2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RX8 e-shaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #1  
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Comstock Park, MI 49321
RX8 e-shaft

I have read of people using RX8 e-shafts and I am just curious to why?

Do people normally replace there N/A e-shaft for a RX8 shaft or would it be bennificial to replace my perfectly good S5 T2 e-shaft for an RX8 shaft?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
sm0keyii's Avatar
Everyone loves oppai =)
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
All I know is that it is a half pound lighter. I'd say just wait til your old e-shaft needs replacement.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #3  
TitosToy's Avatar
very sleepy!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
only thing beneficial thats been mentioned is the weight you'll be saving without having to balance the rotating assembly.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #4  
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Comstock Park, MI 49321
if that is the case then I have no need to replace my eshaft.. and I will just use it.. I am gonna use a lightweight flywheel ayways.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #5  
turbo10th's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 2
From: Annapolis,MD
I am going to be building a turbo engine for my 10th ae and was thinking about using one. Do you have to do any mods to it for it to work with the 13bt i wasn't sure if there was any other difference besides the weight?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
Manual Rack
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 1
From: Wanaque NJ
Titos, i though you had to balance everything if something is replaced that isnt the same on the rotating assembly? Because i wanted to get the rx-8 e shaft and a light weight flywheel for my T2 build but though it would need to be rebalanced. If someone could put in there input on this that would be great.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #7  
gross polluter's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
Originally Posted by SpooledupRacing
if that is the case then I have no need to replace my eshaft.. and I will just use it.. I am gonna use a lightweight flywheel ayways.
Pretty much. Besides weight, they're cheaper brand new than a TII eshaft.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
TehMonkay's Avatar
Back in the game
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: Louisville KY
You have to use the RX-8 stationary gears as well.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by TehMonkay
You have to use the RX-8 stationary gears as well.
I don't think you do.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #10  
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
Manual Rack
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 1
From: Wanaque NJ
Why is it everytime i ask a question in a thread everyone ignores me....
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
hatemy7's Avatar
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
im not ignoring you!! i actully have a questions about it also!!, they really didnt answer the questions here so thats why i opened my thread...but all i want to know is what does it do ? faster? more tourque? and do i need to use the stationary gears from an rx8
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #12  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
The stationary gears are only an issue with the rotors.
The RX-8 rotor & stationary gear set has a different tooth profile.

The e-shaft is balanced seperately.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
hatemy7's Avatar
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by SureShot
The stationary gears are only an issue with the rotors.
The RX-8 rotor & stationary gear set has a different tooth profile.

The e-shaft is balanced seperately.
oh ok thaks sureshot...so i wont need em, that will save 250.00...lol..
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #14  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by FelixIsGod29X
Titos, i though you had to balance everything if something is replaced that isnt the same on the rotating assembly? Because i wanted to get the rx-8 e shaft and a light weight flywheel for my T2 build but though it would need to be rebalanced. If someone could put in there input on this that would be great.
This is what I was planning on doing.

You do not need to have the motor rebalanced when using a new RX-8 E-shaft.

Or I should say, you do not NEED to have the motor rebalanced. From what I gather its a 'to build it right, rebalance it, but you can get away not rebalancing'

I probably will get a balance because I am going to use S5 rotors I got from someone else, plus a new Fidanza flywheel, and a new RX-8 E-shaft. The way I see it, I am not replacing one part, so I might as well do it. But I still think you can get away without balancing.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
Oops - DP
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #16  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I heard it had less flex, enabling higher RPMs.

This may be wrong though.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #17  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by F.C.3S
I heard it had less flex, enabling higher RPMs.

This may be wrong though.
I have heard this too, but the more I think about it the more I think it has to do with the weight that enables higher RPM.

I mean, the difference between S4 and S5 is 1000rpm, and the only difference is the weight of the rotors.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #18  
hatemy7's Avatar
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
well im going to use the rx8 eshaft....they way i see it now " lighter rotors , lighter Eshaft, lighter flywheel, who want sum?" lol....
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #19  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Exactly. Less weight on the rotors enables higher rpms since the e-shaft will flex less because of inertia.

And if the e-shaft is stronger, than it can witstand more inertia to weight ratios.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #20  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by F.C.3S
Exactly. Less weight on the rotors enables higher rpms since the e-shaft will flex less because of inertia.

And if the e-shaft is stronger, than it can witstand more inertia to weight ratios.

So if I could find a E-shaft out of admantium, and find rotors made of ultra high temp withstanding plastic....
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #21  
hatemy7's Avatar
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
lol calm down wolverine...lol
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #22  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
I'll sell you my spare adamantium e-shaft for $400. Good for "OMFG THIS ROXORZZ!!!1!" rpm. PM me.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #23  
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Comstock Park, MI 49321
IMO not worth the 180.00 when I have a perfectly almost new T2 shaft..
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #24  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by SpooledupRacing
IMO not worth the 180.00 when I have a perfectly almost new T2 shaft..
Not unless you can sell your almost new T2 shaft for $180.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #25  
chatchie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: mass
Originally Posted by hatemy7
lol calm down wolverine...lol
Ha...he said wolverine
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gfd263
Megasquirt Forum
1
Aug 28, 2016 08:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.