2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

tuning with an egt guage Q's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
tuning with an egt guage Q's

I havent installed it yet, but will be putting a 1600 guaqge with the probe in the most upper part of the downpipe in my T2. What #'s should I be looking for (ie 2rich 2lean)? Also how accurate is this guage compared to my AM AF guage? Thanx guys
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
bump
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
ponykiller's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: KC
what gauge did you get? I have the top of the line autometer EGT gauge, and it is very accurate, but the lower priced ones are crap.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 11:11 AM
  #4  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Ya I was wondering this too. I bought the GReddy elec. one and will be putting the probe the same place.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 11:13 AM
  #5  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
You should be looking for around 1500-1550 F at WOT.
It will be much more accurate than the LED show of the AM A/F meter.
Sean Cathcart
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 07:54 PM
  #6  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
GReddy should read 780&#176C at WOT.



-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 09:58 PM
  #7  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Ok and I'm sorry if I sound stupid but what is where you definitely don't want it to get, like too lean?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 11:18 PM
  #8  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Anything over 800&#176C under WOT!&nbsp The EGT's will sometimes over slightly over 800&#176C under steady state crusing - this is due to the ECU running in closed loop trying to keep stoic on the AFR's.&nbsp If you see it creeping upwards on WOT, lift off!&nbsp Otherwise, you don't want to see anything over 900&#176C - there's a reason why the GReddy "redlines" at 900&#176C!



-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
800C+=?farenheit?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 12:02 AM
  #10  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
800=1472 900=1650

I'd really get a wide band o2 for tuning...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 12:35 AM
  #11  
dcamcoTII's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
What is the ideal A/F for a wideband?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 09:29 AM
  #12  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
820 was the number to watch for on an NA, correct?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 05:17 PM
  #13  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally posted by jon88se
820 was the number to watch for on an NA, correct?
Depends on where you place the EGT probe?



-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 08:35 PM
  #14  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
right after the exhaust manifold where my exhaust starts and it's easier to drill in a probe.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #15  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Yeah, just about.&nbsp I'd try and shoot for 800&#176C first then start leaning out to see if it's safe...


-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 08:54 PM
  #16  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
great, thanks!! also, assuming I'm running those EGT numbers, what kind of RWHP figures should my 88 NA put out with the following power mods?
-2.5 inch downpipe, mid pipe (no cats), 2.25 inch Y pipe w/ 2.5 inch Apexi mufflers, K&N, underdrive crank pulley, no ACV/Airpump, open 6 ports, RB aluminum flywheel w/ centerforce dual friction clutch, TB mod.

Would 150 @ the wheels be unreasonable?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 11:21 PM
  #17  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
I'd say it'll do 150 easy.&nbsp You talking stock exhaust manifold right?




-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 12:54 AM
  #18  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
yea, stock manifold...headers on this setup I suspect would be WAY loud and the racepipe is supposed to give similar gains compared to a header from what I've read. I'd like to hit 14's before I have a motor built to handle a turbo and I wonder how far off I'd be.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 10:35 PM
  #19  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
So with the probe plumbed into my downpipe just after the flange, at full boost WOT, I should be looking for temps between 750 and 800, correct?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #20  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
according to what RETed has said (and I trust him since I bet he's been asked MANY MANY times), I guess there is a slight difference between the TII and NA (NA can run a little leaner i gather) but seems like thats the ballpark. I'd try to run a little more rich in the turbo just because temps and elevations will effect boost without a good boost controller (i think).
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 06:44 PM
  #21  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Yes, there are differences between NA and turbo.

For one turbos run a little richer to ward of detonation.&nbsp I typically see 780&#176C on my GReddy in the turbo exhaust manifold BEFORE the turbo itself.&nbsp When I was running the GReddy EGT in the downpipe (Racing Beat 3"), it used to read 720&#176C at WOT.&nbsp A turbo AFR runs about 11.5:1 to 12.5:1 ratios.&nbsp An NA can run leaner than that, so therefore the slightly elevated EGT's for an NA.

Second, the turbo uses some of the heat from the exhaust to work.&nbsp Thus the lower EGT readings in the downpipe after the turbo.


-Ted

Last edited by RETed; Apr 22, 2002 at 06:49 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Logan Reinisch
General Rotary Tech Support
44
Sep 17, 2018 12:20 PM
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 2, 2015 06:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.