is making a new rotary car, but will it be relevant? I guess we will see.
With the all new modern tooling and if Mazda revises some processes rotary engine production could at least be quite cheap/fast compared to past rotaries using the old late '60s tooling/processes/assembly.
#3343
Full Member
Mazda working on "fundamental and structure issues of rotary engine", no electrified RX model
2016 LA Motor Show: Mazda rotary engine to return in 2019
- So, Mazda 2 EV in 2019, likely with the RE range extender option.
- As for the Rx, it will come back, but no timeframe given (as usual ).
- “completely new technology” for the new generation SkyActiv rotary engine, with the ignition system one area of focus. HCCI?
- No decision had yet been made on whether to employ turbocharging. Maybe Mazda is unsure whether to embrace the high-revving nature of the rotary with an NA engine or whether to go for the "safer" option of using a turbo. One hopes that both approaches are being developed in parallel for now.
- No hybrid for the new rotary, at least initially. Maybe at a later time when regulations become more restrictive and if battery technology improves enough
One quote says "Turbochargers is one of the possibilities for our smaller rotary engines". Does it mean that there are also larger rotary engines?
2016 LA Motor Show: Mazda rotary engine to return in 2019
- So, Mazda 2 EV in 2019, likely with the RE range extender option.
- As for the Rx, it will come back, but no timeframe given (as usual ).
- “completely new technology” for the new generation SkyActiv rotary engine, with the ignition system one area of focus. HCCI?
- No decision had yet been made on whether to employ turbocharging. Maybe Mazda is unsure whether to embrace the high-revving nature of the rotary with an NA engine or whether to go for the "safer" option of using a turbo. One hopes that both approaches are being developed in parallel for now.
- No hybrid for the new rotary, at least initially. Maybe at a later time when regulations become more restrictive and if battery technology improves enough
One quote says "Turbochargers is one of the possibilities for our smaller rotary engines". Does it mean that there are also larger rotary engines?
#3344
Senior Member
I've been saying for a while, somebody should make a compact, short-wheelbase, lightweight 50/50 sports car with a very low hood/cowl with a compact V4.
#3347
Senior Member
I'd be happy with 8k 2.5 liter or 9k 2.0 liter, but of course 11k would be fine!
#3348
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,770
Received 2,562 Likes
on
1,822 Posts
plus you can maybe still use 2 cams, instead of 4, etc, so it may be a bit lighter.
kind of like a 1930's Lancia