2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Why does the convertible weigh so much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-05, 06:29 PM
  #1  
I live in an igloo

Thread Starter
 
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why does the convertible weigh so much?

Is it the cover assembly that takes all the weight?
I've also noticed that some particular engine parts must be for the convertible and not the coupe? Why is this?

Just curious
Old 10-16-05, 06:40 PM
  #2  
Green Flameless

iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, most of the extra weight is in the subframe. They have to do a lot of reinforcement to keep the chassis as stiff as the coupe. The top of the vert really doesn't weigh that much more or less than the B pillar and up on a coupe, especially with the rear glass and a sunroof factored in, I'm guessing.

I don't think I've noticed any particular engine parts different, but I'm probably wrong. I know the suspension parts are different, to deal with the different weight and center of gravity..
Old 10-16-05, 08:59 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Trav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pretty certain the engine parts are identical in all N/As (for corresponding series/years). I've never seen any difference.

Wonko is correct -- most of the weight is w/ the additional frame reinforcement. Take a look at this thread of mine -- it will give you a good visual of the frame reinforcement on a vert. If someone can find similar pics for a coupe, you could compare.

https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/91-vert-painting-progress-crystal-white-lots-pictures-427958/
Old 10-16-05, 09:34 PM
  #4  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
homebrewer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the extra weight was due to the required fat chick in the passenger seat when driving around with the top down.
Old 10-16-05, 09:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
MazdaTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine parts from the coupe (my 89 vert has 90 GXL engine ("block") with the vert parts bolted to it) My understanding is that it is the exact same as the fully loaded coupe big brakes beefer springs shocks sways. but why 200 Lbs of stiffening? who knows why, Icemark probably does. you would think they would use aluminum or something light of that nature after all they used aluminium pedals and that saved what like 10 Lbs?

Ill bet that motor ways a lot too.

Last edited by MazdaTed; 10-16-05 at 09:56 PM.
Old 10-16-05, 10:03 PM
  #6  
5th time the charm

 
DesmoFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The subframe is definitely heavier. I notice a few extra beams ( or whatever you call themsupporting the car) when I lift it up for an oil change vs a coupe. As far as weight savings go the vert has an aluminum hood vs a steel hood. That saves some pounds also I guess.
Old 10-16-05, 11:11 PM
  #7  
I am the stig.

 
Twofer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 614
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DesmoFO
As far as weight savings go the vert has an aluminum hood vs a steel hood. That saves some pounds also I guess.
I've been looking for an aluminum hood for my coupe, are they compatible? Any idea what the weight difference is?

-Twofer
Old 10-16-05, 11:15 PM
  #8  
TRUST PWRD

iTrader: (1)
 
dufourmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Welland
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some verts also came wiht the t2 ecu or just the harness, or so ive read, but it may not be true
Old 10-16-05, 11:17 PM
  #9  
Buildup Thread Encourager

iTrader: (1)
 
Syncro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got an aluminum one on my FC. Their compatible
Old 10-17-05, 07:36 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
pmr2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I happened to weight the removable roof panel section this weekend while taking it off, I got 21.5 lbs. I would think the top would weight less than the coupes roof and hatch glass, but maybe not?

Plus the aluminum hood saves about 20 pounds, the BBS wheels also save a few pounds.

Amazing how much the extra bracing underneath must weight.
Old 10-17-05, 10:19 AM
  #11  
GET OFF MY LAWN

iTrader: (1)
 
jgrewe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fla.
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The metal the rocker panels, inner and outer, are made from is at least twice as thick on the 'vert. There is additional metal layers where the doors attach behind the front fenders up to the cowl, all thicker than the coupe too. Also lots of extra bracing welded in in various places with a huge one the whole width behind the seats.
Old 10-17-05, 10:25 AM
  #12  
Damn I miss having a RX7.

 
BlueS5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fl
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've lost it on this one!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
10-06-15 12:28 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
10-02-15 07:56 PM



Quick Reply: Why does the convertible weigh so much?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.