2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S4 NA --> S4 TII AFM, voltages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 05:11 AM
  #1  
BlackR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Meesto Spakaro
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Question S4 NA --> S4 TII AFM, voltages

Ok, I got a couple S4 turbo ii AFM's and I'd like to put it in my S4 NA. The flapper is slightly larger and the difference may be negligible....but hey the S4 NA needs all the help it can get.

There is one part on the tii afm that can be drilled which will reveal a voltage adjuster-- what voltage values am I going to need to make this work with the S4 NA?

Sorry if this has been asked before, I but couldn't find any pertinent information as far as voltage correction goes. Thanks in advance!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 01:01 PM
  #2  
BlackR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Meesto Spakaro
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
no one?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 01:04 PM
  #3  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
I always thought N/A and T2 AFMs weren't interchangable??

Oh and have you ever gotten my PMs about the spoiler?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #4  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
There is no advantage to doing this, they both flow the same mount of air. The spring tensions and potentiometer resistances are different, so they shouldn't be swapped.

That adjustment is an air bypass used to calibrate the AFM at the factory.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #5  
Rotorific's Avatar
I dont know a damn thing
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
From: Evans, Ga
uh i thought they flowed diff by about 200 cfm like 400cfm NA and 650cfm TURBO...but that is not pure quoting only what ive read from other various sites.
You can swap them but not for long term use, Kevin landers has done it numberous times to troubleshoot.

http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...n&pagenumber=2 This is my favorite post ive ever read on that site its so rediculous its not even funny but they just so happened to have both the NA and Turbo AFM pages next to each other from the FSM so check it out

Last edited by Rotorific; Jun 27, 2003 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #6  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Rotorific
uh i thought they flowed diff by about 200 cfm like 400cfm NA and 650cfm TURBO...
Wow, those are crazy figures. Both have the same sized inlet and outlet, so the only difference is going to be caused by turbo's stiffer spring, which might make it very slightly more restictive. Are you sure those figures weren't for the entire engine?

It is just me or is TeamFC3S now the slowest website on the planet...
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 01:01 AM
  #7  
MaTT_FoULk's Avatar
earning these was better
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Richardson TX
Originally posted by NZConvertible
It is just me or is TeamFC3S now the slowest website on the planet...
You are on the other side of the world.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
It used to be fine, faster than here in fact.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 08:55 PM
  #9  
BlackR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Meesto Spakaro
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
thanks for the links and the info guys!

screw AFMs! I need a haltech so i can get rid of that crap :p
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 07:16 AM
  #10  
drago86's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
I heard the 400, 650 cfm were max what the afm's could read, not how much they could flow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sethix
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Nov 3, 2017 11:48 PM
WANKfactor
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
Sep 29, 2015 01:14 PM
rattlehead
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 25, 2015 10:55 PM
MidnightOwl
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Sep 25, 2015 10:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.