When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Rx7 means maybe too much, Rx8 means something, but it has an aftertaste. Cosmo is my choice, it sounds like something, and it has a pedigree.
Rx9 is just a number and some letters, means nothing
Hmm never thought about it from that point of view. You make a great point because the 2015 Chrysler 200 is a far superior car than the old Seabring based model. Chrysler screwed up by re-naming the last gen model the 200 (when it was still based of the old Seabring platform) when the 2015 is all new and based on the Alfa Romeo platform. So the new name is already tarnished. It's having a hard time gaining traction due it's past Seabring history though.
A 450hp 3,000lb RX-Vision is still a bad *** car that others here wanted and I think it *looks* amazing.
If it's 450 hp, it'd be $90k+.
It would have a better power to weight ratio of the NSX and similar one to the GT-R NISMO, let alone obliterating the best 911.
I'm hoping it simply performs around Cayman GTS or GT4 levels, which is low 4s 0-60, feels like a track car for the street that is trying to kill you, and is more reasonably priced around 38-53k.
Originally Posted by Valkyrie
That has WAY too much over hang for a rotary.
1400 kilos? Seriously?
To both of you:
They said they're going for less than a Cayman. Do you guys have any idea how small this car is? The concept smaller overall than the FD and they are talking about making it even smaller for production and not larger.
The engine bay only appears to be less than 20" deep. No way it's fitting a 25"-27.5" LS engine that fits in the FD engine bay. That's how small this car is. Look at pictures of people beside it.
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
The newest rumors/leaks are that the new RX will have 450hp with a turbocharger that uses capacitors/electric asist for initial spool and a rear dual clutch transaxle (we saw 2 pedals on RX-Vision).
Additionally, the CF parts I speculated on earlier were mentioned.
This recent article backs up what I was theorizing about the Skyactiv-R 16X possibly using supercritical injection for a sparkplug-less Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition engine earlier in this thread.
Pretty much completely unfounded rumors, and I'll explain why:
First off, the HCCI.
HCCI only works at low RPM. Mazda's next generation of Skyactiv piston engines will still use a spark plug at higher RPM.
And they confirm turbo. So how is it going to be HCCI and turbo?
You would need a turbo that's working at idle like diesel, along with using the spark plugs to get it going and spinning the turbo enough for a very high compression ratio of 18:1
That's DOUBLE the compression ratio a lot of past Rotary engines had and you don't use a turbo with 18:1 compression ratio.
The turbo can add to the heat and compression to enable HCCI, but it's very hard to control as the intake and engine temps change.
Then there's the biggest problem with both of these:
You know how bad backpressure is for a rotary, right? I mean... this is the rx7 forums.
One of the big problems is getting all the exhaust to exit after the combustion cycle and not overlap into the next cycle.
You want the least backpressure possible. That's why removing emissions crap improves out reliability an insane amount.
Both of these things greatly increase backpressure.
That hybrid turbo that uses something like i-ELOOP to spin the turbo at low RPM, and draws the turbo to charge it at higher RPM instead of using a wastegate like McLaren is exploring is super cool, but you... understand how much backpressure that creates drawing on the turbo like that? It's a big problem that seems totally unfeasible for me for a rotary.
These also both contradict how they said they're shooting for lighter than a Cayman which is 1310kg(2888lb).
They'd also have to really fail as Engineers to make a car that's heavier than a Cayman despite being significantly smaller, having a much lighter engine, and with them being the people that made the new 2200-2300lb MX-5
What would make a hell of a lot more sense and be so much simpler is simply having a variable geometry turbo, and not cheaping out with spark plugs and adding a third spark plug for each rotor to improve low RPM flame combustion. Maybe even a forth at the top to improve high RPM as well.
You're making too many assumptions on technology that hasn't even hit production yet, its very likely that we will see previous limits and ideas on combustion change.
According to this masters thesis the rotary engine can operate over a broader range in hcci than piston engines. It's a long read but very interesting. (pdf file) https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_f...osition=inline
....I'm hoping it simply performs around Cayman GTS or GT4 levels, which is low 4s 0-60, feels like a track car for the street that is trying to kill you, and is more reasonably priced around 38-53k...
Based on everything I've read and gathered (and after reading your entire post, it appears that we've read all of the same things) I think this is EXACTLY what we're going to get. And I can't wait!
Oh, and it will be called "Rx-7". There was an interview with the Design Chief (I think) where he basically said this...
Based on everything I've read and gathered (and after reading your entire post, it appears that we've read all of the same things) I think this is EXACTLY what we're going to get. And I can't wait!
Oh, and it will be called "Rx-7". There was an interview with the Design Chief (I think) where he basically said this...
yeah but would you buy it NEW though at such a price? They don't make money off guys on internet forums who can't wait until it comes off warranty in the used market.
Hence, Jalopnik people loving a CTS-V manual transmission wagon but nobody actually buying one.
After you install all of the US safety crap backup camera blue tooth and nav system all the driver aids that will be required for it to be sold to the masses. I will keep my FD
j9fd3s the Fiat miata just landed 2017 Fiat 124 Spider: This Is It, All Official And Stuff
I predict the love this thing gets in the automotive press may sway Mazda to rethink the MX-5 "not enough power to get in trouble formula".
Return of Mazdaspeed MX-5?
it would be really easy, just sell it with the Fiat engine. i think the fiat is a little clunky looking (the front and the back look like 2 different cars?), but 160hp and some italian should have the thing selling like hotcakes
yeah but would you buy it NEW though at such a price? They don't make money off guys on internet forums who can't wait until it comes off warranty in the used market.
Hence, Jalopnik people loving a CTS-V manual transmission wagon but nobody actually buying one.
yeah but would you buy it NEW though at such a price? They don't make money off guys on internet forums who can't wait until it comes off warranty in the used market.
Hence, Jalopnik people loving a CTS-V manual transmission wagon but nobody actually buying one.
The subiyota sold pretty well though didn't it? The internet hivemind screams about every car but I think as a demographic it is willing to buy new for roughly $30k and under.
You and me both! I missed out on buying my fd brand new because I was a broke high school kid at the time. I will wait a couple years though to make sure all the bugs are worked out and to find out if a 3 rotor option will be on the cards.
I'd bet the Fiata isn't actually faster. I don't know why everyone is assuming it will be.
It has pretty much the same engine as the Abarth 500, and a similar weight. The Abarth 500 went 0-60 in 6.8s. The Fiata is RWD so it'll do better than that, and might have shorter gearing, but still. It's heavier, and its powerband isn't as flat.
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
I predict the love this thing gets in the automotive press may sway Mazda to rethink the MX-5 "not enough power to get in trouble formula".
Return of Mazdaspeed MX-5?
It's likely they have an agreement with FCA not to, and that the Fiata will be priced a bit higher.
They are making a turbo 2.5 for the CX-9. No reason why they couldn't use similar parts in the MX-5 for a Mazdaspeed version.
Originally Posted by arghx
yeah but would you buy it NEW though at such a price? They don't make money off guys on internet forums who can't wait until it comes off warranty in the used market.
If it's around that 38-53k MSRP and has good standard features instead of it costing like 60k to be decently equipped, then yeah I'd buy one new.
Assuming the money I'm making keeps increasing and I can afford it.
Previously I was looking forward to a used Cayman in a few years. I'd rather have a new RX-7 if it's not unreliable and its resale value isn't going to tank.
I'd bet the Fiata isn't actually faster. I don't know why everyone is assuming it will be.
It has pretty much the same engine as the Abarth 500, and a similar weight. The Abarth 500 went 0-60 in 6.8s. The Fiata is RWD so it'll do better than that, and might have shorter gearing, but still. It's heavier, and its powerband isn't as flat.
You might think that just comparing manufacturer's claimed HP figures..
The Abarth 500 regularly puts down more wheel hp on a dynojet stock than factory claimed crank? HP.
The ND MX-5 dynos a very good 140rwhp (testament to Mazda's drivetrain efficiency).
Flat torque is only good if there is torque, at no point does the Abarth 500's "peaky" torque drop below the ND MX-5 torque.
Stock Abarth 500
Stock ND MX-5
And then the fact that turbo cars gain hp so well with light mods...
^ Not much drivetrain loss there! You would think the ND was rocking a carbon fiber driveshaft. No???? I know smaller diameter wheel/tire combo helps too.
^ Not much drivetrain loss there! You would think the ND was rocking a carbon fiber driveshaft. No???? I know smaller diameter wheel/tire combo helps too.
i've been reading the ND service highlights, and Mazda revised basically EVERYTHING, on the car to reduce friction, and other losses. they made the accessories closer together so they could reduce the belt tension, which is controlled by engine oil pressure. the oil pump has two relief valves, one ecu controlled so that the oil pressure is more steady.
when was the last time you worried about the oil pressure fluctuation and the amount of energy that took?
11-16-15, 02:30 PM
