2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

True Dual with H-Pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #1  
RX7Tuner.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
I really Schruted it
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
True Dual with H-Pipe

If this has been covered before I apoligize for the redundancy.

What do you guys think about running an H-Pipe with true dual exhaust? I get a lot of pulsing in my exhaust flow (pushing out than sucking in) and I wonder if it would benefit from conjoining the pipes. Has anyone ever tried this? What do you think? My application would be for an RB setup.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
H-pipes don't work on rotary engines. If you want the H-pipe type effect, then use a short (22-27") collected exhaust or long (120-125") collected exhaust. Pipe should be about 1.75" inside diameter. You can gradually increase the pipe size as it gets further to the rear if you like.

Yes, the RB headers collect at the wrong point. Why? I have no idea.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
What about an x-pipe setup? Would this help with a ported NA application?

Ramses666
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #4  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by ramses666
What about an x-pipe setup? Would this help with a ported NA application?

Ramses666
Mazda NA rotary engines: Endurance racing since 1969
Number of X or H pipes I have seen on competitive RX-7's: 0

While it may be possible to get a lot of power from an X or H pipe, I would assume that just about everything that could be thought of has already been tried by people smarter and wealthier than us.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 12:47 AM
  #5  
GORacing's Avatar
Bumble Bee RX-3
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, Florida
The H pipe design is for sound modification, it bleeds pressure off as the exhaust pulse travels past it and routes it down the other tube, the X-pipe is considered to be an improvment to the design by making the pressure bleed off more gradual and offering less restriction to over all flow, not really a power adder, just minimizes loss while reducing sound intensity...
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 01:00 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
um... ok... I was thinking that a true dual system tended to become less efficient as porting & rpm's increased over stock. Would collecting a true dual system at some particular length become more efficient?

Ramses666
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #7  
GORacing's Avatar
Bumble Bee RX-3
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, Florida
Understand there are differences between an true dual, dual and collected exhaust systems... but to answer you new question, yes benifits can be gained by going to a collected system... bottom end torque can be improved by collecting the head pipes relatively close to the engine around were EA suggested, while high RPM engines (typically 8500 +), benifit from the longer collected system...

Now, I can hear the question forming, so... the collected system differes from the X pipe design, as the collected brings both pipes together in to a single pipe with a larger volume, from there the collecter length has to be 'tuned' to an RPM range in the power band of the engine, now to explain futher, as an exhaust pulse exits one head pipe this tuning creates a lower pressure in the opposite head pipe which aids in removing the exhaust from that chamber (process is called exhaust scavanging).
Once tuned then the system can be opened into free air (really loud), one larger pipe or split back into multiple pipes as required to fit under and around the bottom of the car to carry it out past the passenger compartment.
Niether the H or X-pipe is designed to promote the scavenging effect and only serves to split the volume and pressure of the pulses... hope this helps to make more sense...

Last edited by GORacing; Jul 13, 2008 at 02:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
ok... let me get this straight... a long collected and then split exhaust will have better high rpm & larger port performance vs. a true dual setup? How long should the dual primaries be & how long should the collector be? Am I making any sense?

Ramses666
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #9  
GORacing's Avatar
Bumble Bee RX-3
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, Florida
Originally Posted by ramses666
ok... let me get this straight... a long collected and then split exhaust will have better high rpm & larger port performance vs. a true dual setup?
True, however you will most likely not have any room for a split exhaust after the collector, you will be lucky to have room for a muffler and a turn down...

Originally Posted by ramses666
How long should the dual primaries be & how long should the collector be? Am I making any sense?
See EA's post #2, these are general starting ranges, now keep in mind that what you are doing with the car will determine which way to go, exhaust tuning is as critical to performance as the fuel, port and igntion timing, but the nice thing is that street cars tend to be a little more forgiving...
As for the collector size, off the top of my head without looking it up, a general rule of thumb for the diameter of the collector should be calculated out by 1.5 to 1.7 X the total inside area of your head pipes, and starting length should be around 10", the old school tuning trick is to mark a line down the length of the collector with a grease pencil or paint it with regular spray paint, make a hard WOT pass and cut the collector at the point were the paint or grease line is burnt off, then attach your muffler or splitter there...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 02:24 AM
  #10  
certifiednut's Avatar
Mike Honcho
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: des moines iowa
i cant remember the guys name, but someone had a radass system on this forum that collecter about 6 inches before the muffler then used an apexi muffler,, i know he ordered it from a website too. it was awesome. it was in a HUGE exhaust thread from a while back. i'll have to see if i can find it, if i remember right it was around 15 pages long though.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
ok.. I think I've got a handle on the concept, however I don't think I've got 120 inches of exhaust length. I'm looking at putting a collector at 64 inches about 10 inches long and 4 inch diameter then splitting into my two mufflers. Any idea if I would see any gains? A waste of time? Try it & see? Go back to the drawing board? Or should I just keep my true dual setup & forget about it all together?

Ramses666
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Oct 2, 2015 07:56 PM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
rx7inoregon
Old School and Other Rotary
5
Oct 1, 2015 12:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.