wondering bout 2nd gens
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: confusion
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wondering bout 2nd gens
im lookin to get a new car soon(cause i wrecked my old one) and was wondering if anyone could give me some pros and cons of the rx7. right now im debating between the 300zx and rx7 any help would be appreaciated
#4
Full Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Waldport, OR
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend of mine has a '91 300zx with the Auto tranny. It is pretty slow... I guess if you hold your foot into it, its not bad, but it is no quick V6 thats for sure (maybe the 5spd is much faster?). I ended up getting a '88 GLX and I think its a more practical car, better? I don't know, but it is faster.
#6
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are obviously both sports cars. The RX-7 is more aimed at the performance side of things. If you want a car that is capable in all performance areas then RX-7s are for you. The feel of a car with good design cannot be replicated. Driving a FC is fun even in boring situations.
Reading material:
http://www.aaroncake.net/RX-7/tech1.htm
Reading material:
http://www.aaroncake.net/RX-7/tech1.htm
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
go with the rx-7. its original. the 300z if I am not mistaken is a sporty car with a maxima motor in it. The 7 is a true blooded sports car with a rotary engine. unlike the piston breed, the rotary is so smooth and it is powerful too. The only drawbacks are its fuel consumption, which is very poor if compared with a same size piston engine, and oil consumption, they eat oil.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats all bullshit. 300z's are faster in NA form than RX7s are, but if you dont have the money to mod a 300z go for an RX. My friend has a stock 93 5spd 300z and its pretty quick for the cow that it is. Its definitely faster than a stock 2nd gen. I still prefer my RX because i can get it going faster for cheaper than he can. But id still love to have a 300z. If the people replying owned a 300z instead of an RX they'd say the 300 was better.
#9
I wanta be with the BUC!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which is very poor if compared with a same size piston engine,
Ohh, lets see 1.3 liter, about 90 cubic inches= 10 horsee power gocart motor And you can run one of those all day on a gallon of gas.
#10
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The final gen 300ZX is a lot more expensive than a FC. It's certainly faster in a straight line n/a to n/a, turbo to turbo. A '93 300ZX is more price comparable to a FD. I would think the second last gen 300ZX is what one would normally consider if also considering a FC. In that race it's no contest. Even comparing to this class of vehicle, the FC has many positive aspects.
To compare gas consumption look at engines of similar power and vintage; Supra, 300ZX, 5.0L. A FC uses more gas. On the flip side I don't think one could drive one of those engines as hard as many of us do on a daily basis.
To compare gas consumption look at engines of similar power and vintage; Supra, 300ZX, 5.0L. A FC uses more gas. On the flip side I don't think one could drive one of those engines as hard as many of us do on a daily basis.
#12
After working on a 300 youll hate life Their bays are so crowded. You have to friggin pull the motor to get the turbos off. On my fc it takes like 30 minutes of ******* around and working slowly.
#13
Do a barrel roll!
iTrader: (4)
A friend of mine owns a very nice 86 N/A 300ZX. This just happens to be the same person that I had bought my FC from years ago. Even he admits that my Rx-7 was way more fun to drive, and seemed slightly faster than his 300. Im not stock now, so I rape it, but he says from what he remembered he thinks the 7 was a bit quicker. In the fun to drive factor its no contest, the 300 is a bit on the heavy side and just feels sloppy in the twisties...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM